 ... judges of courts of superior or general jurisdiction are not liable to civil actions for their judicial acts, even when such acts are in excess of their jurisdiction, and are alleged to have been done maliciously or corruptly.  Albany Law Journal - Seite 401875Vollansicht - Über dieses Buch
 | Isaac Grant Thompson - 1882 - 962 Seiten
...cases, as in Bradley v. fisher, 13 Wall. 335, it is held that judges of courts of superior or general jurisdiction are not liable to civil actions for their...alleged to have been done maliciously or corruptly ; and a distinction is made between excess of jurisdiction and the clear absence of all jurisdiction... | |
 | 1884 - 762 Seiten
...were not necessary to a correct statement of the law, and that judges of courts of superior or general jurisdiction are not liable to civil actions for their...judicial acts, even when such acts are in excess of thsir jurisdiction and are alleged to have beea done maliciously or corruptly. A distinction must be... | |
 | 1908 - 1164 Seiten
...Wall. 335, 20 L. Ed. G4C. where It was held that Judges of courts of record of superior or general Jurisdiction are not liable to civil actions for their judicial acts, even when the acts are in excess of their jurisdiction, and are alleged to have been done corruptly and maliciously."... | |
 | Virginia. Supreme Court of Appeals - 1886 - 986 Seiten
...respect to them, no such limitation exists with respect to judges of superior or general authority. They are not liable to civil actions for their judicial acts, even when such a<-ts are in excess of their jurisdiction, ni<hxf<, perhaps, when the aets, iii escess of jurisdiction,... | |
 | 1903 - 1254 Seiten
...page 728, It Is said, viz.: "The rule Is well established that judges of courts of superior or general jurisdiction are not liable to civil actions for their judicial acts, even where such acts are in excess of their jurisdiction, and are alleged to have been done maliciously... | |
 | John William Smith - 1888 - 846 Seiten
...by the Supreme Court of the United States in these terms: "Judges of courts of superior or general jurisdiction are not liable to civil actions for their...alleged to have been done maliciously or corruptly. A distinction must be here observed between excess of jurisdiction and the clear absence of all jurisdiction... | |
 | Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, Michael Crawford Kerr, James Buckley Black, Augustus Newton Martin, Francis Marion Dice, John Worth Kern, John Lewis Griffiths, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy - 1891 - 694 Seiten
...jurisdiction are not liable to civil actions State, ex rel. Egan, v. Wolever et al. for their jndicial acts, even when such acts are in excess of their jurisdiction, and are alleged to have been done maliciously and corruptly. Bradley v. Fisher, 13 Wall. 351." The case of Yates v. Lansing, 5 Johns. 282, is to... | |
 | 1905 - 856 Seiten
...in Fray v. Blackburn, supra, and further declared — "That judges of courts of superior or general jurisdiction are not liable to civil actions for their...alleged to have been done maliciously or corruptly." In the light of these authorities, it plainly appears on the face of his statement of claim that the... | |
 | 1892 - 936 Seiten
...v. Brigham, 74 US 7 Wall. 523. 19 L. ed. 285, and states: "Judges of courts of superior and general jurisdiction are not liable to civil actions for their judicial acts, even when such acts arc in excess of their jurisdiction and are alleged to have been done maliciously or corruptly." See... | |
| |
