Imagens da página
PDF
ePub
[merged small][ocr errors][merged small]

move, as far as in their power, the assessed taxes.

Lord George Bentinek thought that the Chancellor of the Exchequer had made a great omission in not stating what amount he anticipated from the reduced corn duties. In his glowing speech too little credit had been given for the bounties of the harvests.

Mr. Charles Wood expressed his approval of the commercial policy of the Government.

Mr. Hudson saw no ground for such a congratulatory speech as Mr. Goulburn's. He thought that a speculative Ministry, as the present had been called, would have dashed at tea, and reduced the duty on that article. The whole statement of the Chancellor of the Exchequer was a laudation of the Government measures; so that the right honourable gentleman might be called, like a former holder of his office, "Prosperity Goulburn."

The usual resolution was then agreed to.

CHAPTER V.

Ireland-Prevalence of Assassination and Outrages in that countryLord St. Germans introduces a Bill in the House of Lords for the Protection of Life in Ireland-His Speech on moving the second reading-Speeches of the Marquis of Lansdowne, Lord Brougham, the Marquis of Clanricarde and other Peers-The Bill is read a second time, and amended in Committee-It is introduced in the House of Commons by Sir James Graham on the 30th of MarchIt is vigorously opposed on the Motion for the first reading-Speeches of Sir W. Somerville, Mr. Smith O'Brien, Mr. Shaw, Mr. O'Connell, and Lord George Bentinck-Sir James Graham states the nature and objects of the Measure-The Debate is prolonged by the opposition of Irish and other Members, and is repeatedly adjourned-Speeches of various Members for and against the Bill-A Division at length takes place, and the Bill is read a first time by 274 to 125-The contest is renewed on the Motion for the second reading, which is moved on the 9th of June-Reasons of the delay-The discussion is continued by numerous Adjournments, from the 9th to the 25th of June-Selections from various Speeches-Sir W. Somerville moves an Amendment that the Bill be read a second time that day six months-Mr. Bernal seconds the Amendment-Speeches of the Earl of Lincoln, Mr. M. J. O'Connell, Lord George Bentinck, Mr. Sidney Herbert, Mr. Hawes, Lord F. Egerton, Mr. Colquhoun, Lord John Russell, Mr. Disraeli, Mr. Roebuck, Lord J. Manners, Sir James Graham, Mr. Labouchere, Mr. Stafford O'Brien, Lord Newport, Mr. Hume, Mr. Shiel, the Solicitor-General, the Marquis of Chandos, Mr. Newdegate and Mr. Cobden-On a Division, 292 vote against the second reading and 219 for it-Coincidence of the defeat of Ministers, and the passing of the Corn Bill in the House of Lords-News arrives from America of the Settlement of the Oregon Question-Resignation of Sir Robert Peel's Cabinet-The announcement is made by the Duke of Wellington in the House of Lords on the 29th of June-Lord Brougham adverts to the Oregon Question-Statement of the Earl of Aberdeen-On the same evening Sir Robert Peel declares his Resignation of Office in the House of Commons-His Speech on that occasion-Remarks of Lord Palmerston and Mr. Hume.

T

HE unusual prevalence of assassinations and crimes of violence in Ireland during the

early part of this year induced Sir Robert Peel's Government to introduce a measure of a coercive

character for the prevention of such outrages, somewhat similar in character to measures that had in former years been enacted, under both Whig and Conservative Governments, for a like object. The initiation of the present Bill took place in the House of Lords, the second reading being moved by the Earl of St. Germans, on the 24th of February. The noble lord commenced his speech on this occasion by remarking that nothing but necessity could justify the Government in proposing such a measure or the House in adopting it. It would be his duty to make out his case by producing documentary evidence of the state of Ireland, as he had no right to take for granted that their lordships were possessed of any knowledge on the subject. From the returns in the possession of the Government it appeared that in 1844 there were in Ireland 144 homicides in the last year only 136; offences of firing houses in 1844, 104-in 1845, 138; aggravated assaults in 1844, 504-in the present year, 544; common assaults last year, 251-the present year, 242. Passing over of fences against property, which are comparatively rare in Ireland, he would refer to offences against the public peace. Last year there

were robberies of arms, 159-in the present year, 551; appearing in arms last year, 79-in the present year, 89; administering unlawful oaths last year, 59in the present year, 223; sending threatening letters or notices last year, 662-which had increased to the fearful extent of 1,944 in the present year; houses attacked, 254 last year-in the present year, 483; firing into dwellinghouses last year, 77-the present

year, 138. The total amount of these crimes was last year, 1,495 -which has risen to 3,462 in the present year. The grand total of offences against the person, property, and the public peace, was last year, 3,102--in the present year, 5,281. One consolatory circumstance might be mentioned: in eighteen counties in Ireland crime has diminished in the last two years, in four counties it had been stationary, and it was only in ten that it had increased. These are-Cavan, Fermanagh, King's County, Longford, Westmeath, Clare, Roscommon, Limerick, Tipperary, and Leitrim. In addition to such official returns, Lord St. Germans read a number of statements, and detailed reports of the more remarkable homicides and outrages that had occurred, the authorities being justices of the peace and other trustworthy persons. In connection with these details he remarked, that of the many outrages which had occurred-137 homicides and many aggravated assaults-the House would be surprised to learn that there were only five which had been committed on the persons of gentlemen. The dwellings of the upper ranks were comparatively safe, as the inmates were armed and could defend themselves; but the position of the small farmer or cottier was different. If he complies with a threatening notice and leaves his small holding, he becomes an outcast and a wanderer ; and if regard for his family induces him to brave the danger and remain, what is the consequence? In the dead of the night his door, which cannot resist the smallest pressure, is forced open; a band of armed and disguised ruffians

break in; they drag him from his bed, and either murder or maim and mutilate him in presence of his wife and children.

