...States contrary to law, or whoever conspires to do any of the foregoing acts, shall be imprisoned .... "Whenever on trial for a violation of this subsection,...explains his possession to the satisfaction of the jury." 6 Opinion of the Court. that he had knowingly transported and facilitated the transportation and concealment...

...violation of subdivision (c) the defendant is shown to have or to have had possession of the narcotic drug, such possession shall be deemed sufficient evidence...authorize conviction, unless the defendant explains the possession to the satisfactioii of the jury. cotic drug shall be seized, forfeited, and disposed...

...violation of this section the defendant is shown to have or to have had possession of the narcotic drug, such possession shall be deemed sufficient evidence...authorize conviction unless the defendant explains the possession to the satisfaction of the jury. A. ELEMENTS: (1) Whoever: (a) unlawfully imports or...

...business of a distiller or rectifier was so engaged in or carried on, such presence of the defendant shall be deemed sufficient evidence to authorize conviction, unless the defendant explains such presence to the satisfaction of the jury (or of the court when tried without jury)." (23) AMENDMENTS...

...section 176b, with respect to selling heroin to juveniles.) Section 176a also provides that possession is sufficient evidence to authorize conviction unless...explains his possession to the satisfaction of the jury. This presumption, however, was recently declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court.32 The Court...

...conviction, be fined not to exceed $10,000 or be imprisoned for not more than five years, or both. Whenever on trial for a violation of this subsection the defendant is shown to have or to have had possession of any certificate not duly issued to him, such possession shall be deemed sufficient evidence...

...away. Narducci had the package in his hand "less than half a minute." Since the statute provided that "possession shall be deemed sufficient evidence to...authorize conviction unless the defendant explains such possession to the satisfaction of the jury," the defense argument, inter alia, was that Narducci...

...brought into the United States, and that the defendant knew of the illegal importation or bring in, unless the defendant explains his possession to the satisfaction of the jury. On May 19, 1969. the Supreme Court held in favor of the petitioner (Dr. Leary) on both issues and reversed...

...brought into the United States, and that the defendant knew of the illegal importation or bring in, unless the defendant explains his possession to the satisfaction of the jury. On May 19, 1969. the Supreme Court held in favor of the petitioner (Dr. Leary) on both issues and reversed...

...business of a distiller or rectifier was so engaged in or carried on, such presence of the defendant shall be deemed sufficient evidence to authorize conviction, unless the defendant explains such presence to the satisfaction of the jury (or of the court when tried without jury)." (23) AMENDMENTS...