Abbildungen der Seite
PDF
EPUB

Presser v. State of Illinois, 116 U.S. | Springer v. The United States, 102 252, pp. 358, 360. U.S. 586, p. 246.

Prigg v. Pennsylvania, 16 Pet. 539, State Freight Tax, 15 Wall. 232, p. 308.

p. 201.

Pumpelly v. Green Bay Company, 13 State Tax on Railway Gross Receipts, Wall. 166, p. 367. 15 Wall. 284, pp. 195, 272. State Tonnage Tax, 12 Wall. 204, p. 275.

R.

Rahrer, Ex parte, 140 U.S. 545, p. 204.
Railway Co. v. Whitton, 13 Wall.

270, p. 306.

Ratterman v. Western Union Tel. Co.,

127 U.S. 411, p. 197.

Rector of Christ's Church v. County of Philadelphia, 24 How. 300, p. 263.

Reed, Ex parte, 100 U.S. 13, p. 238. Reynolds v. United States, 98 U. S. 145, p. 357.

Strawder v. West Virginia, 100 U.S. 303, p. 389.

Stuart v. Laird, 1 Cr. 299, p. 303. Sturges v. Crowninshield, 4 Whea. 122, pp. 207, 213–255.

Swartwout, Ex parte, 4 Cr. 75, p. 320.

T.

Tarble's Case, 13 Wall. 397, p. 237. Telegraph Co. v. Texas, 105 U.S. 460, p. 197.

Rhode Island v. Massachusetts, 12 Tennessee v. Davis, 100 U.S. 257,

Pet. 657, p. 308.

p. 313.

Robbins v. Shelby Taxing District, Tennessee v. Sneed, 96 U.S. 69, p. 266. 120 U.S. 489, p. 201.

S.

Santa Clara County v. South Pacific

Railroad, 118 U.S. 394, p. 392. Satterlee v. Matthewson, 2 Pet. 380, p. 258.

Scholey v. Reid, 23 Wall. 331, p. 178. Schooner Hoppet v. The United States, 7 Cr. 389, p. 221.

Seibert v. Lewis, 122 U.S. 284, p. 266. Sherlock v. Alling, 93 U.S. 99, pp. 202, 203.

Siebold, Ex parte, 100 U.S. 371, p. 174. Simmons v. United States, 142 U.S. 148, p. 370.

Terret v. Taylor, 9 Cr. 43, p. 356. Texas v. White, 7 Wall. 700, pp. 162, 346.

Thompson v. Whitman, 18 Wall. 457,

p. 330.

Tiernan v. Rinker, 102 U.S. 123, p. 195.

Trade Mark Case, 100 U.S. 82, p. 219.

Tucker v. Ferguson et al., 22 Wall. 527, p. 266.

U.

United States v. Aaron Burr, 4 Cr. 470, Appendix, p. 320.

United States v. Ballin, 144 U.S. 1, p. 176.

Slaughter House Cases, 16 Wall. 36, United States v. Bevans, 3 Whea. 336, pp. 387, 389, 392.

p. 307.

Smith v. Alabama, 124 U.S. 465, United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. p. 195. 542, pp. 357, 369, 390-398. Smith v. State of Maryland, 18 How. United States v. Dunnington, 146 71, pp. 194, 311.

Society &c. v. New Haven, 8 Whea. United States v. Eaton, 144 U.S. 677, 464, p. 352.

U.S. 338, p. 327.

p. 369.

p. 172.

Spraigue v. Thompson, 118 U.S. 90, United States v. Ferreira, 13 How. 40, p. 202.

United States v. Fisher, 2 Cr. 358, | Vicksburg v. Tobin, 100 U.S. 480, p. 185. p. 194. United States v. Gratiot, 14 Pet. 526, | Vidal v. Girard's Executors, 2 How. p. 341.

United States v. Hudson, 7 Cr. 32, Virginia, Ex parte, 100 U.S. 399, p. 307.

127, p. 356.

p. 390.

p. 390.

Wall. 535, p. 265.

United States v. Insurgents, 2 Dall. Virginia v. Rives, 100 U.S. 313, 335, p. 319.

United States v. Jung Ah Lung, 124 Von Hoffman v. City of Quincy, 4

U.S. 621, p. 294.

United States v. Klein, 13 Wall. 128, p. 284.

United States v. Marigold, 9 How. 560, p. 216.

United States v. Mitchell, 2 Dall. 348, p. 319.

W.

Wabash, St. Louis, and Pacific Railway Co. v. Illinois, 118 U.S. 557, p. 195.

