 | Theodore Sedgwick - 1857 - 770 páginas
...charter, a party who has had the benefit of the agreement cannot be permitted, in an action founded on it, to question its validity. It would be in the highest degree inequitable and unjust, to permit the defendant to repudiate a contract the fruits of which he retains. f And the principle... | |
 | Theodore Sedgwick - 1857 - 774 páginas
...founded on it, to question its validity. It would be in the highest degree inequitable and unjust, to permit the defendant to repudiate a contract the fruits of which he retains.f And the principle of this exception has been extended to other cases. So a person who has... | |
 | New York (State) - 1867 - 1086 páginas
...loan. When it is a question of capacity to contract, a party who has had the benefit of the contract cannot be permitted in an action founded upon it to question its validity (Steam Navigation. Co. v. Weed, 17 Barb. 378). a. A. positive denial in an answer will not prevail... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1874 - 728 páginas
...charter, a party who has had the benefit of the agreement cannot be permitted in an action founded on it to question its validity. It would be in the highest degree inequitable and unjust to permit the defendant to repudiate * Qelpcku r. Dubuque, 1 Wallace, 175. f Bulz v. Muscatine, 8 Wallace,... | |
 | Theodore Sedgwick - 1874 - 750 páginas
...charter, a party who has had the benefit of the agreement cannot be permitted, in an action founded on it, to question its validity. It would be in the highest degree inequitable and unjust, to permit the defendant to repudiate a contract the fruits of which he retains, f And the principle... | |
 | Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, Michael Crawford Kerr, James Buckley Black, Augustus Newton Martin, Francis Marion Dice, John Worth Kern, John Lewis Griffiths, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy - 1875 - 674 páginas
...charter, a party who has had the benefit of the agreement can not be permitted, in an action founded on it, to question its validity. It would be in the highest degree inequitable and unjust, to permit the defendant to repudiate a contract the fruits of which he retains. And the principle of... | |
 | United States. Circuit Court (5th Circuit), William Burnham Woods - 1876 - 812 páginas
...organization or of powers conferred by the charter, a party who has had the benefit of the contract cannot be permitted in an action founded upon it to question its validity. Navigation Company v. Wtcd, 17 Barb., 378; see also Dispatch Line v. Bellamy Man. Company, 12 K. H.,... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1879 - 696 páginas
...organization or of power conferred by the charter, a party who has had the benefit of the agreement cannot be permitted in an action founded upon it to...would be in the highest degree inequitable and unjust to permit a defendant to repudiate a contract, the benefit of which he retains." What is said in the... | |
 | 1879 - 552 páginas
...power conferred by the cha-- ter, a party who had the benefit of the agreement can not be permuted in an action founded upon it to question its validity....would be in the highest degree inequitable and unjust to permit a defendant to repudiate a contract, the benefit of which he retains." What is said in the... | |
 | Irving Browne - 1880 - 638 páginas
...organization or of power conferred by the charter, a party who has had the benefit of the agreement cannot be permitted in an action founded upon it to...would be in the highest degree inequitable and unjust to permit a defendant to repudiate a contract, the benefit of which he retains." What is said in the... | |
| |
Where it is a simple question of authority to contract, arising either on a question of regularity of organization or of power conferred by the charter, a party who has had the benefit of the agreement cannot be permitted in an action founded upon it... 
