« ZurückWeiter »
BAIL. See Appeal.
liver an article unintentionally left in store, is prima
negligenco; depreciation of securities. Whiton v.
own use of the proceeds of a note by a bankrupt by
by holder of unaccepted check not maintainable.
posit. First National Bank of Lock Haven v. Mason
notes ; negotiable instrument;indorsement by part-
ment for customer; custom; current funds; grace.
deposited by debtor as his own. Wood v. Boylston
alleged bastard child to be exhibited to jury to
the lives of their members. State of Missouri v.
pons. McGrath v. Van Stavoren (N. Y. C. P.)...... 271
dorsee; entry under second bill; liability of ware-
ing bonds in excess of power do not render bonds
a reasonable tinio after due. Williamsport Gas Co.
See Appeal; Municipal Corporations ; Suretyship.
of act of 1851, ch. 122, 8 7. Erie Co. Savings Bank v.
ation, what necessary to authorize. Grangers' Ins.
CARRIER OF PASSENGERS-Continued. PAGE
street railroad resulting from sitting on front plat-
form. Wills v. Lynn & B. R. R. Co. (Mass. S. C.) 498
v. Metrop. Dist. Railway Co. (Eng. App.)
does not include drinker. Brooks
for moneys deposited in proceedings for confiscation.
previous assignment for creditors in another State.
want of jurisdiction; divorce. Morey v. Morey
(Minn. S. C.).....
into State to serve process. Wood v. Wood (Ky.
mails and recovered ; trust deed of property stolen.
Laws v. Burt (Mass. S. C.)...
evidence showing want of jurisdiction. State of
man's Trusts (Eng. Ch. D.).....
Farnie (Eng. Pro. and A. D.)....
comity – will not be exercised to deprive citizen of
not be felony to avoid contract McMahon v. Smith
goods of consignee at one time, right of action by
cation of, by people. Matter of Indiana Constitu-
use ; assessment for sidewalk not. White v. People
Houston & Tex. C. R. R. Co. v. Odom (Tex. S. C.) 157
owners unconstitutional. Woolever v. Stewart
cannot take away property rights from. City of De-
moval of dead bodies valid. In re Wong Yung Quy
Dock & Imp. Co. v. Trustees of Public Schools
removing from office; “misfeasance in office." Com-
monwealth v. Williams (Ky, App.)
change term and ccmpensation. State ex rel. Martin
v. Kalb (Wis. S. C.)..
tion. Morley y. Thayer (U.S.C. C., Mass.)
valid; New York city. Long v. Mayor (N. Y. App.).. 196
poses. Dyar v. Farmington (Me. S. C.).
Federal jurisdiction. Louisville & U. R. R. Co.
CARRIER OF ANIMALS. Liability beyond his
own line. Stewart v. Terre Haute & Ind. R. R. Co.
shipped by consignee of owner; when lien attaches.
trusted to him. Dinsmore v. Louisville, New A. & C.
merchandise as baggage. Pennsylvania Co. v. Miller
senger in Pullman car. Pennsylvania Co. v. Koy (U.
must be provided by officers of steamboat. Eagle
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - Continued. PAGE.
judgment. State ex rel. Ranger v. New Orleans
remedy. Hardin's Adm'r v. Taylor (Ky. App.)...... 457
frontage and area valid. Cleveland v. Tripp (R. I.
ing defenses and is valid. Mosby v. St. Louis M.
tempt in action for divorce. Walker v. Walker (N.
juris and publici juris. Ladd y. Southern Cotton P.
subscription. Burr & Hyde v. American S. S. Co. (N.
parol proof to contradict. Hubbard v. Marshall
rescinding of contract. Heckman v. Swartz (Wis.
interest in lands; statute of frauds, $ 4; executed
consideration. Alderson v. Maddison (Eng. Ex. D.), 419
tion to influence voters. Harvey v. Tama County
sion dependent on. Clements v. Yturria (N. Y. App.) 155
private messages free of charge, against public
delivery. Marx v. Ellsworth (Tex. Comin. App.).... 19
Law: Corporations ; Eviction; Firtures; Husbanal
Sale; Statute of Frauds;
by land-owner, when buildings personal property.
to real estate. Detroit & B. C. R. R: Co. v. Burch
sideration of marriage not voluntary. National
not presumption of acceptance of deed. Herring v.
does not constitute fraud. Carr v. Breese (N. Y.
Jently selling, protected. Beurman v. Van Buren
pattern not a piratical copy of an engraving from
the same design. Dicks v. Brooks (Eng. App.).... 322
owners ; injunction when will not issue. Scribner
picture in ; when does not constitute a breach.
of old ; liability for wrongful issue; dividends.
corporation. Lothian v. Wood (Cal. S. C.)... 275
bind, and contracts not implied from their declara-
new company. Thornton v. Wabash R’y Co. (N. Y.
under a forged transfer; estoppel. Sim V. Anglo-
over; assignment of stock. Philadelphia & R. C. &
wrongful issue of certificate. Strange v. Houston
& T. C. Ry. Co. (Tex. S. C.)...
tical Society v. London & P. S. Asso. (Eng. App.).... 158
tion allowable, though not existing when action
commenced. Howard v. Johnston (N. Y, App.)... 433
out; carrier of goods; liability for damage to goods
See Removal of Causes.
