...or navy. Thus, to give another and fifth example, a State is, in spite of its territorial supremacy, not allowed to alter the natural conditions of its...disadvantage of the natural conditions of the territory of a neighbouring State — for instance, to stop or to divert the flow of a river which runs from its own...

...comprehensive. Thus to give another and fifth example, a state is, in spite of its territorial supremacy, not allowed to alter the natural conditions of its own territory to the disadvantage of th« natural conditions of the territory of a neighbouring state — for instance, to stop or to divert...

...IV. (1910), pp. 208-229. 1 As regards the question of levy- 3 See Annuaire, IX. p. 182. I State is allowed to alter the natural conditions of its (own territory to the disadvantage of the natural conI ditions of the territory of a neighbouring State. For . this reason a State is not only forbidden...

...of action. Thus, by customary International law a State is, in spite of its territorial supremacy, not allowed to alter the natural conditions of its...disadvantage of the natural conditions of the territory of a neighbouring State — for instance, to stop or to divert the flow of a river which runs from its own...

...the prejudice of a lower is alleged to be of flow of forbidden on the principle that ' no State is allowed to alter the natural conditions of its own...disadvantage of the natural conditions of the territory of a neighbouring state', and the same principle applies to the use of the river so as to cause danger to...

...encroach upon the other bank of the river, and as no State is allowed to alter the natural condition of its own territory to the disadvantage * of the natural conditions of a neighbouring State territory, a State cannot build embankments, and the like, of such kind without...

...action. * * * Thus, to give another and fifth example, a State i, in spite of its territorial supremacy, not allowed to alter the natural conditions of its...conditions of the territory of a neighboring State — for instance, to stop or to divert the flow of a river which funs from its own into neighboring...

...arbitrary power of one of the riparian states, for it is a rule of international law that no state is allowed to alter the natural conditions of its own...territory to the disadvantage of the natural conditions of a territory of a neighboring State. For this reason a State is not only forbidden to stop or to divert...

...that a State must not abuse its rights under international law by allowing alternation of the national conditions of its own territory to the disadvantage of the natural conditions of the territory of another State." It is important to note that the decision of the tribunal in the Trail Smelter case...

...that a State must not abuse its rights under international law by allowing alternation of the national conditions of its own territory to the disadvantage of the natural conditions of the territory of another State." It is important to note that the decision of the tribunal in the Trail Smelter ease...