Judiciary implications of draft registration--1980: hearings before the Subcommittee on Courts, Civil Liberties, and the Administration of Justice of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, Ninety-sixth Congress, second session, on the civil liberties and administration of justice implications of draft registration--1980, April 14 and May 22, 1980U.S. Government Printing Office, 1980 - 390 páginas |
Outras edições - Ver todos
Termos e frases comuns
active Administration AFEES alternative analysis area offices Armed Forces Army authority Blumstein and Nagin boards Budget Circuit civilian service classification combat Congress conscientious objector constitutional costs Court crime rates criminal sanctions Department of Defense DETERRENT EFFECT District draft evasion draft registration draft violation EMMPS enforcement enlistment estimate evaders evasion rate examination failure to register Federal included increase individual Individual Ready Reserve induction orders issue KASTENMEIER legislation military conscription Military Selective Service military service militia mobilization MSSA national service offense penalty percent personnel persons pre-mobilization President probability of conviction problems procedures proposed prosecution punishment question recruiting ROSTKER Selected Reserve Selective Service Act Selective Service System standby STANFORD LAW REVIEW statute supra note Thirteenth Amendment tion Total United United States Attorneys USPS variable Vietnam Vietnam War violation rate women
Passagens mais conhecidas
Página 143 - I exhort therefore, that, first of all, supplications, prayers, intercessions, and giving of thanks, be made for all men ; for kings, and for all that are in authority ; that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and honesty.
Página 291 - Congress, under the pretext of executing its powers, pass laws for the accomplishment of objects not entrusted to the Government; it would become the painful duty of this tribunal, should a case requiring such a decision come before it, to say that such an act was not the law of the land.
Página 298 - Whenever, on trial for a violation of this section, the defendant is shown to have, or to have had, possession of such opium or preparation or derivative thereof, such possession shall be deemed sufficient evidence to authorize conviction unless the defendant shall explain the possession to the satisfaction of the jury.
Página 63 - The following acts, or any of them, are crimes coming within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal for which there shall be individual responsibility: a) Crimes against Peace: namely, planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression, or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances, or participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the foregoing; b) War crimes : namely, violations of the laws or customs of war.
Página 49 - In each case [courts] must ask whether the gravity of the 'evil,' discounted by its improbability, justifies such invasion of free speech as is necessary to avoid the danger.
Página 285 - The circumstances that endanger the safety of nations are infinite, and for this reason no constitutional shackles can wisely be imposed on the power to which the care of it is committed. This power ought to be co-extensive with all the possible combinations of such circumstances; and ought to be under the direction of the same councils which are appointed to preside over the common defence.
Página 298 - Except as otherwise provided in this Act, it shall be the duty of every male citizen of the United States, and of every other male person residing In the United States...
Página 115 - AUS (RET.), EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, RESERVE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES Mr.
Página 285 - These powers ought to exist without limitation, because it is impossible to foresee or define the extent and variety of national exigencies, or the correspondent extent and variety of the means which may be necessary to satisfy them.
Página 63 - The fact that a person charged with an offence defined in this code acted pursuant to an order of his Government or of a superior does not relieve him of responsibility in international law if, in the circumstances at the time, it was possible for him not to comply with that order.