Rationality and the Genetic Challenge: Making People Better?

Capa
Cambridge University Press, 11 de fev. de 2010
Should we make people healthier, smarter, and longer-lived if genetic and medical advances enable us to do so? Matti Häyry asks this question in the context of genetic testing and selection, cloning and stem cell research, gene therapies and enhancements. The ethical questions explored include parental responsibility, the use of people as means, the role of hope and fear in risk assessment, and the dignity and meaning of life. Taking as a starting point the arguments presented by Jonathan Glover, John Harris, Ronald M. Green, Jürgen Habermas, Michael J. Sandel, and Leon R. Kass, who defend a particular normative view as the only rational or moral answer, Matti Häyry argues that many coherent rationalities and moralities exist in the field, and that to claim otherwise is mistaken.
 

Conteúdo

1 Seven ways of making people better
1
2 Rational approaches to the genetic challenge
24
3 The best babies and parental responsibility
52
4 Deaf embryos morality and the law
78
5 Saviour siblings and treating people as a means
99
6 Reproductive cloning and designing human beings
124
7 Embryonic stem cells vulnerability and sanctity
146
8 Gene therapies hopes and fears
174
9 Considerable life extension and the meaning of life
195
10 Taking the genetic challenge rationally
220
Bibliography
241
Index
261
Direitos autorais

Outras edições - Ver todos

Termos e frases comuns

Sobre o autor (2010)

Matti Häyry is Professor of Bioethics and Philosophy of Law at the University of Manchester and Professorial Fellow at the University of Helsinki Collegium for Advanced Studies, Finland.

Informações bibliográficas