...the facts which illustrate that point will alone be mentioned. This is a writ of right, originally brought by the plaintiff in error, against the defendant in error, to recover a certain tract of land in Kentucky, described in the writ. Issue being joined on the mere right between...

...the facts which illustrate that point will alone be mentioned. This is a writ of right, originally brought by the plaintiff in error, against the defendant in error, to recover a certain tract of land in Kentucky, described in the writ. Issue being joined on the mere right between...

...Omen for the defendant. Mr. Justice TRIMBLE delivered the opinion of the Court. March nth, This was an action of ejectment brought by the plaintiff in error against the defendant, in the District Court of the United States for the district of Alabama. The plaintiff excrpted to certain...

...the opinion. DA VASON, for plaintiff in error. D. H, POPE, for defendant. HAWKINS, Justice. This was an action of ejectment brought by the plaintiff in error against the defendant, to recover a house and lot in the city of Albany. The muniment of title relied upon by the plaintiff...

...for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, to bring up for review certain instructions to the jury in an action of ejectment brought by the plaintiff in error against the defendants in error, and in which Uie latter obtained the verdict. Frederick White was the owner of...

...Houston Superior Court. Tried before Judge STARK, April Term, 1850. . t Sorrell vs. Ham nnd Ham. This was an action of ejectment, brought by the plaintiff in error against the defendant, under the Act of 1847, for the recovery of a tract of land lying in Houston County, and mesne profits....

...Ejectment, from Gordon Superior Court. Tried before Judge JOHN H. LUMPKIN, May Term, 1851. This was an action of ejectment, brought by the plaintiff in error against the defendants. On the trial, plaintiff offered in evidence, his letters of administration, granting him...

...reaffirmed the above case, and the opinion of the Court was delivered bj Chief Justice Taney as follows : " This is an action of ejectment, brought by the plaintiff in error to recover a lot of ground in the town of Mobile, in the State of Alabama. He claimed title under an...

...reaffirmed the above case, and the opinion of the Court was delivered by Chief Justice Taney as follows : "This is an action of ejectment, brought by the' plaintiff in error to recover a lot of ground in the town of Mobile, in the State of Alabama. He claimed title under an...

...Waddell's Lessee, 16 Peters, 369. Den v. Jersey Company. Mr. Chief Justice TANEY delivered the opinion of the court. This is an action of ejectment brought by the plaintiff in error against the defendants in the Circuit Court for the district of New Jersey, to recover a parcel of land situate...