...Montesquien was gnided, it may clearly he inferred that, in saying " There can be no liberty where the legislative and executive powers are united in the same person, or body of magistrates," or, "if the power of judging he not separated from the legislative and executive...

...directly, in compliance with a somewhat popular clamor. Montesquieu says: "There can be no liberty where the legislative and executive powers are united in the same person or body of magistrates." The House of Representatives and the President could easily unite the legislative...

...another;" "When the power of making laws and the power of executing them are united in the same person, or the same body of magistrates, there can be no liberty,...because apprehensions may arise lest the same monarch or magistrates should enact tyrannical laws and execute them in a tyrannical manner;" "The power of judging...

...department. The reasons on which Montesquieu grounds his maxim are a further demonstration of his meaning. " When the legislative and executive powers are united in the same person or body," says he, " there can be no liberty, because apprehensions may arise, lest the taine monarch...

...departments of power should be separate and distinct." "There can be no liberty," said Montesquieu, "where the legislative and executive powers are united in the same person or body of magistrates." 21 remarkable page in the history of civilized mankind. The echoes of the savage...

...another;" "When the power of making laws and the power of 'executing them are united in the same person, or the same body of magistrates, there can be no liberty,...because apprehensions may arise lest the same monarch or magistrates should enact tyrannical laws and execute them in a tyrannical manner;" "The power of judging...

...three sorts of powers: The executive, the legislative, and the judicial. When the legislative and the executive powers are united in the same person, or...same body of magistrates, there can be no liberty. Again, there is no liberty, if the power of judging be not separated from the legislative and executive...

...meaning. "When the legislative and executive powers are united in the same person or body," says he, " there can be no liberty, because apprehensions may arise lest the same monarch ot senate should enact tyrannical laws to execute them in a tyrannical manner. " Again: " Were the...

...liberty, it is requisite the government be so constituted as one man need not be afraid of another. When the legislative and executive powers are united...liberty; because apprehensions may arise, lest the same eThe natural end of a state that has f The greater part of the principles no foreign enemies, or that...

...legislative and executive powers." For the first part of this maxim, the reason, tersely given, is, " becauee of one State to pass through or to reside in any...purposes of trade, agriculture, professional pursuits and for the latter portion of the maxim, " if the power to judge be joined with the power to legislate,...