Abbildungen der Seite
PDF
EPUB

tor of Glarus 1506. He studied the Greek New Testament very carefully, and copied it with his own hand; preached against the mercenary service of his countrymen; in 1516 accepted a call to St. Mary's at Einsiedeln, and began to attack superstitious practices, but with the consent of his superiors; he even received for a while, as one of the most popular preachers, a pension from the papal nuncio in Switzerland to aid him in his studies and to secure his political influence. In Dec., 1518, he was called to the cathedral at Zurich, where he labored till his death. He preached "Christ from the fountains" and "inserted the pure Christ into the hearts:" broke loose gradually from Romanism; introduced the Reformation in Zurich 1524, after some public disputations with the champions of the old system; led the Reform movement in the other German cantons of Switzerland; attended the conference at Berne 1528, which resulted in the abolition of the mass. He was invited to a personal conference with Luther and Melanchthon at Marburg Sept., 1529, to adjust the only serious doctrinal difference between them on the Eucharistic Presence. He counselled energetic measures for the promotion of the Reform in his native land, but was defeated by the policy of hesitation which prevailed in Berne. He also entered into bold political coinbinations with Philip of Hesse for the triumph of the Protestant cause in Germany, and addressed the emperor of Germany and the king of France with a confession of his faith. But he was cut down in the midst of his career. At the outbreak of the war between the Roman Catholic and Protestant cantons he accompanied the Zurich regiment as chaplain, according to Swiss custom, and was pierced by a lance in the disastrous battle at Cappel, Oct. 11, 1531, while stooping to comfort a dying soldier. His last audible words were, "What of that? They can indeed kill the body, but they cannot kill the soul." His remains were burned, and the ashes scattered to the four winds. A plain monument in granite erected in 1838 marks the spot where he died.

Zwingli was a bold Reformer, an able scholar, an eloquent preacher, a patriotic republican, and far-sighted statesman. He lacked the genius and depth of Luther and Calvin, the learning of Melanchthon and Ecolampadius, but he was their equal in honesty of purpose, integrity of character, heroic courage, and devotion to the cause of Reformation, and surpassed them in liberality. His prominent intellectual trait was clear, strong common sense. He had no organ for the mystic element in religion. He loved music and poetry, but in public worship he favored puritanic simplicity, and removed all pictures from the churches to prevent the temptation to idolatry. In his theological views he was more radical than Luther, and departed farther from the medieval traditions. He differed chiefly from his view of the real presence of Christ's body and blood in the sacrament, and held this ordinance to be merely a commemoration of the atoning death of Christ: but notwithstanding this difference he offered him with tears the hand of brotherhood, which Luther refused. In some articles he was ahead of his age, and held opinions which were then deemed dangerous and heretical. He had a milder view on original sin and guilt than the other Reformers, and believed that all infants dying before the age of responsibility, whether baptized or not, and all the nobler heathen who lived up to their standard of virtue and longed after the true religion, are saved by the grace of Christ, which may operate upon the heart without the ordinary means and visible signs. His principal works are a Commentary on the True and False Religion (1525), a sermon On Providence (preached at Marburg, 1529), his Confession of Faith, addressed to Charles V. at the Diet of Augsburg (1530), a similar Exposition of Faith, addressed to Francis I. of France (July, 1531, three months before his death). This last document is clear, bold, spirited, and full of hope for the triumph of the truth, warns the king against the slanderous misrepresentations of Protestant doctrines, and entreats him to give free course to the gospel, and to forgive the boldness with which he dared to approach His Majesty. A few years afterward (1536) Calvin dedicated in a most eloquent preface his famous Christian Institutes to the same monarch, but with equal want of direct sucIt is questionable whether he ever read either document. Zwingli represents only the first stage in the history of the Reformed Church. His work was completed after his death by his successor, Bullinger, at Zurich, and still more by Calvin at Geneva. The fourth centennial of his birth was extensively celebrated Jan. 1, 1884, in Reformed churches in Switzerland, Holland, and the U. S.

cess.