See Ancient Lights; Lease.
dependent on wife's consent; evidence; husband
born aster. Egbert v. Greenwalt (Mich. S. C.).. 376
drug ; name of drug need not be stated in indict-
former conviction. State of Maine v. Littlefield
criminal act; no implied assent ; unlawful act not
of dangerous character. Lamb v. People (III. S. C.). 418
by; evidence ; testimony of deceased witness admis-
renders incompetent. People v. Hodgdon (Cal.
determine degree of crime. Willis v. Commissioner
ion as to guilt. Henze v. People (N. Y. App.)... 433
acts of like character, when admissible. Trogden v.
be a" store-keeper" and obtaining goods is guilty
DELIVERY. What does not constitute; ungathered
See Vendor and Purchaser.
estoppel; acquiescence. Loud v. Loud (Mass. S.C.), 235
holder of note. State of Iowa v. Davis (Iowa S. C.). 98
must be proven įtlight not evidence of guilt. Fox
vitiate acts of jury; statutory construction. United
when it will and when it will not be. State of Con.
goods may be indicted together. Commonwealth
priated is. Ducker v. State (Oregon S. C.).... 182
sale or return not bailee. Krause v. Comm. (Penn.
money back at cards; former owner taking posses-
aver; pleading Rhode Island v. Hines (R. I. S. C.) 237
band ; husband and wife ; statutory construction.
removal of cause. State v. Post (U.S. C. C., Ga.). 318
for, without any other punishment. Castro v. Queen
"larceny;" idem 80ndns. People v. St. Clair (Cal.
convicted when active in crime ; joint indictment of
offenders invalid. Flynn v. State (Tex. App.) 357
them error; evidence; foot-prints. Bouldin v. State
against each other as witnesses for prosecution.
of exclusion from court room. Hey v. Comm. (Va.
EASEMENTS. How acquired; use having origin in
quired; evidence of actual notice; notice to agent.
See Right of Way.
tween houses in close proximity. Falvey v. Elliott
(Bull. S. C.)
See Adverse Possession.
when unconstitutional. Dells v. Kennedy (Wis. S.
course by city for purpose of general drainage not
v. Mayor (Del. App.)..
measure of damages, Central Br. Un. P. R. R. Co.
Executor ; Former Adjudication : Married Woman,
Negotiable Instruments; Suretyship; Usury.
contract. Stenbeck v. Latta ( Buff. S. C.)......
committee. Ctursla v. Frieccia (Eng. H. of L.)......
any of testimony competent Board of Education
v. Keenan (Cal. S. C.)....
condition. Toomes' Estate (Cal. S. C.)
counsel for the accused, on the question of his in-
sanity State v. Iloyt (Conn. S. C.)
joint debtors; declarations by one do not bind
others. Wallis v. Randall (N. Y. App.).....
sale not. Flanagan v. Maddin (N. Y. App.)...
tioned as to illicit intercourse with others. Smith
v. Garagan (Ind. S. C.)
tion competent. Fisher y. Green (Ill. S. C.)..
ble. O'Connor V. Chicago, M. & St, P. R. Co.
(Minn. S. C.)....
determined by State law and when not. Pottery
Third Nat. Bank (U.S.S. C.).
sions. Erickson v. Bell (Iowa S. C.)
Conversation ; Criminal Law; Insurance, Life, S;
Usage ; Will, Witness,
ple v. Morrison (N. Y. S. C.)....
cludes; estoppel; practice. Kennedy v. "Crasswell
(U.S. S. C.)....
DAMAGES. Measure of, in action for waste for min-
ing coal. Franklin Coal Co. v. McMillan (Md.)....... 2
Municipal Corporations ; Slander.
on money loaned in his hands. Dougherty v. Cen-
when effective : when question for jury. Jones v.
HUSBAND AND WIFE - Continued
of note it was given to secure; jurisdiction. Mers-
Criminal Law; Married Woman; Mechanics' Lien;
directly impeached. Barrows v. National Rubber
piano are household furniture, and exempt from.
to exemption not waived by neglect to claim it. Mc-
oner under civil process; "offense," what is, within
demanded. State of North Carolina v. Perry (D.C.
contract of purchase. Hinkley & E. Iron Co. v.
of mortgage to foreclose ; payment of judgment by
Dougherty v. Remington Paper Co. (N. Y. App.)..... 273
to lay track through city; right need not be exclu-
road. East Tenn., Va. & Ga. R. R. Co. v. Hamblin
expectation." Nevill v. Snelling (Eng. Ch. D).
