Democracy as Public Deliberation: New PerspectivesThis collection of essays provides a fresh and original perspective on a theme at the center of current debates in democratic theory and practice. Such debates have originated in response to growing demands for fair and equal treatment of socially or culturally disadvantaged groups. The authors' arguments are based on a theory of public deliberation which could reshape current public policy towards social equality. |
Was andere dazu sagen - Rezension schreiben
Es wurden keine Rezensionen gefunden.
Inhalt
democracy as public deliberation | 1 |
Normative perspectives | xlvii |
MAURIZIO PASSERIN DENTRÈVES | xlvii |
Political legitimacy and democratic deliberation | 39 |
MAEVE COOKE | 53 |
MATTHEW FESTENSTEIN | 88 |
MICHAEL SAWARD | 112 |
JUDITH SQUIRES | 133 |
GRAHAM SMITH AND CORINNE WALES | 157 |
Inclusivity | 164 |
DAVID MILLER | 201 |
Is deliberation biased against disadvantaged groups? | 207 |
Alternatives to deliberation | 216 |
227 | |
Andere Ausgaben - Alle anzeigen
Häufige Begriffe und Wortgruppen
able acceptable actual argues argument autonomy basis Cambridge Chapter citizens citizenship civil claims Cohen collective conception concerned constitutional contemporary context critical cultural debate decision deliberative democracy deliberative obligations deliberative process democratic dialogue discussion effects engage epistemic equal erative example fact fairness formal give given grounds groups Habermas idea ideal impartiality important inclusiveness individuals institutions interests issues juries justice laws legitimate liberal matters means moral national identity normative notes obligations offer opinion original position outcomes participants particular perspectives pluralism political Political Liberalism possible practice preferences principles problem procedure proposal public deliberation public reason public sphere questions rational Rawls Rawls's reached regulative representation representative requires respect Saward seen sense social society standards structure suggest theory tion University Press valuable voting