Abbildungen der Seite
PDF
EPUB

U.S.-Congress Senate Committee on Judiciary, Subcommittee on Constitutional Rights. State statutes on wiretapping, 87th Cong., 1st sess., committee print. Washington, U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1961. 110 p. U.S.-Congress Senate Committee on Judiciary, Subcommittee to Investigate Administration of Internal Security Act and Other Internal Security Laws. State Department security, hearings, before Subcommittee, 88th Cong., 1st sess., 1963. In 3 pts., 108 p. Washington, U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1964.

U.S.-Congress-Senate Committee on Judiciary, Subcommittee on Administrative Practice and Procedure. Invasions of privacy. Government agencies. Hearings, 89th Cong., 1st sess., Feb. 18March 3, 1965. Washington, U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1965. 4 Pts. to date, 2082 p.

U.S.-Congress-House Committee on Government Operations. Special Inquiry on Invasion of Privacy, 89th Cong., 1st sess., June, Sept., 1965. Tompkins, Dorothy L. Wiretapping; a selected bibliography. Berkeley, Bureau of Public Administration, University of California, 1955. 30 p.

U.S. Library of Congress. Law Library. American-British Law Division. Wiretapping as evidence in court in Great Britain and the British Commonwealth of Nations. Walter H. Zeydel, AmericanBritish Law Division. Washington, 1958. 56.

New York-State-Legislature. Joint Committee on Privacy of Communications and Licensure of Private Investigators. Report, March 22, 1955-(three annual reports received to date; title varies). New York-State-Temporary Commission of Investigation. Transcript of public hearings concerning the current wiretapping dilemma in New York State created by recent Federal court decisions (April 5 and 6, 1960). New York, 1960. 171 p. Joint Committee on Continuing Legal Education of the American Law Institute and the American Bar Association. The problem of electronic eavesdropping. Philadelphia, 1961. 90 p.

II. BIBLIOGRAPHY OF ARTICLES IN GENERAL PERIODICALS RELATING TO WIRETAPPING AND EAVESDROPPING (APRIL 1951 TO DATE)

General Periodicals-July 1957 to Date

Wiretapping in Britain. 43 U.S. News 43, Jl 19, 1957

We've been asked who can tap wires? 43 U.S. News 62 S 6 '57 Secrets of the electronic snoopers. N. S. Griswold. 171 Pop Sci 126, O '57

We've been asked how private is a telephone? 43 U.S. News 115, D 2 '57

Dirty business. 50 Newsweek 27, D 23 '57

Eavesdropping made easy. Indiana Republicans. 70 Time 62, D 30 '57

Secret sleuths: midget recorders. S. W. Pen. 43 Sci Digest 57, Ja '58 All save two. 138 New Rep 6 Ja 27 '58

Who's listening? electronic eavesdropping and wiretapping. 69 Time 30, My 20 '57

Wiretapping: does it short-circuit our freedom? pro and con discussion. 72 Sr Schol 6, F 7 '58

Congress and wiretapping. R. F. Drinan. 98 America 634, N 1 '58 Government's big ears. C. P. Curtis. 186 Nation 336, Ap 19 '58 Case against wiretapping. 186 Nation 507, Je 7 '58

More on wiretapping. 68 Commonweal 413 Jl 25 '58

Taps, bugs and eavesdropping. W. Parsons. 99 America 506, Ag 16

'58

Brothers, big and little. 71 Commonweal 173, Mr 6 '59
Electronic eavesdropping. 71 Commonweal 560, F 19 '60
Eavesdroppers S. Dash and others. 43 Review Sat R 20, Ap 2 '60
Electronics in crime detection. W. H. Buchsbaum. 64 Elec. World
29, Ap '60

Wiretapping, the quiet revolution. 29 Commentary 333, Ap '60
Wiretapping: lawlessness in law enforcement. L. H. Pollak.
New Repub 13, My 16 '60

142

Is tapping telephones more heinous than searching houses. 233 Sat Eve Post 10, Jl 2 '60

Tangled issues of wiretapping. A Lewis. N Y Times Mag 18, Ag 21 '60

Moral dilemma of wire tapping. S. Dash. 49 Coronet 45, Mr '61 Little ears: eavesdropping behind the iron curtain. 78 Time 25, Jl 28 '61

Mr. Hogan's decision. 145 New Repub 7, N 27 '61

Attorney general's opinion on wiretaps. R. T. Kennedy. N.Y.
Times Mag, Je 3 '62

Wiretapping, a handcuff for crime. 79 Sr Schol 14, Ja 10 '62
Wiretap bill. 146 New Repub 7, F 12 '62

Change the law that fosters crime. T. B. Keating. 80 Read Digest 70, Mr '62

Silent intruder. E. V. Long. 195 Nation 6, J 14 '62
Reply to silent intruder. R. W. Kastenmeier.
cover), Jl 28 '62

Do-it-yourself spying. 147 New Repub 7, O 1 '62
Wiretapping bill. 147 New Repub 6, S. 10 '62
Bug thy neighbor. 83 Time 55, Mr 6 '64

Invasion of privacy. 213 Atlan 61, F '64

195 Nation (inside

Are they listening in on you? E. D. Fales, Jr. 186 Popular Science 96. Jan. '65.