Literature.-H. Zwinglii Opera, ed. Schuler and Schulthess (Zurich, 1828-42, 8 vols.); a popular edition of his works by Christoffel (Zurich, 1843 seq., 15 vols.); Bingraphies of Zwingli by Myconius (1536), Nüscheler (1776),

Hess (1811; trans. by Aiken, London, 1812), Schuler (1819), Hottinger (1843; trans. by Th. C. Porter, Harrisburg, 1856), Robins (in Bibliotheca Sacra for 1851), Röder (1855), Christoffel (1857: trans. by John Cochran, Edinburg, 1858), Güder (in Herzog's Encykl., 1864), and especially Mörikofer (Ulrich Zwingli nach den Quellen, Leipsic, 1867-69, 2 vols.). On the theological system of Zwingli see Zeller, Das theolog. System Zwingli's (1855); Siegwart, Ulrich Zwingli der Charakter seiner Theologie (1855); Spörri, Zwingli-Studien (1866). Compare also Merle d'Aubigné's History of the Reformation, 4th vol.; and Fisher, The Reformation (1873, pp. 137 seq.). A large number of pamphlets and articles were called forth by the fourth centennial celebration, in 1884. PHILIP SCHAFF.

Zwir'ner (ERNST FRIEDRICH), b. at Jakobswald, Silesia, Feb. 28, 1802; studied at the building-school of Breslau, afterward at the architectural academy of Berlin; worked several years under Schinkel, and was appointed in 1833 architect to the cathedral of Cologne. He finished the restoration of the old building and erected the transept and the northern and southern portals. He also built a number of villas, palaces, and churches in the regions along the Rhine. D. at Cologne Sept. 22, 1861.

Zwolle, town of the Netherlands, capital of the prorince of Overyssel, on the Zwarte-Water, is one of the finest and handsomest cities of the country, with broad and straight streets and many public squares. It is the seat of many educational and benevolent institutions, and has extensive manufactures of oil, beer, spirits. linens, and iron Vechte, and has a trade in corn, butter, cheese, cattle, fish, goods. By canals it communicates with the Yssel and and oysters. P. 22,759.

Zygade'nus, or, less correctly, Zygabenus (EUTHYMIUS), a Byzantine theologian of the twelfth century, and "the last of the Greek commentators." He was monk of a convent dedicated to the Virgin Mary near Constantinople, and flourished under Alexius Comnenus (1081-1118 a. D.), at whose request he wrote his Panoply against all Heresies. His commentaries on the Psalms and Gospels are still referred to by scholars. Other commentaries (on the Pauline and Catholic Epistles), and other works (including letters), are in manuscript in the Vatican. R. D. HITCHCOCK.

the ancient name-a name of the typical genus], a family Zygæn'idæ [Lat. Zygæna-Zúyaiva, from ¿vyór, “ yoke,” of selachians of the order Squali, and containing the hamand like that of the typical sharks; the scales are rhom mer-headed sharks. The body is moderately elongated, boid or leaf-like: the head is depressed, transverse, and extended outward or sidewise to a greater or less extent: the eyes are lateral and near the angles of the lateral extension of the head, and provided each with a nictitating membrane; the nostrils are developed in the front of the head; the mouth is inferior and convex forward; the teeth are moderate and in several rows (in all the known species nearly alike in both jaws, oblique and with a notch); the branchial apertures are five, of moderate size, and the last are above the pectoral fins; the spiracles are nullified in the adult; the dorsal fins are two, the first between the pectorals and ventrals, the second above the anal; the anal is normally developed; the caudal elongated, and with a well-developed liver-lobe: the pectoral fins are moderate; the ventrals small. The family is anomalous by reason of the peculiar extension of the sides of the head; this extension is carried to its maximum in the Eusphyra Blockii (Zygana laticeps of some authors), and is least developed in the Reniceps tiburo; in the former it is T-shaped, and in the latter kidney-shaped. The common hammer-headed shark (Sphyrna zygæna = Zygæna malleus) exhibits an intermediate condition. Five species are known, which by are differentiated into three genera-Eusphyra, Sphyrna, and Reniceps. The Sphyrna zygana is not uncommon on the U. S. coasts, and the Reniceps tiburo is an occasional visitor. (See, also, HAMMER-HEAD.) THEO. GILL. Zylonite. See APPENDIX.

some

Zymot'ic Diseases. (See definition and list of, in article on NosOLOGY; see also GERM THEORY OF DISEASE.) The so-called zymotic diseases are characterized by their division into successive periods and more or less regular sequence of symptoms and uniform duration. The period between exposure to the source of disease and its final development is termed the stage of "incubation" or "formative stage," and it is especially during this period that the morbific matter has multiplied by zymosis or ferment. The "germ theory," which has many supporters, assumes that each zymotic disease has peculiar cellular or organized vi talized elements, and that each, by its individual peculiarities of development, determines the stages and symptoms of the sickness which its access to the blood has created. E. DARWIN HUDSON, JR. REVISED BY WILLARD PARKER. Zytomierz', a town of Russia. See JITOMIR.