GAMBLING. Statutory construction; poker not
game like faro, keno, etc. Nuckolls v. Comm. (Va.
acceptance; when not transferable. King v. Batter-
what does not constitute jurisdiction ; infant sur-
Guardianship of Hubbard Infants (N. Y. App.) .... 315
ity in drawing juror does not vitiate acts of jury.
See Criminal Law,
tion to public. Talbott v. Richmond & D. R. R. Co.
ground; use of part of premises for business pur-
poses. Hogan v. Manners (Kans. S. C.)..........
maintainable between. Hobbs v. Hobbs (Me. S. C.), 73
ity of husband. Biery v. Ziegler (Penn. S. C.). 398
necessaries; revocation of implied authority. Deben.
to pledge his credit for articles suitable to her
ICE. See Negligence.
Woman; Parent and Chill; Pleading.
to restrain another in same court. Mann v. Flower
from running cars on rails made, without having
one negligently causing fire; joinder of parties.
Swarthout v. Chicago & N. W. R. R. Co. (Wis. S. C.), 256
be cancelled and note surrendered by agreement of
parties. Acker, Rec'r, v. Hite (Penn. S. C.)... 357
waiver. Critchett v. American Ins. Co. (Iowa 8. C ), 137
not concealed and actually destroyed, company
liable for Austrian case.
ance for another's benefit. Reitenbach v. Johnson
avoiding policy. Southern Mut. Ins. Co. v. Kloeber
ation of insured. Titus v. Glen's Falls Ins. Co. (N.Y.
dor and purchaser. Rayner v. Preston (Eng. Ch. D.) 339
equity may enforce payment; misrepresentation;
to mortgagee ; not defeated by mortgagor's
of loss, does not avoid policy. Dogge v. Northwest-
not. Stupetzki v. Transatlantic F. Ins. Co. (Mich.
tion. American Ins. Co. v. Foster (Ill. S. C.). 164
compromise of loss; misrepresentations as to owner:
ship. Stache v. St. Paul F. & M. Ins. Co. (Wis. S. C.) 37
ing induced by epileptic fit. Winspear v. Accident
child ; stipulation in policy contravening charter of
complying with State laws as to business. Cowardin
habitual drunkard, Odd Fellows Mut. Life Ins. Co. v.
Creditor ; Insolvency; Maritime Law.
when contract held valid. Crawford v. Scovell
See Deed; Statutory Construction.
reluctance of courts to enforce forfeitures. Sea-
Matter of Attorney-General v. Guardian Mutual Life
proceedings to determine priorities; constitutional
dings v. Northwestern Mutual Life Ins. Co. (U. S.
constitutes. Lawton v. Royal Canadian Ins. Co.
but at usual rate. Goodchap v. Roberts (Eng. App.). 218
JOINDER. In actions for tort ; release of one party
when not release of others. Ellis v. Essau (Wis.
tendment. Chappell v. Truscott (Buff. S. C.). 115
river; Federal question. Schoonmaker v. Gilmore
pal bond; acknowledgment of indebtedness. Porter
an assignee when Circuit Court has no jurisdiction.
parties, removal of cause from State court depend-
time torts. Brown y. Gilmore (Penn. S. C.)... ... 338
leasing railroad in another, not citizen of latter
Practice ; Waiver.
See Criminal Law.
MALICIOUS PROSECUTION. Ground of; what
must be shown; failure of prosecution. Thaule v.
Western R. R. Co. v. DeGrail (Minn, S. C.)..
cific examination of claim. People ex rel. Thurston
fully passing over defendants' land; statutory con-
admiralty jurisdiction. Town of Pelham v. Schooner
sponsible; authority of master; nature of instru.
nished after launching, a land contract and lien
ment. Worth v. Steamboat (U. S. D. C., Mo.).
save property. Scaramanga v. Stamp (Eng. App.). 3:9
sanguinity; nephew and aunt; conflict of law.
Campbell v. Crampton (U. S. C. C., N. Y.).... 403
promise. Ditchain v. Worrall (Eng. C. P. D.). 419
sideration. Nat. Exchange Bank v. Watson (R. I.
provided in statute, when no marriage. Common-
countries, and on ship crossing English channel ;
Kerrison (N. Y. Spec. Term)..
of foreign law; presumptions; evidence. Hynes v.
man, which she is not bound to pay, will prove a suffi-
when need not be during coverture : estoppel ; in-
fant not bound by. Sims v. Everhardt (U. S. S. C.), 455
made on husband's credit. Holmes v. Bronson (Mich.
mode ; estoppel. Innis v. Templeton (Pepn. S. C.).
LARCENY. See Criminal Law.
what is an assessment. Budd v. Marshall (Eng.
6.- May be entitled to compensation for services per-
formed in husband's family. Mason v. Dunbar (Mich.