[ Der Inhalt dieser Seite ist beschränkt. ]

...610. (27) 13 Wall. 335. and brought suit, but the court said: "Judges of courts of superior or general jurisdiction are not liable to civil actions for their...alleged to have been done maliciously or corruptly. A distinction must be here observed between excess of jurisdiction and the clear absence of all jurisdiction...

...28. (26) 65 Ala. 610. and brought suit, but the court said: "Judges of courts of superior or general jurisdiction are not liable to civil actions for their...alleged to have been done maliciously or corruptly. A distinction must be here observed between excess of jurisdiction and the clear absence of all jurisdiction...

...modern days carried somewhat further, in the terms of the statement: Judges of superior or general jurisdiction are not liable to civil actions for their...jurisdiction, and are alleged to have been done maliciously and corruptly. Bradley v. Fisher, 13 Wall. 351, 20 L. Ed. 646. It is to be seen that in these different...

...modern days carried somewhat further, in the terms of the statement : Judges of superior or general jurisdiction are not liable to civil actions for their...their jurisdiction, and .are alleged to have been done maliciously_and corruptly. Bradjeyjv'. Fisher. 13 Wall^ 35L.20 L. Ed. 645. It is to be seen that in...

...civil action for any judicial act within their jurisdiction. Judges of superior or general authority, are not liable to civil actions for their judicial...when such acts are In excess of their jurisdiction, unless, perhaps, wheii done maliciously or corruptly. An action cannot be maintained by an attorney...

...jurisdiction where the judge acts maliciously or corruptly. To quote the exact language of the court: "They are not liable to civil actions for their judicial...when such acts are in excess of their jurisdiction, unless perhaps where -the acts, in excess of jurisdiction, are done maliciously or corruptly." There...

...Court of the United States, which court held that judges of courts of record of superior or general jurisdiction are not liable to civil actions for their...alleged to have been done maliciously or corruptly. F1ELD, J. : The plea, as will be seen from our statement of it, not only sets up that the order of...

...Randall v. Brigham, 7 Wall. 523.)" In the case last cited it is said of judges of superior courts: They are not liable to civil actions for their judicial...when such acts are in excess of their jurisdiction, unless perhaps they are done maliciously or corruptly. (Pp. 536, 537.) And in the other cases a distinction...

...jurisdiction are collected lu Randall v. Brigbam, 7 Wall. 531, note L of inferior courts. The former are not liable to civil actions for their judicial...jurisdiction and are alleged to have been done maliciously and corruptly. But the weight of authority appears to be in favor of the doctrine that the latter will...