APPENDIX.

[EMBRACING SUPPLEMENTARY ARTICLES AND ARTICLES RECEIVED TOO LATE FOR INSERTION IN THEIR ORDER.]

M
M
- 2 r cos and r sin p
D3
D3

(a)

Thor'old (Right Rev. ANTHONY WILSON), D. D., b. at a radius directed to the moon, we find it subject to both Hougham, England, June 13, 1825; educated at Queen's these actions, as expressed by components: College, Oxford; was rector of St. Giles-in-the-Fields, London, 1857-68; minister of Curzon chapel 1868; became vicar of St. Pancras, Middlesex, and rural dean 1869; canon residentiary of York 1874; consecrated bishop of Rochester July 25, 1877; author of The Presence of Christ.

Thorpe (THOMAS EDWARD), F. R. S., b. at Harpurhey, near Manchester, England, Dec. 8, 1845; educated at Owens College, Manchester, and at the Universities of Heidelberg and Bonn: became demonstrator of chemistry at Owens College 1869; professor of chemistry in Anderson's College, Glasgow, 1870, and in Yorkshire College, Leeds, 1874: member of various scientific societies, and became examiner in chemistry to the University of London in 1882. Author of numerous works, among which are Inorganic Chemistry, Qualitative Analysis, Quantitative Analysis, and Chemical Problems; he has also contributed various articles to Watts's Dictionary of Chemistry and to scientific periodicals.

Tideman (ADOLPH), b. at Mandal, Norway, Aug. 14, 1816, studied painting at Copenhagen and Dusseldorf, and achieved a great reputation as a painter of landscapes and the so-called "historical genre." He decorated Oscarshall, a royal villa situated close by Christiania, and several of his pictures of rural life in Norway became widely known through engravings. D. in Christiania Aug. 24, 1876.

Tides, Theories of. In the article TIDES, OCEANIC WAVES, AND CURRENTS, a popular explanation is given of the cause of the tides. In Fig. 1 of that article is shown how the moon causes "high water," not only immediately under itself, but at the point diametrically opposed, while "low water" occurs on a great circle along which the moon is in the horizon. Were the earth a solid spheroidal body held fixed in space and covered by an ocean, a foreign attraction (e.g. that of the moon) would move all the waters, both those directly under and those opposite, toward the attracting body; those under it would be elevated, those opposite depressed. But the earth is not thus held fixed in space; its solid nucleus and its enveloping waters are alike affected by the foreign attraction, the convergence of lines of direction of which toward its source, and the law of distance, generating differential action on the fluid particles and the rigid nucleus. The latter obeys the attraction as if exerted upon its centre, the actual motion the earth thus receives being a recognized element in our astronomical tables. The waters nearer the moon than that centre are more powerfully attracted-those more remote less sothan the solid nucleus. Let D be the distance from the moon to centre of the earth, r the radius of the earth, and M* the moon's mass. Then the attraction upon the earth's centre will be Dz; upon a particle of water immediately

M

M M under the moon ; upon a particle opposite (D-r)2 (D+r)2 The first of these attractions is less than the second and greater than the third; hence the difference between the first expression and the two latter, (very nearly), will

2 Mr
D3

lar circle to which the moon is in the horizon. The disturb

(in which is counted from 0 to # only).
By the superadded foreign components of force (a) the
spherical form of fluid surface will evidently be elongated,
the water will be raised at the point under the moon and
its antipodes, and it will be depressed along the perpendicu-
ing forces, very minute compared to forces (b), being equal
all around the axis of elongation, the induced figure will
be one of revolution, which we may assume to be an ellip-
soid, prolate and of slight eccentricity. That it should be
a surface of equilibrium, its normal at any point must coin-
cide in direction with the resultant of the forces. But when
we come to consider gravitation as proceeding from an
ellipsoid, and not a sphere, its components are themselves
modified by the induced change of form; "that is, one of
the elements necessary to the determination of the form
depends itself on the form" (Airy).