Are you being bugged? B. H. Frisch. 56 Science Digest. July '64. Big Brother is listening: telephone taps and hidden microphones. B. H. Bagdikian. 237 Saturday Evening Post 68. June 6, '64. Electronic privacy. 199 Nation 2. July 13, '64.

Wiretapping: yes or no? F. E. Imbau, H. Schwartz. 82 Christian Century 75. January 20, '65.

Improper practice; investigation of wiretapping by federal employees. 66 Newsweek 23. July 26, '65.

Ordeal of Otto Otepka. C. Stevenson and W. J. Gill, 87 Readers Digest 55. Aug. 9, '65.

T-men's tactics are disallowed: subcommittee investigating IRS agents invasion of privacy. Business Week, July 31, '65.

Speaking out; we must stop tax snooping. E. V. Long, 238 Saturday Evening Post 10. November 20, 1965.

How to be alone; bug-proof conference room. S. V. Jones. 59 Science Digest 20. April, '66.

Science, privacy, and freedom. Alan F. Westin. Atheneum, New York. Winter 1966-67.

III. BIBLIOGRAPHY OF ARTICLES IN LEGAL PERIODICALS RELATING TO WIRETAPPING AND EAVESDROPPING AUGUST 1955 TO DATE

Discretionary denial of police application by New York Court. 1 N Y LF 235, Je '55

Judiciary article of the Constitution and wiretap legislation. M. A. Gordon. 15 Law Guild Rev. 63, Summer '55

Admissibility of evidence obtained as a result of wiretapping. [Commonwealth v. Chaitt (Pa) 112 A 2d 379] 33 U. Det L J 69, N '55 Wiretapping analysis of the law and practice under New York Constitutional and statutory provisions. 31 N Y UL Rev 197, Ja '56

Applicability to interception of messages broadcast by private radio stations [U.S. v. Sugden, 226 F. 2nd 281] 24 Geo Wash L Rev 278, Mr '56

Sacred Curtain, E. W. Tompkins. 60 Dick L Rev 251, Mr '56
Use of intercepted communications in trusts by court-martial. J. P.
Byron. 1956 J A G J 9, Mr '56

Protection against eavesdroppers. A. P. Savarese, Jr. 14 N Y
County B Bull 20, My '56

Illegal interception of communications: eavesdropping and wiretapping. 20 Albany L Rev 193, Je '56

Evidence: wiretapping with consent [People v. Malotte (Cal) 292 P. 2nd 517] 44 Calif L Rev 780, O '56

Admissibility of evidence obtained by wiretapping [U.S. v. White, 228 F. 2nd 832] 42 Ia L Rev 127, Fall '56

Admissibility of telephone converstations overheard on extension phones [Rathbun v. U.S., 236 F 2nd 514] 29 Rocky Mt L Rev 258, F '57

Admissibility of wire-tapped evidence at common law. 58 W Va L Rev 268, Ap '57

Admissibility of tape recording and transcript of it-wiretappingadmissibility of illegally obtained evidence [Regina v. Foll, 21 W W R 481] 35 Can B Rev 558, My '57

Simultaneous overhearing of a conversation via an extension phone held not to be an interception within the federal "wire-tap" statute [Rathbun v. U.S., 236 F 2d 514] 8 Syracuse L Rev 317, Spring '57 Federal jurisdiction under the commerce clause and intrastate extortion. 6 De Paul L Rev 281, Spring-Summer '57

Wire tapping by extension telephone [Rathbun v. U.S., 236 F 2d 514] 35 Tex L Rev 856, Je '57

Tapping telephone and opening letters. 1957 Crim L Rev 502, Ag

'57

Wire tapping: an examination of United States experience. G. W. Davey 107 L J 564, S 6 '57

Wiretap evidence obtained by local authorities admissible in federal prosecution [U.S. v. Benanti, 244 F 2d 389] 43 Ba L Rev 944 O '57

« ZurückWeiter »