...and candidates — Voting. — The principle that the constitutional guarantees of .free speech and free press do not permit a State to forbid or proscribe...producing imminent lawless action and is likely to produce such action, applies to state regulation burdening access to the ballot, rights of association...

...rights to advocate any course of action Including the "use of force or law violation except where snch advocacy Is directed to Inciting or producing Imminent...action and Is likely to Incite or produce such action." I believe a criminal standard should also apply to all forms of possible espionage engaged in by American...

...incitement to action. In that cnse, the Court said : '* * * the constitutional guarantees of free speech and free press do not permit a State to forbid or proscribe...action and is likely to incite or produce such action.' (395 US 444.) This is a 1969 per curiara decision of the Supreme Court and there is no reason to expect...

...invalidating the Ohio Criminal Syndicalism Act: "[TJhe constitutional guarantees of free speech and free press do not permit a State to forbid or proscribe...action and is likely to incite or produce such action " Brandenburg v. Ohio. 395 US 444, 447 (1969) . Since no claim had been made that Coffin's speech would...

...The present rule appears to be that advocacy of the use of force or law violation is punishable only "where such advocacy is directed to inciting or producing...action and is likely to incite or produce such action." Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 US*. 444, 447 (1969). The requirement of "imminent" lawless action limits...

...1827, 1829, 23 L.Ed.2d 430 (1969) (per curiam) (speech advocating violence cannot be prohibited unless "such advocacy is directed to inciting or producing...and is likely to incite or produce such action"). Of course, much of the activity attributed to the JDL was clearly illegal But the Soviet government...

...unpopular or alien. Even advocacy of the use of force or violation of law may be punished only where it is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless...action and is likely to incite or produce such action. Abusive or profane language also is protected unless it is directed to a specific individual and tends...

...proscribe advocacy of the use of force or law violation except where such advocacy is directed toward inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action." In the absence of such clear and present danger, the government cannot act against speech nor, presumably,...

...constitutional problem is not that of entrapment (see United States v. Russell, 411 US 423 (1973)) but whether "such advocacy" is ". . . directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to produce such action", Brandenburg v. Ohio, supra, n. 1 at 447. The American Law Institute notes that...

...on mere advocacy as follows: Under our decisions, "the constitutional guarantees of free speech and free press do not permit a State to forbid or proscribe...action and is likely to incite or produce such action." Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 US 444, 447 (1969) (Emphasis added.) See also Terminiello v. Chicago, 337...