Fortunately, the attraction of homogeneous ellipsoids has been determined, and if we develop, with neglect of powers of the eccentricity above the square, and apply the known expressions (Méc. Cél., Bowditch, vol. ii. p. 54; Airy, Figure of the Earth, 23; or Thomson and Tait, & 771) to the earth considered as a homogeneous, slightly-prolate ellipsoid of revolution, we shall find the expressions (E representing the mass of the earth)

E

[ocr errors]

E 1-2

(1-e) r cos, (1 + fe2) r sin o. (b)

The small increments of these components of gravitation (terms in e2) are due only to the change of form-i. e. to the raised or depressed superficial matter; and if the nucleus) this is water, its relative density, 8, must be introearth is not homogeneous, if (covering a solid and denser duced as a factor. Combining these forces thus modified with the foreign attractions (a), the total forces, normal and parallel to the axis of figure, become (since gravity)

[blocks in formation]

Mr

sin o,

D3

Mr.

[blocks in formation]

7 (1 — fe28) — 21

E

r2 = 9, or

[blocks in formation]

We find, therefore, that a prolate ellipsoid of revolution of the slight eccentricity thus determined satisfies with sufficient exactness the conditions of equilibrium. The polar equation of the generating ellipse, referred to 12 , in which b is the express, in either case, a force drawing the particles (re-its centre, may be written r2 = 1- e2cos20' spectively) away from the earth's nucleus. With respect lesser axis. If we take a for the mean radius of the gento particles along the great circle to which the moon is on erated ellipsoid-i. e. the radius of sphere of same volume the horizon, there is a compressing component (i. e. toward = b(1+ je2), and put ra(1+ y), and substitute in above the diameter directed to the moon), expressed by the total and omit higher powers of eccentricity, we get (taking, M attraction, into D2' This component is due to finally, a for unity) D3 the convergence of lines of attraction upon centre and upon external point, and is equal to into sine, the minute angle. If we consider an intermediate superficial particle, in any plane, at an angular distance & from

[blocks in formation]
[merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small]

The moon, as the most influential agent of the tides, is mentioned, but what is said applies equally to the sun.

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small]
[blocks in formation]

M

1

1

[ocr errors]

D3g 1-38

If & be 90°, y The maximum elevation of the water is therefore double its maximum depression. In case of the earth, & is about , and the factor in which it enters amounts to but 13. But were the earth a homogeneous fluid throughout, this coefficient would become; and we find in that case the direct effect due to the foreign attraction exaggerated in that ratio by the mutual attractions (or want of them) in raised and depressed portions. The factor in question will be omitted hereafter, its effect being understood.

We have now to refer the tidal configuration we have

[blocks in formation]

found to the co-ordinates by which we usually express position on the surface of the earth. Since it revolves daily about its axis P P', while the configuration remains fixed in relation to the moon, any point of the nucleus, as h, will be borne along a parallel of latitude, and will at h1 have, above it, high water-at h2 (when the great circle g g is intersected), its lowest water-at 3, high water again, but yet of inferior height to that belonging to position h1; unless, indeed, the moon be on the equator, when the two opposite high waters will be equal. In the difference between the high tides h1 and h3 we have what is called the diurnal inequality; and the phenomena just delineated indicate the analysis into diurnal and semi-diurnal tide.

Lete represent the polar distance (complement of the latitude) of a fluid particle; &, its longitude measured from a meridian fixed on the earth's surface; nt, the angle that this diurnally-rotating meridian makes at any moment with a fixed celestial meridian (in which t represents the time and n the angular velocity of the earth's rotation on its axis);, the moon's right ascension (measured from the same celestial meridian), and v its declination N. or S. as may be.

The cos of the foregoing equation (a) becomes transformed, so that the equation reads thus:

[merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

The value of y is thus made up of three terms of marked characteristics, indicated by the diagrams I., II., III. of Fig. 2, on which protuberant portions are shaded. (I.) is independent of the earth's diurnal rotation nt, and also of the longitude, w, of the locality. It is the same, therefore, at all hours, and the same throughout each parallel of latitude. It is zero for latitude which makes 1+ 3 cos 200, or for lat. 35° 16' (N. or S.); it is negative (a depression) for higher latitudes; it is positive (a protuberance) for the equatorial belt between these parallels. It is least when the moon has its greatest declination, but is the same whether that be positive or negative (N. or S.). It is a secular disturbance, depending on the moon's variable angular distance from the equator, and is what would be produced were an imaginary moon and anti-moon each of half the mass of the actual moon distributed in two parallel circles of radius equal to the moon's distance from the earth's axis. "As these circles of matter gradually move each fortnight from the equator to maximum declination and back, the tide produced will be exactly the 'fortnightly tide.'" (Thomson and Tait, Nat. Philos.) A "half-yearly" one will also be due to the sun.

FIG. 2.

