De dentro do livro
Resultados 1-3 de 72
Página 462
1960 ) , and held improper by this Court . [ 9 ] It is the ship owner ' s absolute and
nondelegable duty to furnish to sea - men and to others to whom that duty is
owing a seaworthy vessel . “ A longshore - man does not assume the risk of negli
...
1960 ) , and held improper by this Court . [ 9 ] It is the ship owner ' s absolute and
nondelegable duty to furnish to sea - men and to others to whom that duty is
owing a seaworthy vessel . “ A longshore - man does not assume the risk of negli
...
Página 498
1947 ) . or impliedly authorized to permit another to drive his automobile and that
, in absence of any such authority or actual negligence on part of salesman , the
employer could not be held liable , regardless of whether salesman and driver ...
1947 ) . or impliedly authorized to permit another to drive his automobile and that
, in absence of any such authority or actual negligence on part of salesman , the
employer could not be held liable , regardless of whether salesman and driver ...
Página 512
The Mississippi court held the contract provision invalid and allowed recovery .
The Supreme Court , by a unanimous decision , reversed . The local contacts of
Florida , in the case before us , are certainly no more , and in our view are less ...
The Mississippi court held the contract provision invalid and allowed recovery .
The Supreme Court , by a unanimous decision , reversed . The local contacts of
Florida , in the case before us , are certainly no more , and in our view are less ...
O que estão dizendo - Escrever uma resenha
Não encontramos nenhuma resenha nos lugares comuns.
Outras edições - Visualizar todos
Termos e frases comuns
action affirmed agree agreement alleged amount appellant's appellee application Attorney authority Board cause charge Chief Judge Circuit Judge Cite as 319 City claims Company completed condition considered constitute construction contention contract corporation counsel Court of Appeals decision defendant denied determination direct District Court effect employees engine entered evidence examiner fact federal filed funds further Government guilty held indicated interest invention involved issue judgment June jurisdiction jury L.Ed Labor limited matter means ment motion negligence NUMBER Office operation opinion parties patent person plaintiff position present prior proceeding question reason received record reference rejection Relations result rule S.Ct Securities sentence specific statement statute strike tion trial union United violation Washington witness York