1. Ampt v. Cincinnati, affirmed by Supreme Court.......... 56 O. S. 47 24. Ronnebaum v. Mt, Auburn v. Ry. Co., dismissed by Supreme Court for want of preparation..... 3 News 98 70. Norwalk Saving Bank Co. v. Spinning & Stamping Co., affirmed by Circuit Court............ .7 0. C. D. 275 145. Clark v. Commissioners, affirmed by Circuit Court........ .7 0. C. D. 427 151. Wright v. Heidorn, affirmed by Superior Court in General Term... 6 Dec, 315 200. State v. Post, reversed by Circuit Court....... .7 O. C. D. 257 235. State v. Bd. of Ed., affirnied by Circuit Court. .7 0. C. D. 338 240. State v, Commissioners, affirmed by Circuit Court........... 70. C. D. 351 265. State v. Ottman, followed and approved in Kowenstrot v. State..... 6 Dec, 451 305. Ohio Oil Co. v. Hurlburt, appealed to Circuit Court and decided on its ..7 0. C. D. 421 313. Groenland v. State, exceptions to rulings of Common Pleas, overruled by Supreme Court..... 5 News 43 367. Caldwell v. Commissioner, affirmed by Circuit Court, December 11, 1897 ... 8 0. C. D. 56 371. Davis v. Hutchins, reversed by Circuit Court, November 24, 1897...... 8 0. C. D. 52 494. Head v. Chesbrough, appealed to Circuit Court, and same judgment was rendered by that court.... .7 0. C. D. 176 merits ....... REPORTS OF CASES ARGUED AND DETERMINED IN OHIO COURTS OF RECORD EXCEPT SUPREME AND CIRCUIT. SUPPLEMENT TO THE OHIO LEGAL NEWS. VOLUME VI, OHIO DECISIONS. This Volume is to be cited as 6 OHIO DECISIONS, or, abbreviated, 6 O. D. NORWALK, O., 1898. 1 Entered according to Act of Congress in the year 1898 By THE LANING PRINTING CO. in the office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington. Rec. May May 2, 1900 TABLE OF CASES. REPORTEN IN VOLUME VI, OHIO DECISIONS. Aikin v. Spellman 109 Covington City Bank 1. Wight's Ampt v. Cincinnati 1 Exrs 350 Andress, In re 174 Crane v. Ins. Co 118 Andrew v. Settle.. 160 Apollo Build. & Loan Co. v. Leedom 189 Davis v. Cincinnati..... 104 Atas Natl. Bank v. Rheinstrom ..... 215 v. Hutchins 371 Dickmeier v. Pru. Ins. Co....... 161 Bancroft v. Wall... 2:2 Dietz v. Traction Co ... 513 Bank v. Hopple..... 182 Diller, In re ..... 182 In re..... 105 Dinkelbihler v. State. 99 1. Metal Stamping Co..... 70. Donahue, In re 389 v. Rheinstrom 215 Drennen v. Shay. 311 v. Rieck..... 331 Duhme, In re assignment. 526 Bank v. Wight's Exrs 359) 448 Barbin v. Zetlmaier 188 Dye v. Dimick 231 Beetz v Strobel.... 143 Benedict v. Market National Bank.. 3.20 fiastman v. State . 296 Bramlage v. Winder. 319 Ehler, In re assignment.... 309 Brooks-Waterfield Co. v. Walker ... 301 Electric Light Co. v. Gibson House Brush Electric Co. v. Warwick Elec. Co. 118 Mfg. Co .... 475 Emery v. Cincinnati.. 411 Build. & Loan Assn. V. Fromlet..... 184 v. Kuehnert 502 Falls River & Machine Co. v. Pullv. Leedom 189 8.3 Burkhardt v. Hopple 127 Fenner v. Cincinnati 244 Fisher v. R. R. Co........ 67 C., L. & W. R. R. Co. v. Reid........ 273 Fourth National Bank v. Hopple 182 C., P. & V. R. R. Co. 1. Village of Frantz v. Frantz..... 555 Hyde Park....... 327 Furgeson v'. Cackler. +19 Caldwell v Board of Commissioners 367 Childs v. l'oris 75 Gamble v. Carlise....... 48 Cincinnati v. Railway Co....... 81 Gates v. Turnpike Co. 337 Clark v. Commissioners 115 Gellhaus v. Allemania L. & B. Assn 13 Cleveland City Ry. v. Cleveland 33 Gei. Elec. Co. v. Lima Elec. Ry. Co. 180 Cochran v. Hirscli +1 Gentile v. Street Ry..... 111 Commercial Bank, In re 105 Gentry v. Standard Life Ins. Co..... 114 Commissioners v. Commissioners .. 533 Geringer v. Heinlein.. 26 v. Dun... 348 Gosling v. Rupp......... 34.5 v. Easton 333 Graveson v. Odd Fellows Temple v. McClure 338 Co ....... 287 v. Smith 338 Groenlaud v. State 313 Commonwealth Bldg. & Loan Co. v. Fromlet. 181 Hall v. Kleemail... 32: Consumers' Ice & Refr. Co.. 132 Head v. Chesbrough 19+ Cordes v. State . 5 Heidorn v. Wright... 315 |
0 Rezensionen Rezensionen werden nicht überprüft, Google sucht jedoch gezielt nach gefälschten Inhalten und entfernt diese Rezension schreiben |