The term II. (Fig. 2) goes through all its phases as the

[blocks in formation]

are nt +

[blocks in formation]

increases from zero to 360°, whether (for the same place) it depends on the time-term, nt, which thus increases in 24 hours, or (for the same instant) the longitude, . It gives high tide in the northern hemisphere (vice versâ for the southern) when, the moon's declination being northern, the meridian of the locality is under the moon, low tide when opposed to it. Its highest or lowest water occurs for the parallel of latitude for which the product sine cose is maximum (i. e. when = 45°). Its neutral lines are the equator and the meridian PeP' at right angles to that passing through the moon. As depending on the declination, it is maximum when that has its highest attainable value, and vanishes when that is zero.

The oblateness of the earth, as having no sensible influence on the amount and distribution of tidal elevation, has not been hitherto referred to. But, as pertinent to this diurnal tide, I remark that if we attribute to Diagram II. the small ellipticity e of the earth, the distortion expressed is a slight turning of the figure about an equatorial axis perpendicular to the plane of the diagram through the M angle

sin v cos v; but if the spheroid were wholly D3ge fluid, the distortion would be magnified two and a half times (by coefficient of formula (c)), and if it have a rotation, n, about PP', then gen2, and the above angle beM comes 3 sin v cos v. If the planes of diurnal rotaD3,12

P' Semi-diurnal.

tion (or parallels of latitude) be tilted through the small fraction of this angle denoted by 2e (through about% second of arc)-that is, if they all be that much deviated from true perpendicularity to the axis of rotation-the distortion of Fig. II. will result; hence, this is the internal motion by which this tidal development would be accomplished in a homogeneous fluid ellipsoid of revolution; a fact important in its relations to the phenomenon of the precession of the equinoxes.

The term III. (Fig. 2) goes through all its phases twice while nt +- increases from zero to 2, whether by increments of time for the same place, or without change of time, by following a parallel of latitude. It is a semidiurnal tide. As effected by latitude, it is proportional to the sin of the polar distance of the locality. If we reckon longitude from the meridian under the moon, the neutral (or zero-elevation) lines will be the two meridians PeP'; the line of low water will be the meridian at right angles to that which passes through the attracting body.

Thus, we find the total distortion represented by our Fig. 1 to be susceptible of analysis into the three distinct distortions represented by Diagrams (Fig. 2) I., II., IIL (spherical harmonics), which, superimposed one upon the other, would reproduce it.

In what precedes, the earth has been treated as if it were a truly spherical solid enveloped by water. No account has been taken of the diurnal rotation (except as it

TIDES, THEORIES OF.

relates to the manifestation), none of the motion required in the waters themselves to assume the attributed forms.

3M

693

already mentioned, sin v cos v (scarcely more than D3,2 When we consider diurnal rotation, and the centrifugal three seconds of are for moon), will give values to p, as force developed by it, the primitive form on which the tides resulting from expressions (A), exactly neutralizing the are generated must be taken as that of an ellipsoid of revoaction of the attracting bedy to produce the tidal elevations, lution equatorially oblate. But this oblateness being really, of II. If, while uniform along para!:els of latitude, there very slight, the tidal developments upon it are essentially be an increment (or decrement) of depths along meridians the same as upon the perfect sphere. Disregarding the proportionate to cose, such a shifting of axis through a motion of the water required to produce them (and depths somewhat different angle will not only neutralize the atnot very many times greater than found in existing seas tractive force, but sustain the abnormal elevations due to are sufficient to allow the motions to be disregarded), the forms I., II., III. would be the actual tidal forms developed in an ocean covering the whole earth.

the displacement of the quasi-solid shell. A slight separation of the axes would (geometrically) require the resulting

In the foregoing we have what is known as the "equilib-displacements, u and r, of the fluid particles in lat. and lon. to be expressed by (C being a small arbitrary constant)

rium theory" of the tides, first indicated by Newton, and developed into its ultimate form by Daniel Bernouilli in his work Du Flux et Reflux de la Mer.

u = C cos (nt +ŵ − ↓); v = C sin (ut+);

cos O sin @

[blocks in formation]

cos V, we shall have from the expressions (A)— 3M sin v cos v sine cos e cos (nt + ŵ − ¥), D3g

p ༡

If the motion of the water necessary to the development and if the depth be uniform, and C made equal to of tides and the resistances thereto (for any assumed ocean depths and configurations) could be subjected to calculation, we should have not only a "dynamic" but a true tidal theory. The so-called "dynamic theory" of Laplace takes account of "motion," but neglects the inseparable "resistances." If a particle of fluid be running southward with angular velocity (in which is the displacement in latitude of a dt particle of which the normal latitude is 0), with an acceled'u

[ocr errors]

ration represented by there must to produce this acdt2

celeration be an increment of the pressure (or head) northdp

ward, (negative sign due to decreasing northward).

do

[blocks in formation]

To these two conditions of tidal motion must be added

another derived from the principle of fluid continuity. It is not necessary here to introduce the analytical expression.

