The Legislature may provide that whenever the Commonwealth or any county therein, enters into a contract with any person, firm or corporation, for the doing of public work of any nature, it shall be stipulated that such person, firm or corporation shall pay employees no lower rate of wages per day than is paid by the Commonwealth, or by such county, for similar work; but such a provision, as affecting cities and towns, would be unconstitutional, and can- not be cured by making the provision operative only upon acceptance by a majority of the voters of such cities and towns.
Local authorities in the various cities and towns of the Commonwealth have no authority under existing laws to regulate or restrict the display of advertisements beyond the limits of public parks, boulevards and ways.
A bill providing that the authorities having charge of parks or parkways may make such reasonable rules and regulations respecting the display of signs, posters or advertisements, near and visible from public parks or boulevards, as they may deem necessary for preserving the objects for which parks or boulevards are estab- lished and maintained, and that, after publica- tion of such regulations, any sign, poster or advertisement maintained in violation of them shall be a public nuisance, is a valid exercise of the police power, and neither owners of prop- erty affected, nor persons having contracts for
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-Continued. advertising prevented thereby from performing the same, would be entitled to compensation.
Vested Rights-Obligations of Con- tract-Feoffees of Grammar School in Ipswich
Under St. 1786, c. 54, making perpetual the agreement set forth in Acts of 1765, c. 5, be- tween the feoffees representing the original donors of land for a grammar school in Ipswich and the town of Ipswich, to the effect that four feoffees on behalf of private individuals and the three selectmen of the town of Ipswich for the time being, on behalf of the town, should be incorporated feoffees in trust for the manage- ment of such school, the rights of each group of trustees became vested, as well as the rights of the beneficiaries under the trust; and a bill to increase to six the number of feoffees on the part of the town would be unconstitutional, as impairing the obligation of the contract, and destroying the vested rights without due proc- ess of law.
Maximum Day's Work for Employ-
ees of Cities, Towns and Counties. 442 The Legislature may constitutionally limit the duration of a day's work for laborers, work- men and mechanics, employed by or in behalf of the Commonwealth, to a period of eight hours; but a like provision applicable to coun- ties, and to cities and towns which have ac- cepted the provisions of R. L., c. 106, § 20, making eight hours a day's work for the em- ployees thereof, would be unconstitutional, as taking property without due compensation and without due process of law.
In respect of legislation fixing eight hours as a day's work for employees of counties, cities and towns, a county is not to be distinguished from a city or town.
Eminent Domain - Damages Appro priation-Land taken in South
Collection of Loan-Security.
If upon the forfeiture of the shares and the foreclosure of a mortgage respectively pledged and executed by a stockholder in a co-operative bank, to secure a loan from such bank, the amount realized therefrom is not sufficient to discharge the loan, the balance remaining un- paid becomes a debt which is presently due and may be recovered by suit forthwith, like any other loan.
Loan -Security-Second Mortgage 462 The purpose of R. L., c. 114, § 14, providing that every loan made by a co-operative savings bank shall be secured by a mortgage of real estate situated within the Cominonwealth, and unencumbered by any mortgage or lien "other than such as may be held by the bank making the loan," was to secure the result that property mortgaged to a co-operative savings bank should not be subjected to any liens or mortgages other than those held by the bank itself; and such statute does not forbid a second mortgage upon property upon which the same bank holds a first mortgage, provided that such property is not thereby encumbered to an amount exceed- ing its real value.
CO-OPERATIVE SAVINGS BANKS
4. - Consolidation-Rights of Minority - Constitutional Law
The Legislature has no power to compel the minority members in an existing co-operative bank, which is not a stock corporation, to sur- render their interest in such bank in exchange for an interest in a consolidated bank, as pre- scribed in House Bill, No. 1181; but if enacted, the provisions of such bill will govern the rights of all members of co-operative banks organized after its passage, and will serve to authorize the consolidation of existing co-operative banks, if such consolidation is assented to by all the members.
St. 1899, c. 199, repeals so much of Pub. Sts., c. 106, § 7, as imposed a maximum limit of one million dollars upon the capital of a manufac- turing corporation formed under general laws.
Election of Officers Attorney
The election of the officers of a corporation is a corporate function, which cannot be delegated without express statutory authority.
The statutes do not contain such authority, but, on the contrary, by clear intendment re- quire that such officers shall be elected by the members of the corporation; and a by-law which delegates to the board of directors of a co-operative bank the election or selection of the secretary, treasurer or other officers of the bank is therefore illegal.
