several propositions which had been made, were committed to Mr. WILSON, Mr. GORHAM, Mr. RUTLEDGE, Mr. CLARK, and Mr. HAMILTON.

THURSDAY, MARCH 20TH.

An instruction from the Legislature of Virginia to their Delegates, against admitting into the Treaty of Peace any stipulation for restoring confiscated property, was laid before Congress.

Also resolutions of the Executive Council of Pennsylvania, requesting the Delegates of that State to endeavour to obtain at least a reasonable term for making the payment of British debts stipulated in the preliminary articles lately received.

These papers were committed to Mr. OSGOOD, Mr. MERCER, and Mr. FITZSIMMONS.

Mr. DYER, whose vote on the tenth day of March frustrated the commutation of the half-pay, made a proposition substantially the same, which was committed. This seemed to be extorted from him by the critical state of our affairs, himself personally, and his State, being opposed to it.

The motion of Mr. HAMILTON, on the Journals, was meant as a testimony on his part of the insufficiency of the Report of the Committee as to the establishment of revenues, and as a final trial of the sense of Congress with respect to the practicability and necessity of a general revenue equal to the public wants. The debates on it were chiefly a repetition of those used on former questions relative to that subject.

Mr. FITZSIMMONS, on this occasion, declared that, on mature reflection, he was convinced that a complete general revenue was unattainable from the States, was impracticable in the hands of Congress, and that the modified provision reported by the Committee, if established by the States, would restore public credit among ourselves. He apprehended, however, that no limited funds would procure loans abroad, which would require funds commensurate to their duration.

Mr. HIGGINSON described all attempts of Congress to provide for the public debts out of the mode prescribed by the Confederation as nugatory; that the States would disregard them; that the impost of five per cent. had passed in Massachusetts by two voices only in the lower, and one in the upper, house; and that the Governor had never formally assented to the law; that it was probable this law would be repealed, and almost certain that the extensive plans of Congress would be reprobated.

FRIDAY, MARCH 21ST.

The Report on revenue was taken into consideration, and the fifth and sixth paragraphs, after discussion, being judged not sufficiently explicit, were recommitted to be made more so.

A motion was made by Mr. CLARK, seconded by Mr. BLAND, to complete so much of the Report as related to an impost on trade, and send it to the States immediately, apart from the residue.

In support of this motion it was urged that the impost was distinct in its nature, was more likely to be adopted, and ought not, therefore, to be delayed or hazarded by a connection with the other parts of the Report. On the other side it was contended, that it was the duty of Congress to provide a system adequate to the public exigencies; and that such a system would be more likely to be adopted by the States than any partial or detached provision, as it would comprise objects agreeable, as well as disagreeable, to each of the States, and as all of them would feel a greater readiness to make mutual concessions, and to disregard local considerations, in proportion to the magnitude of the object held out to them.

The motion was disagreed to, New Jersey being in favor of it, and several other States divided.

SATURDAY, MARCH 22ND.

A letter was received from General Washington, enclosing his address to the convention of officers, with the result of their consultations. The dissipation of the cloud which seemed to have been gathering afforded great pleasure, on the whole, to Congress; but it was observable that the part which the General had found it necessary, and thought it his duty, to take, would give birth to events much more serious, if they should not be obviated by the establishment of such funds as the General, as well as the army, had declared to be necessary.

58

The Report of the Committee on Mr. DYER'S motion, in favor of a commutation for the half-pay, was agreed to. The preamble was objected to, but admitted at the entreaty of Mr. DYER, who supposed the considerations recited in it would tend to reconcile the State of Connecticut to the measure.

An order passed for granting thirty-five licenses for vessels belonging to Nantucket, to secure the whaling vessels against the penalty for double papers. This order was, in consequence of a deputation to Congress representing the exposed situation of that Island, the importance of the whale fishery to the United States, the danger of its being usurped by other nations, and the concurrence of the enemy in neutralizing such a number of vessels as would carry on the fisheries to an extent necessary for the support of the inhabitants.

The Committee, to whom was referred the letter from the Secretary of Foreign Affairs, with the foreign despatches, &c., reported—

1. That our Ministers be thanked for their zeal and services in negotiating the preliminary articles.

2. That they be instructed to make a communication of the separate article to the Court of France, in such way as would best get over the concealment.

3. That the Secretary of Foreign Affairs inform them that it is the wish of Congress that preliminary articles had been communicated to the Court of France before they had been executed.

Mr. DYER said he was opposed to the whole report; that he fully approved of every step taken by our Ministers, as well towards Great Britain as towards France; that the separate article did not

concern the interests of France, and therefore could not involve the good faith of the United States.

Mr. LEE agreed fully with Mr. DYER; said that the special report of facts ought to have been made necessary for enabling Congress to form a just opinion of the conduct of the Ministers; and moved, that the report might be recommitted. Mr. WOLCOTT seconded the motion, which was evidently made for the sole purpose of delay. It was opposed by Mr. CLARK, Mr. WILSON and Mr. GORHAM, the first and last of whom had, however, no objection to postponing; by Mr. MERCER, who repeated his abhorrence of the confidence shown by our Ministers to those of Great Britain; said, that it was about to realize the case of those who kicked down the ladder by which they had been elevated, and of the viper which was ready to destroy the family of the man in whose bosom it had been restored to life. He observed, that it was unwise to prefer Great Britain to Spain as our neighbours in West Florida.

Mr. HIGGINSON supported the sentiments of Mr. LEE; said that the Count de Vergennes had released our Ministers; and that he agreed with those who thought the instruction of June the fifteenth could relate only to questions directly between Great Britain and the United States.

Mr. HOLTEN thought there was no sufficient evidence for praise or blame; and that both ought to be suspended until the true reasons should be stated by the Ministers. He supposed that the separate article had been made an ultimatum of the preliminaries of Great Britain; and that there might also be secret articles between Great Britain and France.