Imagens da página
PDF
ePub

MODERN PROSE

THE recent English writers have produced essays so interesting and so varied that selection is more or less arbitrary. The frank reëxamination of society, its traditions, its institutions, its mores, has encouraged the essay as well as the novel, and the noisy highway of our modern life is thus brought into review, along with pleasant excursions here and there into the cool gardens and the quiet by-ways of traditional experience.

Arthur Christopher Benson (1862- ) was the son of an Archbishop of Canterbury, and one of three brothers to distinguish themselves in literature. Eton and Cambridge bred, from twenty-three to forty-one he was a master at Eton. The Upton Letters are the product of those years, and voice in the gentlest spirit the author's "profound misgivings as to the nature of the intellectual process known by the name of secondary education." He was then made a don at Magdalen College, Cambridge, a position which he still holds. The quiet, friendly, simple life of a small English college, with its gentleness and serenity, and its reverence for the past is nicely accommodated to the genius of Benson. "I found myself," he says in the opening pages of From a College Window, "at once at home in my small and beautiful college, rich with all kinds of ancient and venerable traditions, in buildings of humble and subtle grace. The little dark-roofed chapel, where I have a stall of my own; the galleried hall, with its armorial glass; the low, book-lined library; the panelled, combination-room, with its dim portraits of old worthies: how sweet a setting for a quiet life. Then, too, I have my own spacious rooms, with a peaceful outlook into a big close, half orchard, half garden, with bird-haunted thickets and immemorial trees, bounded by a slow river."

As a biographer and literary historian, John, first Viscount Morley of Blackburn (1838-1923), displayed the same honest sense of reality and the same clear, frank, independent judgment which actuated him as a statesman to support the Irish Nationalists, to uphold the Boers, and, as a pacifist, to resign from the cabinet upon the opening of the World War. Morley is a singularly reliable biographer because he rigorously studies the contemporary life and then motivates the conduct of his subject. His style is flowing, but firm.

James, first Viscount Bryce of Dechmont (1838-1922), author of The American Commonwealth and British Ambassador to the United States from 1907 to 1913, is one of the few Englishmen who have really understood America and Americans, and he showed that he knew us almost better than we know ourselves. Certainly he interpreted our political institutions with more accuracy and insight than has any American. Fortunately his style, lucid, condensed, and brilliant, is equally as distinguished as his scholarship, and guarantees the permanency of his writings. His tribute to Lincoln's style leaves nothing further to be said for it.

"We have not had in our time," says Christopher Morley, "a more natural-born essayist, of the scampering sort, than Hilaire Belloc. He is an infectious fellow: if you read him much you will find yourself trying to imitate him; there is no harm in doing

so; he himself caught the trick from Rabelais." Born in France of French and English parentage, Belloc (1870- ) was brought up in Sussex, educated at Balliol College, Oxford, served for a time in the French field artillery, and was in Parliament from 1906-1910. His historical works are permeated with Roman Catholic sympathies. His books of the open road and of homely things are sensitively observant, and have the pleasant leisureliness and the gentle grace of our own David Grayson.

Quiller-Couch, Sir Arthur Thomas (1863- ), King Edward VII Professor of English Literature, Cambridge University, is best known to Americans through his fine anthology, The Oxford Book of English Verse. Every college student, however, should know his delightful books, The Art of Reading and The Art of Writing, in which he discusses the study of literature and of composition in a most friendly and informal way, absolutely relieved from the pedantry which throttles most American books on these subjects. The essay on Style is taken from The Art of Writing.

Bernard Shaw has pronounced Samuel Butler (1825-1902) to be "in his own department the greatest English writer of the latter half of the nineteenth century." (Of course we need not be told whom Mr. Shaw regards as the greatest writer in another department.) Shaw's voice is only one in the mighty chorus of noisy praise from the throats of the Butlerites. Ironical, iconoclastic, egotistical, and aggressive, Butler created a veritable furor among the would-be-emancipated upon the posthumous publication of his complete works a few years back. His vogue for a time was very great and is yet considerable.

Conservative parents are much troubled about the modern novels that their sons and daughters read in college. "What are we coming to," they say, "and why do instructors assign such books?" H. G. Wells (1866- ) gives the answer in The Novel of Today. This generation is determined to look life in the face, and Wells's own novels are worked overtime in helping it to do so. Whether any of the novels of Wells possess the vital spark, his influence upon the fiction of the time has been second to none in our time.

Augustine Birrell (1850- ) has been one of the distinguished literary essayists of the period. He has had a great sympathy for the intimate writers of English literature, particularly Hazlitt and Lamb. As continuing the tradition of the miscellaneous essayist, his series, Obiter Dicta, has been a source of joy to those who have liked to read about books and the authors of books.

Gilbert Keith Chesterton (1874

) is one of the outstanding writers of prose and verse, delighting in paradox and racy English. He has won distinction in the field of journalism as well as in more formal literature. No other of our generation has produced more stimulating prose to the delight of thoughtful readers, for example his Heretics, Paradoxes, and his sympathetic studies of Browning and Dickens.

