He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that. His reasons may be good, and no one may have been able to refute them. But if he is equally unable to refute the reasons on the opposite side ; if he does not so much as know what they are,... A Book of Golden Thoughts - Página 91de Henry Attwell - 1870 - 288 páginasVisualização completa - Sobre este livro
| Kenneth Ashworth - 2001 - 224 páginas
...arguments against our position would be. Our staff practice was to abide by John Stuart Mill's admonition: "He who knows only his own side of the case knows little ofthat." Unfortunately our new division director never recovered fully from his "whiplash" injuries.... | |
| Kris Cole - 2001 - 376 páginas
...person's point of view. John Stuart Mill, the nineteenth-century English philosopher and economist, said, "He who knows only his own side of the case, knows little of that." Understanding only our own point of view would not only make us very poor communicators but we wouldn't... | |
| Richard A. Posner - 2009 - 428 páginas
...related point that without confronting objections to an idea its holder cannot understand and defend it. "He who knows only his own side of the case, knows little of that." Id. at 36. trigger. Decisions invalidating regulation have the consequence very disturbing to a pragmatist... | |
| Andrew Bailey - 2004 - 362 páginas
...forensic56 success, requires to be imitated by all who study any subject in order to arrive at the truth. He who knows only his own side of the case, knows...position for him would be suspension of judgment, and unless he contents himself with that, he is either led by authority, or adopts, like the generality... | |
| Ellen Contini-Morava, Robert S. Kirsner, Betsy Rodriguez-Bachiller - 2004 - 410 páginas
...Introduction On paradigms, analyses, and dialogue Robert S. Kirsner University of California, Los Angeles He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that. His reasons maybe good, and no one may have been able to refute them. But if he is equally unable to refute the... | |
| 212 páginas
...state of political life. 'That so few now dare to be eccentric, marks the chief danger of the time. He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that. Tlie pupil icho is netvr requm'd to do ufaat he cannoi do, never does u-iiat lie can do. There are... | |
| Merle Spriggs - 2005 - 296 páginas
...his own side of the case, knows little of (truth]. Mis reasons may l>e good and no one may have Ix-en able to refute them. But if he is equally unable to refute the reasons of the opposite side?; if lie does not so much as know what they arc, he lias no ground for preferring... | |
| Peter Levine - 2007 - 318 páginas
...His argument did not support neutrality as much as the value of experiencing passionate commitment: He who knows only his own side of the case, knows...good, and no one may have been able to refute them. . . . Nor is it enough that he should hear the arguments of adversaries from his own teachers, presented... | |
| Tom Gosselin - 2007 - 240 páginas
...reconcile or manage these differences before the negotiation? Notes: CHAPTER 12 Putting It All Together He who knows only his own side of the case, knows little of that. —John Stuart Mill (1806-1873) British philosopher and economist Practical Negotiating: Planning Guide... | |
| Normand Baillargeon - 2011 - 338 páginas
...him water. — It is time to be finished with this social cancer. THE SUPPRESSION OF RELEVANT DATA He who knows only his own side of the case, knows...are, he has no ground for preferring either opinion. —JOHN STUART MILL This fallacy is one of the most difficult to detect, because, by definition, it... | |
| |