 | Lainie Friedman Ross - 1998 - 228 Seiten
...'hard-core pornography', Justice Potter Stewart wrote: 'I shall not today attempt to define [that category] and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it.' Jacobellis v. Ohio 378 US 184 (1964), cited in }. Feinberg, The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law, ii:... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary - 1998 - 420 Seiten
...quote: ". . . the court . . . was faced with the task of trying to define what may be indefinable ... I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced . . . and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. . . But I know it when I see it."... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary - 1998 - 452 Seiten
...quote: ". . . the court . . . was faced with the task of trying to define what may be indefinable ... I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I un(281) 52-880 98-10 derstand to be embraced . . . and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly... | |
 | Christopher A. Anzalone - 2000 - 422 Seiten
...Separation of powers Justice Potter Stewart, concurring Jacobellis v. Ohio, 378 US 184, 197 (1964) I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds...motion picture involved in this case is not that. Keywords: Legal guidelines. Motion pictures, Pornography Justice William Douglas, concurring Memoirs... | |
 | Keith Busby, Catherine M. Jones - 2000 - 602 Seiten
...personali e, come ben sappiamo, Degustibus non disputandum. 1 Le parole dello Stewart sono le seguenti: "I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds...intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it...." (Jacobellis v. Ohio; Supreme Court of the United States; 378 US 184; March 26, 1963). Come si dovrebbe... | |
 | Academie De Droit International De La Haye - 2000 - 472 Seiten
...entitled to First Amendment protection). 375. As US Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart once remarked, "I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds...understand to be embraced within that shorthand description ['obscene']; and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it,... | |
 | Jean Lipman-Blumen - 2000 - 436 Seiten
...oft-quoted remark, Justice Potter Stewart said, "I shall not today attempt further to define [obscenity]; and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it." Jacobettis v. Ohio, 378 US, 184, p. 198, 1964 decision. 33. Badaracco and Ellsworth (1989). 34. For... | |
 | Janice Moore - 2002 - 329 Seiten
...Fourteenth Amendments criminal laws in this area are constitutionally limited to hard-core pornography. I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds...motion picture involved in this case is not that." Jacobellis v Ohio, 378 US 184, 197; 84 S. Ct. 1676, 1683 (1964) (Stewart, I, concurring). Behavioral... | |
 | Edward Cohen - 2000 - 274 Seiten
...the US Constitution] criminal laws are constitutionally limited to hard-core pornography. I shall not attempt further to define the kinds of material I...intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it." Concurring Opinion (p. 6) in Jacobellis v. Ohio, 378 US l84, 84 S. Ct. l676 (l964). Aristotle similarly... | |
 | Mathew D. Clark - 2002 - 92 Seiten
...limited to hard-core pornography, which he would not attempt to define. Then followed his famous remark: "But I know it when I see it, and the motion picture involved in this case is not that." The motion picture was a French film called "Les Amants" ("The Lovers"). ' 481 US 497, 500 (1987).... | |
| |
I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description; and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it, and the motion picture involved in... 