As a writer of sentiment, James M. Barrie (1860- ) stands without a peer among the writers of to-day. At first a journalist, then novelist, then dramatist, Barrie has drawn to himself a host of admiring readers by his whimsical humor and his simple portrayal of Scottish scenes and Scottish characters. In Margaret Ogilvy he painted a sympathetic picture of his mother, never to be forgotten among the autobiographical books of our literature. In Peter and Wendy Barrie has added characters to our already notable list of children in fiction that are distinguished for their truthfulness and charm.

John Galsworthy (1867- ) has produced plays and novels. He writes with distinction on subjects which go to the bottom of present-day society. Notable among his novels is his Forsythe Saga, a series portraying the ups and downs of an interesting group of related characters. It is fitting that this book of English literature should close with a selection from so distinguished a writer of good English, which conveys so clearly the fact that the fullest life is the life where beauty and truth are transcendent.

JAMES BRYCE

ABRAHAM LINCOLN AS ORATOR AND LETTER-WRITER

No man since Washington has become to Americans so familiar or so beloved a figure as Abraham Lincoln. He is to them the representative and typical American, the man who best embodies the political ideals of the nation. He is typical in the fact that he sprang from the masses of the people, that he remained through his whole career a man of the people, that his chief desire was to be in accord with the beliefs and wishes of the people, that he never failed to trust in the people and to rely on their support. Every native American knows his life and his speeches. His anecdotes and witticisms have passed into the thought and the conversation of the whole nation as those of no other statesman have done.

He belongs, however, not only to the United States, but to the whole of civilised mankind. It is no exaggeration to say that he has, within the last thirty years, grown to be a conspicuous figure in the history of the modern world. Without him, the course of events, not only in the Western hemisphere but in Europe also, would have been different, for he was called to guide at the greatest crisis of its fate a State already mighty, and now far more mighty than in his days, and the guidance he gave has affected the march of events ever since. A life and a character such as his ought to be known to and comprehended by Europeans as well as by Americans. Among Europeans, it is especially Englishmen who ought to appreciate him and understand the significance of his life, for he came of an English stock, he spoke the English tongue, his action told upon the progress of events and the shaping of opinion in all British communities everywhere more than it has done upon any other nation outside America itself.

Lincoln's speeches make him known by his words as readers of history know him by his deeds. In popularly-governed

countries the great statesman is almost of necessity an orator, though his eminence as a speaker may be no true measure either of his momentary power or of his permanent fame, for wisdom, courage and tact bear little direct relation to the gift for speech. But whether that gift be present in greater or in lesser degree, the character and ideas of a statesman are best studied through his own words. This is particularly true of Lincoln, because he was not what may be called a professional orator. There have been famous orators whose speeches we may read for the beauty of their language or for the wealth of ideas they contain, with comparatively little regard to the circumstances of time and place that led to their being delivered. Lincoln is not one of these. His speeches need to be studied in close relation to the occasions which called them forth. They are not philosophical lucubrations or brilliant displays of rhetoric. They are a part of his life. They are the expression of his convictions, and derive no small part of their weight and dignity from the fact that they deal with grave and urgent questions, and express the spirit in which he approached those questions. Few great characters stand out so clearly revealed by their words, whether spoken or written, as he does.

Accordingly Lincoln's discourses are not like those of nearly all the men whose eloquence has won them fame. When we think of such men as Pericles, Demosthenes, Eschines, Cicero, Hortensius, Burke, Sheridan, Erskine, Canning, Webster, Gladstone, Bright, Massillon, Vergniaud, Castelar, we think of exuberance of ideas or of phrases, of a command of appropriate similes or metaphors, of the gifts of invention and of exposition, of imaginative flights, or outbursts of passion fit to stir and rouse an audience to like passion. We think of the orator as gifted with a powerful or finely-modulated voice, an imposing presence, a graceful delivery. Or if remembering that Lincoln was by profession a lawyer and practised until he became President of the United States we think of the special gifts which mark

the forensic orator, we should expect to find a man full of ingenuity and subtlety, one dexterous in handling his case in such wise as to please and capture the judge or the jury whom he addresses, one skilled in those rhetorical devices and strokes of art which can be used, when need be, to engage the listener's feelings and distract his mind from the real merits of the issue.

Of all this kind of talent there was in Lincoln but little. He was not an artful pleader; indeed, it was said of him that he could argue well only those cases in the justice of which he personally believed, and was unable to make the worse appear the better reason. For most of the qualities which the world admires in Cicero or in Burke we should look in vain in Lincoln's speeches. They are not fine pieces of exquisite diction, fit to be declaimed as school exercises or set before students as models of composition.

What, then, are their merits? and why do they deserve to be valued and remembered? How comes it that a man of first-rate powers was deficient in qualities appertaining to his own profession which men less remarkable have possessed?

To answer this question, let us first ask what were the preparation and training Abraham Lincoln had for oratory, whether political or forensic.

