Imagens da página
PDF
ePub

Church; and all of them adhering to the main trunk or centre of union-the Apostolic See. Some of the General Councils or Synods likewise appear, in which the Bishops from different parts of the Church assembled from time to time, under the authority of the Pope, to define its doctrine and regulate its discipline. The size of the sheet was insufficient to exhibit all the various Councils. Again you behold in this tree the continuation of the apostolic work, the conversion of nations, which, as it was committed by Christ to the Catholic Church, so it has never been blessed by him with success in any hands but in hers. This exclusive miracle, in the order of nature, which I treated of in a former letter, is itself a Divine Attestation in her behalf. Speaking of the conversion of nations, I must not fail, dear Sir, to remind your Society, that this our country has twice been reclaimed from Paganism, and each time by the apostolic labour of Missionaries, sent hither by the See of Rome. The first conversion took place in the second century, when Pope Eleutherius sent Fugatius and Duvianus for this purpose, to the Ancient Britons or Welch, under their king or governor, Lucius, as Bede and other historians relate. The second conversion was that of our immediate ancestors, the English Saxons and Angles, by St. Augustin and his companions, at the end of the sixth century, who were sent from Rome on this apostolical errand by Pope Gregory the Great. Lastly, you see in the present sketch, a series of unhappy children of the Church, who, instead of hearing her doctrines, as it was their duty to do, have pretended to reform them; and thus, losing the vital influx of their parent stock, have withered and fallen off from it as dead branches.

[blocks in formation]

294

LETTER XXIX.

To JAMES BROWN, Esq. &c.

ON THE APOSTOLICITY OF THE CATHOLIC MINISTRY.

DEAR SIR,

IN viewing The Apostolical Tree, you are to consider it as representing an uninterrupted succession of Pontiffs and Prelates, who derive, not barely their Doctrine, but also, and in a special manner, their Ministry, namely, their Holy Or ders, and the Right or Jurisdiction to exercise those Orders, in a right line from the Apostles of Jesus Christ. In fact, the Catholic Church, in all past ages, has not been more jealous of the sacred deposit of Orthodox Doctrine, than of the equally sacred deposits of Legitimate Ordination, by Bishops who themselves had been rightly ordained and consecrated, and of Valid Jurisdiction or Divine Mission, by which she authorises her ministers to exercise their respective functions in such and such places, with respect to such and such persons, and under such and such conditions as she, by the depositaries of this jurisdiction, is pleased to ordain. Thus, my dear Sir, every Catholic Pastor is authorized and enabled to address his flock as follows: The word of God which I announce to you, and the Holy Sacraments which I dispense to you, I am QUALIFIED to announce and dispense by such a Catholic Bishop, who was consecrated by such another Catholic Bishop, and so on, in a series, which reaches to the Apostles themselves and I am AUTHORIZED to preach and minister to you by such a Prelate, who received authority for this purpose from the Successor of St. Peter, in the Apostolic See of Rome. Heretofore, during a considerable time, the learned and conscientious divines of the Church of England held

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

the same principles, on both these points, that Catholics have ever held, and were no less firm in maintaining the Divine Right of Episcopacy and the Ministry than we are. This appears from the works of one who was, perhaps, the most profound and accurate amongst them, the celebrated Hooker. He proves, at great length, that the ecclesiastical ministry is a Divine function, instituted by God, and deriving its authority from God, in a very different manner from that of 'Princes and Magistrates:' that it is 'a wretched 'blindness not to admire so great a power as that 'which the clergy are endowed with, or to sup6 pose that any but God can bestow it:' that it 'consists in a power over the mystical body of Christ, by the remission of sins, and over his natural body in the Sacrament, which antiquity doth call the making of Christ's body.' (1) He distinguishes between the power of Orders, and the authority of Mission or Jurisdiction, on both which points he is supported by the canons and laws of the establishment. Not to speak of prior laws, the Act of Uniformity (2) provides, that no minister shall hold any living, or officiate in any Church, who has not received Episcopal Ordination. It also requires that he shall be approved and licensed for his particular place and function. This is also clear from the form of Induction of a clerk into any cure. (3) In virtue of this system, when Episcopacy was re-established in Scotland, in the year 1662, four Presbyterian Ministers having been appointed by the King to that office, the English Bishops refused to consecrate them, unless they consented to be previously ordained Deacons and Priests; thus renouncing their former ministerial character, and acknowledging

(1) Ecclesiastic. Politic, B. v. Art. 77. (2) Stat. 13 and 14 Car. II. c. 4.