It is clear that the pressure, the differential coefficients of which are expressed by equations (A), will (divided by the gravity or weight of the water) be so much height taken from or added to the tidal rise expressed by I., II., III., so that, for the diurnal tide, for instance, we should have y II.+, in which the diurnal currents only are

[ocr errors][merged small]

5 5-38'

The secular disturbance expressed by I. is so slowly developed that (Thomson and Tait, Nat. Philos., 2 844) it may in all cases be expressed with sufficient accuracy by I., multiplied by the coefficient which, for the case of nature (8, nearly) differs little from unity. The equilibrium configuration indicated by Diagram II. for the diurnal tide has its axis of figure at e normal to the plane of the paper; a situation quite incompatible with the relative motion around the earth's axis of this figure as an ordinary wave. It may be regarded, however, as a sta tionary wave developing itself meridionally between the northern and southern hemispheres, the equator being the locus of its "nodes," and its phases varying progressively from meridian to meridian. It can, however, be shown (see Proceedings A. A. A. S., 1876) that (if the ocean be continuous and the depth uniform) the relative motions of the water due to a shifting of the axis of diurnal rotation of the fluid (as if it were a solid shell), through the angle

This stationary wave, rising and falling synchronously with the waxing and waning of the forces which generate it, would tend, however, to an indefinitely increased development, as Laplace's analyses show, were it not for the counteracting resistances of friction, etc.

The motion (progressive) of the folds of a shaken carpet, or of the waves seen rolling up our sea-beaches, is, as regards formmotion, illustrative of the ordinary wave; that of a vibrating ! string with "nodal points " (see art. VIBRATION, Fig. 6) illustrates the stationary wave.

which exactly neutralizes II. (the lunar attraction), and reduces y to zero. The expressions just given for the displacements u and v indicate an elliptical orbit, very much elongated meridionally as we approach the equator (where it is purely a meridional oscillation) to each particle. It appears by the foregoing that the motion in such an orbit more or less completely neutralizes the diurnal (II.) tideproducing force.

In what precedes is found the rationale of Laplace's discovery, that for uniform ocean-depths there is no diurnal tide. It relates to a continuous ocean, and depends upon the exclusion of the right ascension and declination motion of the attracting body. A continuous change in the angle of separation is made necessary by the latter-a change which cannot be effected without disturbing this equalization of pressures by which the diurnal tide is neutralized. The right-ascensional motion is even more incompatible with the theorems. This celebrated dictum expresses, therefore, a mere mechanical theorem alien to essential conditions under which the "tides" of nature are generated.

With regard to the semi-diurnal tide, III., supposing a uniform depth to a continuous ocean, or an ocean limited by parallels of latitude equidistant from the equator, or, finally, a depth increasing from nothing at the poles, with the sin of the polar distance, we find that elevations (or depressions) and motions corresponding to a wave of semidiurnal period having the same neutral lines as Fig. III., fulfil the condition y = III.+2. But, curiously, for small or even moderate depths these elevations and depressions under certain circumstances change places. "By a remarkable singularity, the low water takes place when the two bodies" (sun and moon)" are in the meridian, and the high water when they are in the horizon; so that the tide subsides, at the equator, under the body that attracts it." (Méc. Céleste, Bowditch.)

g

The kind of motion required for this tide may be inferred by reference to Diagram III., considered as representing a wholly fluid spheroid revolving around its axis PP'. In this case it is that of a minute approximation of normally equidistant meridional planes toward the meridian under or opposite the moon (where there is high tide), and an eloignment of those at right angles (low tide). As a consequence, the former are moving slower, the latter faster, than the earth's rotation; both, however, by differences quite inappreciable. If there be, however, a solid nucleus with uniform ocean depth, and we conceive the water down to the bottom divided by equidistant meridians, their relative motions to produce the same elevations will become quite sensible, and, through the equations (A), give rise to meridional motions which importantly augment the development of these elevations. The waters on the meridians of low tide will be running east-those on meridians where there is high water running west, or retrograde; at the place of mean elevation the current will be slack. And were it the question of a cylindrical instead of a spherical surface, this would be throughout a true wave-motion, as it will be so quite nearly on the earth's surface between the tropics, where the elliptical orbits of the fluid particles lie nearly in vertical planes, of which the range from low to high water is the dimension of the conjugate diameter. The single case which furnishes a finite integral (i. e. when the depth increases from pole to equator as sine) illustrates this. The meridional motion disappears at the equator, and the oscillation becomes that of a true wave. motion, increasing the centrifugal force at place of low water and increasing it at high water, has the same tendency as the superficial elliptical motion of the diurnal

