Civil Rights Commission: Hearings, Eighty-eighth Congress, First Session, on S. 1117 and S. 1219, May 21-23, June 5-6 and 12, 1963
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1963 - 467 páginas
O que estão dizendo - Escrever uma resenha
Não encontramos nenhuma resenha nos lugares comuns.
Outras edições - Visualizar todos
action administration agency amendment American areas assistance Attorney authority basis believe bill Board Chairman cities citizens Civil Rights Commission colored Commission on Civil Commission's Committee concerned Congress Constitution continue COOKE course Court CREECH denied Department discrimination District Division effect employment enforcement equal established executive existence extended fact Federal Government feel field functions funds give given going grants groups hearings housing important individual institutions issue Justice legislation loan matter ment Michigan Mississippi necessary Negro officers operation opinion opportunity permanent person practices present President problems proceedings programs proposal protection question race racial reason recommendation relations respect responsibility rules segregation Senator ERVIN serve South Stat statement statute subcommittee thing tion United violation vote witnesses
Página 433 - We conclude that in the field of public education the doctrine of "separate but equal" has no place. Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal.
Página 431 - We must consider public education in the light of its full development and its present place in American life throughout the Nation. Only in this way can it be determined if segregation in public schools deprives these plaintiffs of the equal protection of the laws. Today, education is perhaps the most important function of state and local governments.
Página 449 - The words of the amendment, it is true, are prohibitory, but they contain a necessary implication of a positive immunity, or right, most valuable to the colored race, — the right to exemption from unfriendly legislation against them distinctively as colored,— exemption from legal discriminations, implying inferiority in civil society, lessening the security of their enjoyment of the rights which others enjoy, and discriminations which are steps towards reducing them to the condition of a subject...
Página 433 - Because these are class actions, because of the wide applicability of this decision, and because of the great variety of local conditions, the formulation of decrees in these cases presents problems of considerable complexity.
Página 208 - If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any citizen in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same, or if two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another...
Página 430 - ... separate but equal" doctrine in the field of public education. In Gumming v. County Board of Education, 175 US 528, and Gong Lum v. Rice, 275 US 78, the validity of the doctrine itself was not challenged. In more recent cases, all on the graduate school level, inequality was found in that specific benefits enjoyed by white students were denied to Negro students of the same educational qualifications.
Página 122 - Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects, or causes to be subjected, any inhabitant of any State, Territory, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution and laws of the United States...
Página 421 - In these days, it is doubtful that any child may reasonably be expected to succeed in life if he is denied the opportunity of an education. Such an opportunity, where the state has undertaken to provide it, is a right which must be made available to all on equal terms. We come then to the question presented: Does segregation of children in public schools solely on the basis of race, even though the physical facilities and other "tangible" factors may be equal, deprive the children of the minority...