...are prohibited. Open competition is the rule enjoined by this statute. Monopoly is prohibited. What is implied in a statute is as much a part of it as what is expressed. Is "form" sacred and "substance" to be disregarded by the legislative power at its mere will and pleasure?...

...members of a partnership to limit their liability, under the common law in any other manner, since "that which is implied in a statute is as much a part of it as what is expressed." Sutherland on Statutory Construction, § 334; 25 RCL § 229, pp. 982, 983; 36 Cyc. 1122, 1145. And...

...members of a partnership to limit their liability, under the common law in any other manner, since "that which is implied in a statute is as much a part of it as what is expressed." Sutherland on Statutory Construction, § 334; 25 RCL § 229, pp. 982, 983; 36 Cyc. 1122, 1145. And...

...the necessity of filling the jury with talesmen or issuing a special venire. However, what is plainly implied in a statute is as much a part of it as that which is expressed (Doyle v. Doyle, 50 0. S., 330; Sawyer v. State, 45 0. S.. 343), and it being...

...legislative action unless clearly satisfied of its invalidity. — Baca T. Perez, VIIM87-96; 42 Pac. 162. 24. That which is implied In a statute Is as much a part of It as what is expressed. — Bucher v. Thompson, VII-115-17; 32 Pac. 498. 25. When one jurisdiction adopts without change the...

...the will of the legislature by the logical process of inference. "It is a rule of construction that that which is implied in a statute is as much a part of it as what is expressed." 88 And as a statute must 8i Great Northern Ry. Co. v. United States, 155 Fed. 945, 84 C. CA 93 (affirmed...

...necessary implication from the statutory description of the result to be secured; and what is necessarily implied in a statute is as much a part of it as what is expressed: Chester v. Bank, 9 Pa. Super. Ct. 517; Brewer's License, 12 id. 176, 190; US v. Babbit, 1 Black (US)...

...citizen, p. 209. Cited in Be Central Irr. Dist., 117 Cal. 391, 49 Pac. 357, approvingly. Statutes. — That Which is Implied in a Statute is as much a part of it as that which is expressed, p. 210. Cited in Paulson v. City of Portland, 16 Or. 465, 19 Pac. 459, 1 L....

...once enveloped, and which interprets their implications and defines their incidental consequences. That which is implied in a statute is as much a part of it ' as what is expressed." Sutherland on Statutory Construction, § 334. In accordance with these principles we would assume,...

...meant by such cardinal principles of statutory construction as that whatever is necessarily or plainly implied in a statute is as much a part of it as that which is expressed ; that in accordance with the maxim, noscitur a sociis, the meaning of a word...