This

tide to diminish the tidal elevations; but the range of these tides, when resistances are disregarded, depends not upon what motion the foreign attraction, opposed by resistances, is capable of generating and maintaining, but upon what, when initially impressed, that attraction can maintain. Thus (Airy, Tides and Waves, 100) they increase indefinitely as the equatorial depth at the equator diminishes to about seven miles; become negative (i. e. inverted-a "singularity" already alluded to), diminishing from indefinitely great to small negative magnitude as depth farther increases. But such are not the tides of nature, wherein the resistances to motion control all approach to indefinite magnitude of development, in retarding or accelerating the time of high water, corresponding to the above theoretical"direct" or "inverted" wave.

first sketched by Dr. Young, for comparison of theory with observation at certain places, and for investigation of the diurnal tide. The "theory" with which their observations are compared is the equilibrium theory. "By referring the tide not to the moon's preceding transit, but to one of one, two, or more days preceding, the theory is brought in near accordance with observed irregularities in the heights and times of the tides due to changes in the moon's parallax; but in one respect it is unsatisfactory, ... for at the same place different anterior epochs are required for the several irregularities."

Both the equilibrium" theory (Bernouilli) and the "dynamic" theory (Laplace) neglect friction and other resistances to the motion of the water. Under this aspect of the problem the foreign attraction does no work. InThey are motions which once initially established will be maintained, the foreign attraction being merely the agent of interchange of vis viva between different parts of the fluid mass. Such, at least, is the state in which Laplace ultimately leaves the problem-a defective basis for an otherwise defective solution. Hence the crests (positive or negative) of the tidal elevations are always exactly under the attracting body. But when resistances are taken into account, the foreign attraction must do work; but to do "work" it is essential that the tidal crests should lag behind the meridian of the luminary. Dr. Young has exhibited by analysis this "lagging," of which he says, "for this simple reason only (i. e. the resistance encountered) the highest spring tides ought to be a day later than the conjunction and opposition of the luminaries." Mr. Airy's wave-theory also exhibits it. Besides which, there is the retardation due to the time of travelling of the tide as a free wave to the point of observation from that part of the ocean where it is actually generated. In the Atlantic the diurnal tides are believed to come mainly as waves from the great Southern Ocean, and to be one and a half days old when they reach our shores.

From the foregoing we readily conclude that the "dy-deed, the resulting tides themselves are not their work. namic theory," the results of which have been sketched, is equally at fault with the equilibrium theory as an exponent of the tides of the actual oceans. Indeed, to quote the language of its illustrious author, "The irregularity of the depth of the ocean, the manner in which it is spread over the earth, the position and declivity of the shores, their connections with the adjoining coasts, the currents and the resistances which the waters suffer, cannot possibly be submitted to accurate calculation, though these causes modify the oscillations of this great fluid mass." (Ibid. See also article LAPLACE.) The theoretical investigation of the celebrated Dr. Thomas Young appeared nearly at the same time as the last (5th) volume of the Mécanique Céleste. "He distinguishes the results of the forced and free oscillations of the sea; the former resulting from the direct action of the sun and moon, combined with the rotation of the earth, and whose periods of rise and fall are determined solely by those external causes (external, I mean, to the mass of the ocean); the free waves, on the contrary, derived from the former, are transmitted with velocities depending on the mechanism of the fluid itself, on its depth, and on the resistances arising from friction to which those motions are exposed." This work of Dr. Young's, rather a sketch than a full development (Encyc. Brit., 6th, 7th, and 8th eds.), anticipates Mr. Airy's wave-theory, and though not carried out to the same detail of application, the results are "generally coincident."

