Settlement- Married Woman- Derivative Settlement of Son A woman whose husband died in January, 1874, without ever having gained a settlement in Massachusetts lived in Boston from that time until her death, in 1889. She therefore gained a settlement in her own right, in Janu- ary, 1879, which was not affected by the retro- active provisions of St. 1879, c. 242. Her son became of age before she gained a settlement, and therefore did not derive one from her, and, since he has never gained one in his own right, he is an unsettled person.
Domicile-Set-
tlement, derived by Marriage
158 In Pub. Sts., c. 83, § 1, cl. 7, which provides that only such married women as have not a settlement" derived by marriage may gain a settlement by residence, the words "derived by marriage" signify an existing marriage.
Therefore, a married woman settled under a previous marriage, which has been terminated by the death of the husband, is not prevented from acquiring a new settlement by residence. Where a wife, deserted by her husband, re- mains for a period of more than twenty years where their joint domicile had been, she will not be debarred from gaining a settlement by the fact that he has had no settled place of resi- dence since the time of such desertion.
Settlement-Repeal of Statute.
Effect on Liability of City or Town 180 A settlement gained under Gen. Sts., c. 69, § 1, cl. 5, and completed before the enactment of the repealing statute, which expressly saves "all acts done or rights accruing" before the repeal takes effect, is not lost or affected by such repeal.
If by reason of a settlement a city or town has become liable for the support of a pauper, such liability is not taken away, nor is the right of another city or town, or of the Common-
Insane Person - Transfer to State Almshouse - Notice Where an insane person, who has been duly committed to and is a legal inmate of an insane hospital, is transferred by the State Board of Charity, by authority of St. 1888, c. 69, to the insane ward of the State Almshouse, notice of such transfer to the town liable for his support is not required.
Nor is the father of such person pauperized by his detention in the State Almshouse, his status being that of an insane person, and not that of a pauper.
PAUPER- Continued.
therein, but also the payment thereof, must be made within a period of five consecutive years.
Military Settlement - Desertion . 390 A person is not debarred from gaining a settlement under the provisions of R. L., c. 80, § 1, cl. 10, by reason of the fact that he absented himself from his command, and was thereafter found serving with other troops and was re- turned to his original regiment, where he re- mained until honorably discharged from the service of the United States, there being no evidence that such person was ever proved guilty of desertion.
Disease Dangerous to Public Health-Removal to State Hospi- tal-Expenses of Transportation. 499 The State Board of Charity is authorized, by R. L., c. 85, § 14, to direct the local authorities to remove to the State Hospital a State pauper found within the limits of their jurisdiction who is afflicted with the disease of leprosy; and in case such removal is ordered, the ex- pense of transportation must in the first in- stance be borne by the town, which is entitled to subsequent reimbursement from the Com- monwealth "for the excess over thirty miles by the usual route, at a rate not exceeding three cents a mile," in accordance with the provisions of R. L., c. 85, § 9.
The Attorney-General has authority to file an information where the application for the filing of such information alleges that the respondent was unlawfully appointed to a public office, and holds it in violation of law.
It is not necessary that the Attorney-General should be satisfied that the information which he is called upon to sign can be maintained, if the questions raised by it are doubtful, and the matter is one of public importance which can- not otherwise be determined.
When at a first meeting of the members-elect of the common council of the city of Boston the senior member took the chair, and, after calling the council to order, entertained and declared carried a motion to adjourn, and im- mediately left the chair, refusing to entertain a doubt of the vote, expressed by one of the members, the rights of the members-elect were not concluded by such adjournment, and they might select some other person to take the chair, and proceed with the organization of the council.
When a presiding officer of the common council is elected under proceedings of doubt- ful validity, the records of which, duly made and signed by the clerk, are approved at a sub- sequent meeting, such approval is a ratification of whatever irregularities existed in the origi- nal election, notwithstanding the fact that such record was not read, and that the clerk was a de facto official, holding over from the previous year.
The acts of a de facto clerk have all the force of those of a clerk de jure until they are di- rectly impeached by a proceeding brought to test the legality of his office.
Quo Warranto- Attorney-General See ATTORNEY-GENERAL. 7.
Election Officers-Misconduct - Elec- tion Precinct-Quo Warranto- Attorney-General.
See AUSTRALIAN BALLOT LAW. 7.
PUBLICATION, STATE BOARD OF. See STATE BOARD OF PUBLICA-
QUO WARRANTO-Information in Equity-Right to take Fish from the Sea-Penal Statute-At- torney-General
See ATTORNEY-GENERAL. 6.
Public Officer-Police Commissioner of Boston-Attorney-General See ATTORNEY-GENERAL. 7.
City Council - Organization - Rati- fication of Irregularities Acts of De Facto Official-Attorney-General 635 See PUBLIC OFFICERS.
A person who presents himself as a candi- date for examination for registration as a phar- macist is not necessarily debarred therefrom because he is unable to speak, read or write the English language.
Suspension of License or Certificate of Registration Conviction . 482 The Board of Registration in Pharmacy, under R. L., c. 76, § 17, which provides in part that "the license or certificate of registration of a registered pharmacist shall not be sus- pended for a cause punishable by law until after his conviction by a court of competent jurisdiction," may suspend the certificate of registration or license of a registered pharmacist who has been duly found guilty of the illegal sale of intoxicating liquors and sentenced to pay a fine therefor, and who has paid such fine, notwithstanding the fact that exceptions thereto have been filed and allowed, and are still pend- ing for argument before the Supreme Judicial Court.
The Board of Registration in Pharmacy is not required to examine an applicant for a cer- ficate as a pharmacist, if it has revoked a license formerly issued to him.
R. L., c. 100, § 22, providing that a regis- tered pharmacist who owns stock of the actual value of at least five hundred dollars in a cor- poration which has been incorporated for the purpose of carrying on the drug business, and who conducts in person the business of a store of such corporation, shall be considered as actively engaged in business on his own ac- count, and as qualified to receive a license for such store," is not applicable to a copartnership. R. L., c. 100, §§ 49, 50, regulating the trans- portation of "spirituous or intoxicating liquor," extend to and include alcohol.
« AnteriorContinuar » |