...proviso, that either government might annul and abrogate the convention, at any time after the 20th of October, 1828, on giving due notice of twelve months to . the other contracting party-* During these negotiations, and up to the final arrangement, the British government, through her ministers...

...proviso, that either government might annul and abrogate the convention, at any time after the 20th of October, 1828, on giving due notice of twelve months to the other contracting party-* During these negotiations, and up to the final arrangement, the British government, through her ministers...

...convention of the sixth of August, 1827, that either party might abrogate and annul 'the said convention, on giving due notice of twelve months to the other contracting party. This agreement was entered into because the governments of the two countries were unable to settle...

...convention of the sixth of August, 1827, that either party might abrogate and annul the said convention, on giving due notice of twelve months to the other contracting party. This agreement was entered into because the governments of the two countries were unable to settle...

...be competent for either of the contracting parties, after the 20th of October, 1828, on giving duo notice of twelve months to the other contracting party, to annul and abrogate the agreement of joint occupation. his predecessors, to adjust the question on the parallel of forty-nine...

...indefinite period, and that it should be competent for either of the contracting parties, after the 20lh of October, 1828, on giving due notice of twelve months...the other contracting party, to annul and abrogate the agreement of joint occupation. Thus the Oregon question stood when President Polk came into power....

...should think fit at any time after the 20th of October, 1828, on giving due notice of twelve mouths to the other contracting party, to annul and abrogate...abrogated, after the expiration of the said term of notice. " Art. 3. Nothing contained in this Convention, or in the third article of the convention of...

...to either of the contracting parties, in case either should think fit at any time after the 20th of October, 1828, on giving due notice of twelve months...other contracting party, to annul and abrogate this Con1 Congress Documents, 20th Cong. and 1st Sess. No. 199. Greenhow, Proofs and Illustrations, II....

...be competent for either of the contracting parties, after the 20th of October, 1828, on giving duo notice of twelve months to the other contracting party, to annul and abrogate the agreement of joint occupation. Thus the Oregon question stood when President Polk came into power....

...August, eighteen hundred and twenty-seven, that either party might abrogate and annul said convention on giving due notice of twelve months to the other contracting party. And whereas it has now become desirable that the respective claims of the United States and Great Britain...