...Cockburn, CJ, in The Queen v. Hicklin, LR 3 QB at p. 371, where he says: "The test of obscenity, is this, whether the tendency of the matter charged as obscenity...whose hands a publication of this sort may fall." This test was approved and adopted in England in Steele v. Brannan, LR 7 CP 261, and in this Court in Rex...

...classical English case in which the defendant was convicted on a criminal charge, the test of guilt being "whether the tendency of the matter charged as obscenity...into whose hands a publication of this sort may fall" (Regina v. Hicklin, Law Rep. 3 Queens Bench 360). With similar vagueness the United States Supreme...

...classical English case in which the defendant was convicted on a criminal charge, the test of guilt being "whether the tendency of the matter charged as obscenity...into whose hands a publication of this sort may fall" (Regina v. Bicklin, Law Rep. 3 Queens Bench 360). With similar vagueness the United States Supreme...

...be obscene when its tendency is to excite libidinous thoughts and desires or to corrupt and deprave those whose minds are open to such immoral influences and into whose hands it may fall. 1 Persons publishing books necessary for medical instruction may be liable for uttering...

...proper instructions. Lord Cockburn laid down a test in Reg. v. Hicklin, LR, 32 B. 36 in these words: "Whether the tendency of the matter charged as obscenity...whose hands a publication of this sort may fall." That test has been accepted by the lower federal courts until it would be no longer proper for me to...

...and can not be interpreted as license." "The test of obscenity within the meaning of the statute is: Whether the tendency of the matter charged as obscenity is to deprave and corrupt the morals of those whose minds are open to such immoral influences and into whose hands this book...

...classical English case in which the defendant was convicted on a criminal charge, the test of guilt being "whether the tendency of the matter charged as obscenity...into whose hands a publication of this sort may fall" (Regina v. Hicklin, Law Rep. 3 Queens Bench 360). With similar vagueness the United States Supreme...

...examine and question the truth of Christian doctrines, (i) Obscene words are such as are calculated to deprave and corrupt those whose minds are open to such immoral influences, and into whose hands such matter is likely to fall. (M) Seditious words are such as tend to bring into hatred or contempt,...

...examine and question the truth of Christian doctrines, (t) Obscene words are such as are calculated to deprave and corrupt those whose minds are open to such immoral influences, and into whose hands such matter is likely to fall, (u) Seditious words are such as tend to bring into hatred or contempt,...

...the jury in the "Hagar Rcvelly" case: "The test of obscenity within the meaning of the statute is: Whether the tendency of the matter charged as obscenity is to deprave and corrupt the morals of those whose minds are open to such immoral influences and into whose hands this book...