It remains to notice the "wave-theory" of Mr. Airy (Eneye. Metrop.). The link between "waves" and the "tides " is found in the determination of the law which defines the "forced" wave, for which the periodically waxing and waning action of the sun or moon shall supply the needed force. The dynamic theory, indeed, seeks this in the most general manner; but, except in a few restricted cases, it fails, or rather it attempts more than our mathematics can carry out and give expression for. It is easily accomplished for canals of uniform section; and by considering ocean tides as "waves in canals," expressions for their development can be obtained with a completeness of detail far exceeding what the "dynamic theory" has yielded. "Its great and important defect," in the words of its author, "as applied to the explanation of the tides of the earth, is that, in the case of nature, the water is not distributed over the surface of the earth in canals of uniform breadth and depth, or in any form very nearly resembling them." But, besides ocean tides, the wave-theory deals with an important class of tidal phenomena with which none other can deal-viz. the propagation of free waves, originating in the ocean tides, up tidal rivers and estuaries.

A reference to the article TIDES, OCEANIC WAVES, etc., or a glance at the "tidal charts" of an atlas of physical geography, will show that even our Atlantic does not offer the longitudinal scope necessary for the large semi-diurnal tides which are observed on its shores. "They are but the offspring of the great parent tide from the Pacific" (or rather the great Southern Ocean), and as waves they reach our shores. Hence a "wave-theory" would seem to be the true instrument of analysis. But Mr. Airy tells us "the power of mathematics fails totally in the attempt to express the transmission of the tide-wave or waves through the Atlantic Ocean. It has some analogy to a canal, . . . but not so much as to enable us to predict what will become of the tide-wave in its general progress; and of course the analogy fails totally as regards the effect of these very important features which have no existence in a canal; huge promontories projecting into its sides, or vast bays opening large lateral expanses for the spread of the tide-wave."

Dr. Young demanded for the application of his theory a "series of minutely accurate observations," of which there was at that date an almost absolute destitution. Mr. Lubbock took up this matter in 1829 (see Philos. Trans., 1831), and was soon followed by Mr. Whewell. Their joint researches extend through ten successive volumes (183144) of the Philosophical Transactions. To them we are indebted for the chart of co-tidal lines (see article TIDES),

The great continental barriers are meridional in their extension. They lie across the track of the semi-diurnal waves in all but high southern latitudes, in non-accordance with the conditions which the Laplace solutions impose. The semi-diurnal tides of these oceans could only be theoretically arrived at by the methods first pointed out by Dr. Young. The Southern Ocean presents, however, zones of continuous longitudinal water-surface, and from these in great degree our Atlantic tides are believed to proceed; the great exaggeration of height they show at certain localities being attributed to the action upon them, as "free waves," of shore or bottom configuration.

The diurnal wave has been spoken of as a "stationary wave" of meridional development. For such development both the great oceans offer ranges almost from pole to pole. They furnish scope for the development of this tide on the equilibrium theory-they are wanting in the conditions requisite to the very peculiar motion of Laplace's dynamic theory.

"If," says Mr. Airy, "we look to the Pacific Ocean with reference to diurnal tides, and consider the Southern Sea as a part of it, we seem to have a case which possesses considerable analogy with Laplace's assumption. Yet it is remarkable that here we appear to find a more complete failure than anywhere else of Laplace's celebrated result as to the non-existence of diurnal tide (all the large diurnal tides being in that sea). It is true that this failure might be explained by supposing the depth of the sea to be extremely unequal."

We have seen that in order that there should be rise or fall of this tide, according to Laplace's solution, a contiunously increasing (or decreasing) depth from equator to poles is demanded, they being due to the bodily moving of ocean masses as rigidly solid on to shoaler (or deeper) sea-bottoms. Such a tidal rise and fall is evidently out of the question, except under the absolute and complete existence of the conditions Laplace's solution is based upon; and it is moreover evident that mere irregularity of bottom, without continuously progressive shoaling or deepening from equator to poles, would not alone greatly interfere with Laplace's result for that case.

On our Pacific coast, and almost everywhere in the Pacific, the diurnal tide is of considerable magnitude, and as well marked and regular in its developments as is the semi-diurnal tide. On the Atlantic coast, where the regu

Hence the "retardation" of the earth's rotation by tidal friction, as propounded by M. Delaunay to account for a part of the moon's apparent "acceleration," for which Mr. Adams has shown Laplace's discovery (see LAPLACE) does not account,

The requisite shifting of rotation-axis of the water, as that of a continuous and solid shell, is of course out of the question; nevertheless, throughout these oceans the shore outline is not wholly incompatible with the requisite horizontal elliptical orbits of the fluid particles.

« ZurückWeiter »