Democracy as Public DeliberationMaurizio Passerin d'Entrèves Transaction Publishers - 228 Seiten One of the most remarkable developments in the last twenty years has been the revival of the idea of deliberative democracy. Set against models of democracy derived from economics, such as the theory of rational choice, the idea of decision-making based on public deliberations among free and equal citizens, represents a highly significant development in democratic theory. This book explores this development, providing a fresh and original perspective on a theme at the center of current debates in democratic theory and practice. Such debates have originated in response to growing demands for fair treatment by groups claiming recognition of their collective identity. |
Im Buch
Ergebnisse 1-5 von 76
Seite 2
... participation possible? In societies as culturally diverse as our own, is it reasonable to expect deliberating citizens to converge on rational solutions to political problems? Does deliberation actually overcome or only exacerbate the ...
... participation possible? In societies as culturally diverse as our own, is it reasonable to expect deliberating citizens to converge on rational solutions to political problems? Does deliberation actually overcome or only exacerbate the ...
Seite 7
... participants. To this end Cohen sketches an ideal deliberative procedure that captures the notion of justification through public argument among equal citizens, and serves in turn as a model for deliberative institutions. The relevance ...
... participants. To this end Cohen sketches an ideal deliberative procedure that captures the notion of justification through public argument among equal citizens, and serves in turn as a model for deliberative institutions. The relevance ...
Seite 8
... participation and non-tyranny, a collective process of deliberation occurs in which the group has a reasonable ... participation in public affairs as good in itself, and both believe that political participation improves the moral and ...
... participation and non-tyranny, a collective process of deliberation occurs in which the group has a reasonable ... participation in public affairs as good in itself, and both believe that political participation improves the moral and ...
Seite 9
... participation - that produces beneficial educative effects on individuals? If the argument in favour of deliberation is to work it has to show that public deliberation produces beneficial educative effects that are superior to the ...
... participation - that produces beneficial educative effects on individuals? If the argument in favour of deliberation is to work it has to show that public deliberation produces beneficial educative effects that are superior to the ...
Seite 12
... participants, that is, obligations which they owe to one another but not to those outside the deliberative process. These include the obligation to provide reasons that all can accept, to listen and respond to the reasons and arguments ...
... participants, that is, obligations which they owe to one another but not to those outside the deliberative process. These include the obligation to provide reasons that all can accept, to listen and respond to the reasons and arguments ...
Inhalt
MAURIZIO PASSERIN DENTREVES | 39 |
MAEVE COOKE | 53 |
MATTHEW FESTENSTEIN | 88 |
MICHAEL SAWARD | 112 |
JUDITH SQUIRES | 133 |
GRAHAM SMITH AND CORINNE WALES | 157 |
DAVID MILLER | 201 |
Index | 227 |
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
Democracy as Public Deliberation: New Perspectives Maurizio Passerin d'Entrèves Eingeschränkte Leseprobe - 2002 |
Häufige Begriffe und Wortgruppen
able accept actual agreement appears argues argument authority autonomy basis Benhabib Cambridge chapter citizens citizenship claims Cohen collective conception concerned constitutional context critical cultural debate decision defend deliberative democracy democratic democratic legitimacy dialogue discussion effect engage epistemic equal example expression fact fair formal give given grounds groups Habermas idea ideal identity impartiality important inclusive individual institutions interests Ireland issues juries justice laws legitimate liberal matter means ment minority moral normative obligations offer opinion original outcomes Oxford participants particular perspectives pluralism political position possible practical preferences present principles problems procedure proposal public deliberation public reason public spheres question rational Rawls Rawls's reached reflect relation representative requires respect seen sense social society standards status suggest theory tion tive University Press validity voting Young