Lord St. Germans was prepared to show that the Government had put in force the existing law so far as was practicable. In the disturbed districts the constabulary had been increased. In Cavan county, in 1836, there were only 179 policemen, but now 400; and in other counties large augmentations had taken place. This increase was independent of military parties. There had also been an increase in the number of stipendiary magistrates, but he regretted to say that all had proved ineffectual.

An outline of the proposed measure was next submitted. It provided for the proclaiming a district in which murders or attempts to murder had been committed, and enabled the lord-lieutenant to station in that locality an additional force of constabulary, the expense to be wholly borne by the district. There was also a provision of great importance, founded on the fact that many of the murders were concocted in public-houses at night, and executed during darkness. To meet this, a power was to be conferred on the Executive Government of forbidding persons to be out of their dwellings between sunset and sunrise. The Bill enabled the lord-lieutenant to award to a person maimed, or to the representatives of a person murdered, a reasonable compensation," though, perhaps, it could hardly be called compensation." [Lord Campbell sug[Lord Campbell suggested the word Solatium."] The power of withdrawing the proclamation was to be conferred also on the lord-lieutenant. Offences against the Act were to be treated

66

as misdemeanours. But he would not go into all the details now, as ample opportunities would be subsequently presented.

As to the cause of crime, he could not coincide in the opinion that it arose from defective political institutions. He had shown that crime had actually diminished in many counties where the political circumstances were the same as those which existed in the disturbed districts. Neither were the outrages directed against the existing authorities, but were universally perpetrated on individuals who had incurred on private grounds the vengeance of the perpetrators. It was true that many of the outrages partook of an agrarian character, but he was bound to say that the great cause of the evils which prevailed in Ireland was to be found in the existence of secret and illegal associations. It was necessary to meet the existing evil; and when the object was attained, and a feeling of "security" extended to every peasant in Ireland, then the country might look forward forward to satisfactory results from the measures on which the Government were at that moment engaged, and those which Parliament had already adopted.

The Marquis of Lansdowne could not think of offering the least opposition to a Bill so imperatively called for as the present; but hoped the Government would not think itself relieved from the necessity of bringing forward other measures for the amelioration of Ireland, which would be calculated to give more universal satisfaction in that country.

Lord Brougham thought the Bill ought to be passed with the least possible delay, but regretted that

it did not contain one provision, which he had before advocated, to the effect that trials should not take place in a part of the country where the jurors would be exposed to the shot of the assassin.

Lord Farnham gave a sketch of the disturbances in Cavan, which, from being the most peaceful country in Ireland, had become in fourteen months the seat of desparate outrages. The origin of these crimes might be traced to the Riband Societies- associations of the most dangerous description. The noble lord concluded by giving his most cordial support to the proposed measure.

The Marquis of Clanricarde defended himself against the attacks of a portion of the Irish press, which had assailed him for adhering to the proposed coercive measures, which seemed to him to stand alone, and to be unconnected with any other projects for the benefit of Ireland. He did not, however, concur in all the details of the Bill, which he thought should be limited as to its duration, and which was defective in the degrees of punishment apportioned to certain offences.

The Earl of Wicklow gave his hearty assent to the Ministerial plan.

The Earl of Clancarty objected to a clause in the Bill giving the lord-lieutenant power to send down into a disturbed district any number of resident magistrates or any additional police force he might think proper, and recommended communication with the local magistracy as likely to be more efficient.

Lord Campbell protested against the proposition of Lord Brougham, that power should be given to the

Executive to choose another place of trial. His noble and learned friend had said such a power was sanctioned by the law of England, but the House might rest assured it was not, and that it would be an encroachment on the liberty of the subject.

After a few words in explanation from Lord Brougham, Earl Grey said, that though some of the provisions in the Bill were repugnant to his feelings, he thought a case had been made out for arming the Government with additional powers. He could not, however, consider the present measure as disconnected with other plans for the amelioration of Ireland, and he thought the House should record, by a solemn vote, its opinion of the necessity of coupling this coercive Bill with others of a more comprehensive and statesmanlike nature. So strong was his opinion on this point, that if no other noble lord came forward, he should feel it his duty to move, on the third reading of the Bill, a resolution for an Address to Her Majesty, pledging their lordships not to rest satisfied with this measure alone.

After a few words from Lord Westmeath, the Bill was read a second time. Upon its going into Committee, Lord St. Germans proposed several amendments which the Government desired to introduce. They were principally these -to give the Bill a retrospective effect, by enabling the lord-lieutenant to charge on a district, already proclaimed under the existing law, the expenses of the supernumerary police employed there; to subject tea and coffee-shops to the visits of the police; to enact that all offences under the Act. should be tried at assizes of oyer and terminer or general gaol de

« AnteriorContinuar »