Beck Rights 2001: Are Workers Being Heard? : Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Workforce Protections of the Committee on Education and the Workforce, House of Representatives, One Hundred Seventh Congress, First Session, Hearing Held in Washington, DC, May 10, 2001, Band 4U.S. Government Printing Office, 2002 - 345 Seiten |
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
Häufige Begriffe und Wortgruppen
affiliates AFL-CIO agency fee alleged Andrews arbitration bargaining unit Beck decision Beck notice Beck objectors Beck rights Board Member calculation California Saw Chairman Norwood challenge chargeable Charging Parties CHARLIE NORWOOD collective bargaining agreement Committee Communications Workers complaint contract Corson Counsel Craig Sickler discharge dues and fees duty of fair Dyncorp employment escrow escrow account expenditures expenses fair representation federal fee objectors Fields-Jacobs filed financial core payors hearing Hudson INTERNATIONAL UNION issue Labor Relations Act Labor Relations Board LaJeunesse Legal Defense Foundation Machinists union National Labor Relations National Right NLRB nonchargeable nonmembers nonrepresentational activities object organizing payment Penrod percent percentage Plaintiffs procedures Railway Labor Act reduction Regional Director represented request Respondent Unions S.Ct Schedule September 24 Subcommittee Supreme Court U.S. Airways U.S. Govt unfair labor practice union dues union members union membership union security United Airlines Upper Marlboro violated vote Workforce
Beliebte Passagen
Seite 152 - No objection that has not been urged before the Board, its member, agent, or agency, shall be considered by the court, unless the failure or neglect to urge such objection shall be excused because of extraordinary circumstances.
Seite 218 - ... to compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves, is sinful and tyrannical...
Seite 148 - ... to serve the interests of all members without hostility or discrimination toward any, to exercise its discretion with complete good faith and honesty, and to avoid arbitrary conduct.
Seite 294 - ... for any reason other than the failure of the employee to tender the periodic dues, initiation fees, and assessments (not including fines and penalties) uniformly required as a condition of acquiring or retaining membership.
Seite 29 - It may be that courts and lawyers with sufficient skill in accounting, algebra, geometry, trigonometry and calculus will be able to extract the proper microscopic answer from the voluminous and complex accounting records of the local, national, and international unions involved. It seems to me ... however, that... this formula with its attendant trial burdens promises little hope for financial recompense to the individual workers whose First Amendment freedoms have been flagrantly violated.
Seite 88 - Mr. Chairman, my name is Owen Bieber. I am President of the International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (UAW). I am pleased to be here today representing 1.4 million active and retired UAW members in support of S.
Seite 137 - Respondent is engaged in commerce within the meaning of Section 2(6) and (7) of the Act.
Seite 330 - Employer constitute a unit appropriate for the purposes of collective bargaining within the meaning of Section 9 (b) of the Act...
Seite 333 - In any like or related manner interfering with, restraining, or coercing employees in the exercise of the rights guaranteed them by Section 7 of the Act.
Seite 23 - Robertson and seven other electricians be given the back pay they would have earned if they had been treated fairly. The NLRB later reversed part of its decision, but Paul Robertson did not give up. With the help of the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, he appealed the Board's decision to the US Court of Appeals, arguing that hiring hall favoritism is discriminatory and unlawful. Paul Robertson was fortunate. He found experienced legal help) — all important because the case dragged...