O que estão dizendo - Escrever uma resenha
Não encontramos nenhuma resenha nos lugares comuns.
Outras edições - Visualizar todos
Legal Masterpieces: Specimens of Argumentation and Exposition, Volume 1
Van Vechten Veeder
Visualização completa - 1912
action admitted answer appear apply argument authority bank called cargo carry cause character charge circumstances commerce common congress consequence consideration considered constitution construction contract corporation counsel court crime criminal crown death decision defendant direct doubt duty effect England established evidence execution exercise existence express extend fact gentlemen give given grant guilty human important indictment individual intention interest judge judgment judicial jurisdiction jury justice king learned legislative legislature libel limited Lord manner matter means measure ment mind murder nature necessary never objects obligation opinion original particular party passed person practice present principle prisoner prosecution protection proved published question reason received record regulate relation require respect rule sense ship supposed taken thing tion trial true Union United verdict whole
Página 443 - That all men have a natural and indefeasible right to worship Almighty God according to the dictates of their own consciences; that no man can, of right, be compelled to attend, erect, or support any place of worship, or to maintain any ministry against his consent...
Página 350 - It is the power to regulate; that is, to prescribe the rule by which commerce is to be governed. This power, like all others vested in Congress, is complete in itself, may be exercised to its utmost extent, and acknowledges no limitations other than are prescribed in the Constitution.
Página 350 - If, as has always been understood, the sovereignty of congress, though limited to specified objects, is plenary as to those objects, the power over commerce with foreign nations and among the several states is vested in congress as absolutely as it would be in a single government, having in its constitution the same restrictions on the exercise of the power as are found in the constitution of the United States.
Página 565 - February 28, 1795, provided, that, " in case of an insurrection in any State against the government thereof, it shall be lawful for the President of the United States, on application of the legislature of such State or of the executive, when the legislature cannot be convened, to call forth such number of the militia of any other State or States, as may be applied for, as he may judge sufficient to suppress such insurrection.
Página 282 - That the people have an original right to establish for their future government such principles as, in their opinion, shall most conduce to their own happiness, is the basis on which the whole American fabric has been erected. The exercise of this original right is a very great exertion, nor can it nor ought it to be frequently repeated. The principles therefore so established are deemed fundamental. And as the authority from which they proceed is supreme and can seldom act, they are designed to...
Página 427 - And he answered, and said unto them, My mother and my brethren are these, which hear the word of God, and do it.
Página 427 - And she said; Truth, Lord; yet the dogs eat of the crumbs which fall from their master's table.
Página 488 - By the law of the land is most clearly intended the general law; a law which hears before it condemns; which proceeds upon inquiry, and renders judgment only after trial.
Página 282 - The question whether an Act repugnant to the Constitution can become the law of the land, is a question deeply interesting to the United States ; but, happily, not of an intricacy proportioned to its interest. It seems only necessary to recognize certain principles, supposed to have been long and well established, to decide it.
Página 323 - It is a maxim not to be disregarded that general expressions, in every opinion, are to be taken in connection with the case in which those expressions are used. If they go beyond the case, they may be respected, but ought not to control the judgment in a subsequent suit when the very point is presented for decision.