Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court: And in the Court for the Trial of Impeachments and the Correction of Errors, of the State of New York, Volume 2
William Gould, 1845
O que estão dizendo - Escrever uma resenha
Não encontramos nenhuma resenha nos lugares comuns.
Outras edições - Visualizar todos
Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court: And ..., Volume 4
Visualização completa - 1836
Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court and in ..., Volume 3
Visualização completa - 1835
action admitted affidavit agreement ALBANY allowed amount answer appear appellant applied assignment attorney authority Bank bill bond cause cent Chancellor charge cited claim common consideration considered contract costs counsel Court debt decided decision deed defendant denied devise discount dollars effect entered entitled equity error evidence execution executor fact fraud give given granted ground Insurance intention interest issue Jackson John Judge judgment jury Justice land limitation matter means ment mortgage motion necessary never notice object opinion paid party passed payment person plaintiff plea possession premises present principle proceedings proved purchase question reason received record relation respondent rule says Sheriff statute suit Suppose taken term thing tion trial usury void Wattles whole witness Wolf YORK
Página 25 - To them his heart, his love, his griefs were given, But all his serious thoughts had rest in heaven. As some tall cliff that lifts its awful form, Swells from the vale, and midway leaves the storm, — Though round its breast the rolling clouds are spread, Eternal sunshine settles on its head.
Página 284 - Before we conclude the doctrine of remainders and reversions, it may be proper to observe, that f whenever a greater estate and a less coincide and meet in one and the same person, without any intermediate estate/ the less is immediately annihilated;! or, in the law phrase, is said to be 'merged, that is, sunk or drowned, in the greater.
Página 59 - Through every stage of the conflict, the United States have maintained an impartial neutrality, giving aid to neither of the parties in men, money, ships, or munitions of war. They have regarded the contest not in the light of an ordinary insurrection or rebellion, but as a civil war between parties nearly equal, having, as to neutral powers, equal rights.
Página 303 - Upon this subject a Court of equity is not guided by the rules of law. It will sometimes hold a charge extinguished where it would subsist at law, and sometimes preserve it where at law it would be merged. 3 The question is upon the intention, actual or presumed, of the person in whom the interests are united.
Página 2 - Co. of the said district, have deposited in this office the title of a book, the right whereof they claim as proprietors, in the words following, to wit : " Tadeuskund, the Last King of the Lenape. An Historical Tale." In conformity to the Act of the Congress of the United States...
Página 814 - No person shall be held to answer for a capital or otherwise infamous crime (except in cases of impeachment, and in cases of militia when in actual service; and the land and naval forces in time of war, or which this State may keep with the consent of Congress in time of peace, and in cases of petit larceny, under the regulation of the Legislature), unless on presentment or indictment of a grand jury...
Página 556 - But no acknowledgment of any conveyance having been executed, shall be taken by any officer, unless the officer taking the same shall know, or have satisfactory evidence, that the person making such acknowledgment is the individual described in and who executed such conveyance.
Página 649 - Whenever parties can, by their own act, transfer real property, or exercise any act of ownership with regard to it, they may refer any disputes concerning it to the decision of arbitrators, who may order the same acts to be done which the parties themselves might do by agreement.
Página 73 - The reason of the rule, which obliges the parties to disclose, is to prevent fraud, and encourage good faith, it is adapted to such facts as vary the nature of the contract, which one privately knows, and the other is ignorant of, and has no reason to suspect. The question, therefore...