O que estão dizendo - Escrever uma resenha
Não encontramos nenhuma resenha nos lugares comuns.
Outras edições - Visualizar todos
acts of Congress Annals of Congress approved Articles of Confederation August 15 authority bill of attainder Boudin ciary considered Consti constitutionality contrary control over legislation convention council of revision decided decision defending delegates doctrine of judicial duty Edmund Randolph Elbridge Gerry Elliot's Debates Ellsworth encroachments ernment established evidence executive exercise expositors expressly Farrand favor federal Constitution Federalist framers Gerry give Gouverneur Morris gress Hamilton Hayburn's Ibid independence infra instrument interests Jefferson judges judi judicial control judicial department judicial power Judiciary Act judiciary department jurisdiction Justice lative lature law void legis legislative act legislature limits Madison majority mandamus Marbury Marshall ment negative North Carolina officers opinion pass Pennsylvania Philadelphia Philadelphia convention popular power to declare proposition provision question ratified regarded representatives repugnant revisionary power Rhode Island Senate Spaight statutes Supreme Court tion tution Union United vention veto Virginia vote Wilson written constitutions
Página 44 - By the twenty-filth section of the judiciary act of seventeen hundred and eighty-nine, it is provided, "that a final judgment or decree in any suit in the highest court of law or equity of a state, in which a decision in the suit could be had...
Página 122 - If the former part of the alternative be true, then a legislative act, contrary to the constitution, is not law: if the latter part be true, then written constitutions are absurd attempts, on the part of the people, to limit a power, in its own nature, illimitable.
Página 39 - Nor can any man, who acknowledges the being of God, be justly deprived or abridged of any civil right as a citizen, on account of his religious sentiments or peculiar mode of religious worship...
Página 124 - The judicial power of the United States is extended to all cases arising under the Constitution. Could it be the intention of those who gave this power, to say that in using it the Constitution should not be looked into? That a case arising under the Constitution should be decided without examining the instrument under which it arises? This is too extravagant to be maintained.
Página 23 - The complete independence of the courts of justice is peculiarly essential in a limited Constitution. By a limited Constitution I understand one which contains certain specified exceptions to the legislative authority; such, for instance, as that it shall pass no bills of attainder, no ex post facto laws, and the like.
Página 125 - It is also not entirely unworthy of observation, that in declaring what shall be the supreme law of the land, the Constitution itself is first mentioned; and not the laws of the United States generally, but those only which shall be made in pursuance of the Constitution, have that rank.
Página 50 - Nay, more, if the whole Legislature, an event to be deprecated, should attempt to overleap the bounds prescribed to them by the people, I, in administering the public justice of the country, will meet the united powers at my seat in this tribunal and, pointing to the constitution, will say to them, here is the limit of your authority, and hither shall you go, but no further.
Página 72 - defines the extent of the powers of the general government. If the general legislature should, at any time, overleap their limits, the judicial department is a constitutional check. If the United States go beyond their powers, if they make a law which the Constitution does not authorize, it is void; and the judiciary power, the national judges, who, to secure their impartiality, are to be made independent, will declare it to be void.
Página 122 - It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is. Those who apply the rule to particular cases, must of necessity expound and interpret that rule. If two laws conflict with each other, the courts must decide on the operation of each.