Born in rude and abject poverty, he had never any education, except what he gave himself, till he was approaching manhood. Not even books wherewith to inform and train his mind were within his reach. No school, no university, no legal faculty, had any part in training his powers. When he became a lawyer and a politician, the years most favourable to continuous study had already passed, and the opportunities he found for reading were very scanty. He knew but few authors in general literature, though he knew those few thoroughly. He taught himself a little mathematics, but he could read no language save his own, and can have had only the faintest acquaintance with European history or with any branch of philosophy.

The want of regular education was not made up for by the persons among whom

his lot was cast. Till he was a grown man, he never moved in any society from which he could learn those things with which the mind of an orator or a statesman ought to be stored. Even after he had gained some legal practice, there was for many years no one for him to mix with except the petty practitioners of a petty town, men nearly all of whom knew little more than he did himself.

Schools gave him nothing, and society gave him nothing. gave him nothing. But he had a powerful intellect and a resolute will. Isolation fostered not only self-reliance but the habit of reflection, and, indeed, of prolonged and intense reflection. He made all that he knew a part of himself. He thought everything out for himself. His convictions were his own clear and coherent. He was not positive or opinionated, and he did not deny that at certain moments he pondered and hesitated long before he decided on his course. But though he could keep a policy in suspense, waiting for events to guide him, he did not waver. He paused and reconsidered, but it was never his way either to go back upon a decision once made, or to waste time in vain regrets that all he expected had not been attained. He took advice readily, and left many things to his ministers; but he did not lean upon his advisers. Without vanity or ostentation, he was always independent, self-contained, prepared to take full responsibility for his acts.

His

That he was keenly observant of all that passed under his eyes, that his mind played freely round everything it touched, we know from the accounts of his talk, which first made him famous in the town and neighbourhood where he lived. humour, and his memory for anecdotes which he could bring out to good purpose, at the right moment, are qualities which Europe deems distinctively American, but no great man of action in the nineteenth century, even in America, possessed them in the same measure. Seldom has so acute a power of observation been found united to so abundant a power of sympathy.

These remarks may seem to belong to a

study of his character rather than of his speeches, yet they are not irrelevant, because the interest of his speeches lies in their revelation of his character. Let us, however, return to his speeches and his letters, some of which are scarcely less noteworthy than are the speeches.

What are the distinctive merits of these speeches and letters? There is less humour in them than his reputation as a humorist would have led us to expect. They are serious, grave, practical. We feel that the man does not care to play over the surface of the subject, or to use it as a way of displaying his cleverness. He is trying to get right down to the very foundation of the matter and tell us what his real thoughts about it are. In this respect he sometimes reminds us of Bismarck's speeches, which, in their rude, broken, forthdarting way, always go straight to their destined aim; always hit the nail on the head. So too, in their effort to grapple with fundamental facts, Lincoln's bear a sort of likeness to Cromwell's speeches, though Cromwell has far less power of utterance, and always seems to be wrestling with the difficulty of finding language to convey to others what is plain, true, and weighty to himself. This difficulty makes the great Protector, though we can usually see what he is driving at, frequently confused and obscure. Lincoln, however, is always clear. Simplicity, directness, and breadth are the notes of his thought. Aptness, clearness, and again simplicity are the notes of his diction. The American speakers of his generation, like most of those of the preceding generation, but unlike those of that earlier generation to which Alexander Hamilton, John Adams, Marshall, and Madison belonged, were generally infected by a floridity which made them a by-word in Europe. Even men of brilliant talent, such as Edward Everett, were by no means free from this straining after effect by highly-coloured. phrases and theatrical effects. Such faults have to-day virtually vanished from the United States, largely from a change in public taste, to which perhaps the example set by Lincoln himself may have

contributed. In the forties and fifties florid rhetoric was rampant, especially in the West and South, where taste was less polished than in the older States. That Lincoln escaped it is a striking mark of his independence as well as of his greatness. There is no superfluous ornament in his orations, nothing tawdry, nothing otiose. For the most part, he addresses the reason of his hearers, and credits them with desiring to have none but solid arguments laid before them. When he does appeal to emotion, he does it quietly, perhaps even solemnly. The note struck is always a high note. The impressiveness of the appeal comes not from fervid vehemence of language, but from the sincerity of his own convictions. Sometimes one can see that through its whole course the argument is suffused by the speaker's feeling, and when the time comes for the feeling to be directly expressed, it glows not with fitful flashes, but with the steady heat of an intense and strenuous soul.

The impression which most of the speeches leave on the reader is that their matter has been carefully thought over even when the words have not been learnt by heart. But there is an anecdote that on one occasion, early in his career, Lincoln went to a public meeting not in the least. intending to speak, but presently being called for by the audience, rose in obedience to the call, and delivered a long address so ardent and thrilling that the reporters dropped their pencils and, absorbed in watching him, forgot to take down what he said. It has also been stated, on good authority, that on his way in the railroad cars to the dedication of the monument on the field of Gettysburg, he turned to a Pennsylvanian gentleman who was sitting beside him and remarked, "I suppose I shall be expected to say something this afternoon; lend me a pencil and a bit of paper," and that he thereupon jotted down the notes of a speech which has become the best known and best remembered of all his utterances, so that some of its words and sentences have passed into the minds of all educated men everywhere.

« AnteriorContinuar »