Abbildungen der Seite
PDF
EPUB

TABLE OF CASES.

WHICH HAVE BEEN

REVERSED, OVERRULED, AFFIRMED, FOLLOWED, ETC.

1. Ampt v. Cincinnati, affirmed by Supreme Court..........

56 O. S. 47 24. Ronnebaum v. Mt, Auburn v. Ry. Co., dismissed by Supreme Court for want of preparation.......

3 News 98 70. Norwalk Saving Bank Co. v. Spinning & Stamping Co., affirmed by Circuit Court........

......7 0. C. D. 275 145. Clark v. Commissioners, affirmed by Circuit Court........

..7 0. C. D, 427 151. Wright v. Heidorn, affirmed by Superior Court in General Term...

6 Dec. 315 200. State v. Post, reversed by Circuit Court.......

.7 0. C. D. 257 235. State v. Bd. of Ed., affirmed by Circuit Court..

..7 0. C. D. 338 240. State v, Commissioners, affirmed by Circuit Court.........

70. C. D. 351 265. State v. Ottman, followed and approved in Kowenstrot v. State................. 6 Dec, 451 305. Ohio Oil Co. v. Hurlburt, appealed to Circuit Court and decided on its merits ......

..........7 0. C. D. 421 313. Groenland v. State, exceptions to rulings of Common Pleas, overruled by Supreme Court......

5 News 43 367. Caldwell v. Commissioner, affirmed by Circuit Court, December 11, 1897 ... 80. C. D. 56 371. Davis v. Hutchins, reversed by Circuit Court, November 24, 1897...... .... 8 0. C. D. 52 494. Head v. Chesbrough, appealed to Circuit Court, and same judgment was rendered by that court....

..7 0. C. D. 176

Jan

REPORTS

OF

CASES ARGUED AND DETERMINED

IN

OHIO COURTS OF RECORD

EXCEPT SUPREME AND CIRCUIT.

SUPPLEMENT TO

THE OHIO LEGAL NEWS.

VOLUME VI, OHIO DECISIONS.

This Volume is to be cited as

6 OHIO DECISIONS,

or, abbreviated, 6 O. D.

NORWALK, O.,
['RE LANING PRINTING COMPANY,

1898.

Entered according to Act of Cougress in the year 1898

By THE LANING PRINTING CO. in the office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington.

Reo. May 2, 1900

TABLE OF CASES.

REPORTED IN VOLUME VI, OHIO DECISIONS.

..

Co .....

Aikin v. Spellman

409 Covington City Bank v. Wight's Ampt v. Cincinnati 1 Exrs

350 Andress, In re 174 Crane v. Ins. Co..

118 Andrew v. Settle..

160 Apollo Build. & Loan Co. v. Leedom 189

Davis v. Cincinnati.....

· 104 Atlas Natl. Bank v. Rheinstrom ...... 215

v. Hutchins

371

Dickmeier v. Pru. Ins. Co......... 161 Bancroft v. Wall... 22 Dietz v. Traction Co

513 Bank v. Hopple..... 182 Diller, In re ........

182 In re..... 105 Dinkelbihler v. State.

99 v. Metal Stamping Co...... 70. Donahue, In re

389 v. Rheinstrom 215 Drennen v. Shay.......

311 v. Rieck....... 331 Duhme, In re assignment.

52 Bank v. Wight's Exrs 350

448 Barbin v. Zetlmaier 188 Dye v. Dimick

2:1 Beetz v Strobel.......

143 Benedict v. Market National Bank.. 320 liastman v. State .

296 Bramlage v. Winder...... 319 Ehler, In re assignment...

309 Brooks-Waterfield Co. v. Walker 301 Electric Light Co. v. Gibson House Brush Electric Co. v. Warwick Elec.

148 Mfg. Co ... 475 Emery v. Cincinnati.

411 Build. & Loan Assn. v. Fromlet..... 184 v. Kuehnert

502 Falls River & Machine Co. v. Pullv. Leedom

189
man Co........

85 Burkhardt v. Hopple 127 Fenner v. Cincinnati

244 Fisher v. R. R. Co......

67 C., L. & W. R. R. Co. v. Reid........ 273 Fourth National Bank v. Hopple. 182 C., P. & V. R. R. Co. v. Village of Frantz v. Frantz .....

555 Hyde Park..... 327 Furgeson v. Cackler.......

119 Caldwell v Board of Commissioners 367 Childs v. Voris ... 75 Gamble v. Carlise.......

48 Cincinnati v. Railway Co....... 81 Gates v. Turnpike Co.

337 Clark v. Commissioners

145 Gellhaus v. Allemania L. & B. Assn 143 Cleveland City Ry. v. Cleveland 33 Gen. Elec. Co. v. Lima Elec. Ry. Co. 186 Cochrán v. Hirsch +1 Gentile v. Street Ry.....

111 Commercial Bank, In re

105 Gentry v. Standard Life Ins. Co..... 114 Commissioners v. Commissioners 533 Geringer v. Heinlein..

26 v. Dun... 348 Gosling v. Rupp.........

34.5 v. Easton

333 Graveson v. Odd Fellows Temple v. McClure 338 Co

287 v. Smith 338 Groenland v. State

313 Commonwealth Bldg. & Loan Co. v. Fromlet 184 Hall v. Kleeman.....

32: Consumers' Ice & Refr. Co.... 132 Head v. Chesbrough

19+ Cordes v. State 5 Heidorn v. Wright..

315

« ZurückWeiter »