An attorney is not an officer of the corpora- tion, and cannot be made one by the by-laws.
COUNTY-Sheriff-Supplies for Private
The sheriff of Norfolk County, who also acts as master of the house of correction therein, is not entitled to have all necessary provisions for himself and his family furnished by and at the expense of such county.
COUNTY ACCOUNTS-Officers-
-Service of Warrants Officers serving warrants are entitled to charge for services and expenses. The charge for services comprises fifty cents for each per- son upon whom service is made, and an allow- ance for "travel." Expenses are limited to actual and necessary disbursements, and may be charged in addition to the item of construct- ive travel.
Railroad fares are not included in "travel," and may be charged in addition thereto.
If an officer has charged twice for expenses, the amount may be withheld in any further settlement between him and the paymaster or clerk whose duty it is to pay him.
If an officer knowingly charges for expenses which he did not incur, it constitutes the offence of obtaining money under false pre-
DANVERS INSANE HOSPITAL- Water Supply - Contract_with Town of Danvers-New Build- ing-Trustees
Under a contract in force between the Com- monwealth and the town of Danvers, by which it is agreed that the Commonwealth may take, free of charge, water from the water supply of the town for the use of the Danvers In- sane Hospital, "and of all buildings that at any time may be owned by the State on the grounds; and also for use on the grounds themselves, as now laid out, for any purpose,' the Commonwealth may, without payment, take water from the town supply for use in and for a building upon land acquired subsequent to the making of such contract, but not for any independent use upon the grounds so acquired.
"DAY'S WORK" For Employees of Street Railway
Fees and Expenses before Trial Justices Constructive Repeal Since it was the intention of the Legislature, in St. 1891, c. 325, to make proceedings before trial justices in all respects like those before the inferior courts of record, a provision in St. 1890, c. 440, which is at variance with such intention, is constructively repealed.
DE FACTO OFFICIAL-Retention of Civil Service Appointee after Pro- bationary Period
See CIVIL SERVICE. 4.
Acts of City Council - Organiza- tion-Ratification of Irregularities Quo Warranto-Attorney-Gen- eral
See PUBLIC OFFICERS.
Co-operative Savings Bank-Proxy Voting See CO-OPERATIVE
DISEASE-Dangerous to Public Health
-Pauper-Removal to State Hos- pital-Expense
See PAUPER. 19.
DISCONTINUANCE- Of State High-
St. 1897, c. 500, § 17, which authorizes the con- struction by the Boston Transit Commission of the East Boston Tunnel, and its subsequent lease to the Boston Elevated Railway Com- pany, at an annual rental fixed thereby and payable to the city of Boston, by pledging such rental, together with the tolls which the city is directed to collect from persons passing through such tunnel, "to meet the principal and in- terest of the bonds issued to pay for the con- struction of said tunnel," and expressing such pledge upon the face of the bonds "as one of the terms thereof," creates a valid contract between the city of Boston and the purchasers of such bonds which cannot be impaired by subsequent legislation; and House Bill, No. 1192, which abolishes such tolls and instead thereof requires the city of Boston to set aside from the com- pensation received by it from the Boston Ele- vated Railway Company under St. 1897, c. 500, $10, a sum equal to the amount which it would have received from such tolls, to be pledged in like manner to meet the principal and interest of the bonds, for the reason that it varies the terms of such contract by substituting for the source of income pledged to secure the bond- holders another and different source of income, is unconstitutional and void.
Westford Academy is a private school, and is "not under the order and superintendence of the authorities of the town" of Westford, and the State Board of Education may refuse to approve it, either for the purpose of authoriz- ing the town of Westford to pay the tuition of children living therein and attending that acad- emy, under St. 1895, c. 94, or for the purpose of securing to other towns reimbursement by the Commonwealth of money expended for the tu- ition of children in that academy, under the provisions of St. 1898, c. 496, § 3.
EMINENT DOMAIN-Land taken in South Bay - Damages - Appro- priation Constitutional Law Harbor and Land Commissioners 72 The Board of Harbor and Land Commis- sioners is not precluded from taking areas in South Bay in the city of Boston, under author- ity of St. 1899, c. 469, because no specific sum is appropriated by that act to pay damages for such takings. The act does appropriate so much money as may be necessary to pay the damages which may be assessed under it, and it is therefore constitutional.
« AnteriorContinuar » |