(3) Curam et regimen animarum parochianorum tibi committimus.'

that they had hitherto been mere laymen. (1) In like manner, on the accession of King Wil liam, who was a Dutch Calvinist, to the throne, when a commission of ten Bishops and twenty Divines was appointed to modify the Articles and Liturgy of the Established Church, for the purpose of forming a coalition with the Dissenters, it appeared that the most lax among them, such as Tillotson and Burnet, together with Chief Baron Hales and other lay Lords, required that the Dissenting Ministers should, at least, be conditionally ordained, (2) as being thus far, mere laymen. In a word, it is well known to be the practice of the Established Church, at the present day, to ordain all Dissenting Protestant Ministers of every description, who go over to her; whereas, she never attempts to re-ordain an Apostate Catholic Priest who offers himself to her service, but is satisfied with his taking the oaths prescribed by law. (3) This doctrine of the establishment evidently unchurches, as Dr. Heylin expresses it, all other Protestant communions, as it is an established principle, that no ministry, no church, (4) and with equal evidence, it unchristians them also; since this Church unanimously resolved, in 1575, that Baptism cannot be performed by any person but a lawful minister. (5)

(1) Collier's Eccl. Hist. vol. ii. p. 837. It appears from the same History that four other Scotch Ministers, who had formerly permitted themselves to be consecrated Bishops, were, on that account, excom. municated and degraded by the Kirk. Records, N. cxiii. (2) Life of Tillotson, by Dr. Birch, pp. 42, 176.

(3) Notwithstanding these proofs of the doctrine and practice of the Established Church, a great proportion of her modern divines consent, at the present day, to sacrifice all her pretensions to divine authority and uninterrupted succession. It has been shown in The Letters to a Prebendary, that in the principles of the celebrated Dr. Balguy, a Priest or a Bishop can as well be made by the Town Crier, if commissioned by the Civil power, as by the Metropolitan. To this system, Dr. Sturges, Dr. Hey, Dr. Paley, Dr. Tomline, and a crowd of other learned theologians subscribe their names. Even the Bishop of Lincoln, in maintaining Episcopacy to be an apostolical institution, denies it to be binding on Christians to adopt it: which, in fact, is to reduce it to a mere civil and optional practice. Elem. vol. ii. Art. 23.

(4) Ubi nullus est Sacerdos nulla est Ecclesia.' St. Jerom, &c. 15) Elem. of Theol. vol. ii. p. 471.

[ocr errors]

But dismissing these uncertain and wavering opinions, we know what little account all other Protestants, except those of England, have made of Apostolical Succession, and Episcopal Ordination. Luther's principles on these points are clear from his famous Bull against the FALSELY CALLED Order of Bishops, (1) where he says, Give ear now, you Bishops, or rather you visors of the Devil: Doctor Luther will read you a bull and a Reform, which will not sound sweet in your ears. Dr. Luther's Bull and Reform is this: whoever spend their labour, persons and fortunes, to lay waste your episcopacies, and to extinguish the government of Bishops, they are the beloved of God, true Christians, and oppoC sers of the Devil's ordinances. On the other hand, whoever support the government of Bishops, and willingly obey them, they are the 'Devil's ministers', &c.-True it is, that afterwards, namely in 1542, this Arch-Reformer, to gratify his chief Patron, the Elector of Saxony, took upon himself to consecrate his bottle-companion, Amsdorf, Bishop of Naumburgh: (2) but then it is notorious, from the whole of his conduct, that Luther set himself above all law, and derided all consistency and decency. Nearly the same may be said of another late Reformer, John Wesley, who, professing himself to be a Presbyter of the Church of England, pretended to ordain Messrs. Whatcoat, Vesey, &c. Priests, and to consecrate Dr. Coke a Bishop! (3) With equal inconsistency the Elders of Hernhuth, in Moravia, profess to consecrate Bishops for England and other kingdoms. On the other hand, how. averse the Calvinists and other dissenters are to

(1) Adversus falso Normin. Tom. ii. Jen. A. D. 1825.

(2) Sleidan, Comment. L. 14.

(3) Dr. Whitehead's Life of Charles and John Wesley. It appears that Charles was horribly scandalized at this step of his brother John, and that a lasting schism among the Wesleyan Methodists was the con sequence of it.

« AnteriorContinuar »