United States v. Morey, 3 Cr. 159, Walker v. Whitehead, 16 Wall. 314, p. 306. p. 266.

United States v. Ortega, 11 Whea. Wallach et al. v. Van Riswick, 92 467, p. 308. U.S. 202, p. 326. United States v. Padelford, 9. Wall. Walling v. Michigan, 116 U.S. 446, 531, p. 283. p. 204.

United States v. Palmer, 3 Whea. 610, Walston v. Nevin, 128 U.S. 578, p. p. 220. 392.

United States v. Railroad Company, Ware v. Hylton, 3 Dall. 199, pp. 289, 17 Wall. 322, p. 178. 352.

United States v. Rauscher, 119 U.S. Waring v. Clarke, 5 How. 441, p. 311. 407, p. 296.

Waring v. The Mayor, 8 Wall. 110, p. 272.

United States v. Reese et al., 92 U.S. 214, p. 398. Watkins, Ex parte, 3 Pet. 193, p. 239. United States v. Rogers, 4 How. 567, Watson v. Mercer, 8 Pet. 88, p. 258. p. 342. Wells, Ex parte, 18 How. 307, p. 281. United States v. Scott, 3 Wall. 642, West Wisconsin R.R. Co. v. Superp. 228. visors, 93 U.S. 595, p. 266.

United States v. Texas, 143 U.S. 621, Western Union Telegraph Co. v. p. 314.

United States v. Union Pacific R.R.
Co., 98 U.S. 569, p. 313.

United States v. Wilson, 7 Pet. 150,
p. 281.

V.

Pendleton, 122 U.S. 347, pp. 197, 354.

Weston v. City Council of Charleston, 2 Pet. 449, p. 180.

Wharton's International Law, Chap,

XI. 275, p. 240.

Wheaton v. Peters, 8 Pet. 591, p. 219.

Vallandigham, Ex parte, 1 Wall. 243, Wheeling Bridge Co., 13 How. 518, pp. 237, 303.

p. 194.

Van Allen v. Assessors, 3 Wall. 573, White v. Hart, 13 Wall. 646, p. 265. p. 182.

Veazie Bank v. Fenno, 8 Wall. 533, p. 245.

Veazie v. Moor, 14 How. 568, p. 194.

Willamette Iron Bridge Co., 125 U.S. 1, p. 194.

Williams v. Bruffy, 102 U.S. 248, p. 380.

Wilson, Ex parte, 114 U.S. 417, p. | Woodruff v. Trapnall, 10 How. 190, 365.

p. 262.

Wilson v. McNamee, 102 U.S. 572, Worcester v. State of Georgia, 6 Pet. p. 202.

515, p. 287.

Wurts v. Houghland, 114 U.S. 606, p. 392.

Wilson v. The Blackbird Creek Marsh Co., 2 Pet. 245, pp. 202, 269. Wiscart v. Dauchy, 3 Dall. 321, p. 315. Withers v. Buckley, 20 How. 84, Yarborough, Ex parte, 110 U.S. 651, p. 366. pp. 173, 398.

Y.

Woodruff v. Parham, 8 Wall. 123, Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356, pp. 202, 272.

pp. 294, 391.

THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE.

1776.1

IN CONGRESS, JULY 4, 1776.

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America.

WHEN in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the

1 The delegates of the United Colonies of New Hampshire; Massachusetts Bay; Rhode Island and Providence Plantations; Connecticut; New York; New Jersey; Pennsylvania; New Castle, Kent, and Sussex, in Delaware; Maryland; Virginia; North Carolina, and South Carolina, In Congress assembled at Philadelphia, Resolved on the 10th of May, 1776, to recommend to the respective assemblies and conventions of the United Colonies, where no government sufficient to the exigencies of their affairs had been established, to adopt such a government as should, in the opinion of the representatives of the people, best conduce to the happiness and safety of their constituents in particular, and of America in general. A preamble to this resolution, agreed to on the 15th of May, stated the intention to be totally to suppress the exercise of every kind of authority under the British crown. On the 7th of June, certain resolutions respecting independency were moved and seconded. On the 10th of June it was resolved, that a committee should be appointed to prepare a declaration to the following effect: "That the United Colonies are, and of right ought to be, free and independent States; that they are absolved from all allegiance to the British crown; and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain is, and ought to be, totally dissolved." On the preceding day it was determined that the committee for preparing the declaration should consist of five, and they were chosen accordingly, in the following order: Mr. Jefferson, Mr. J. Adams, Mr. Franklin, Mr. Sherman, Mr. R. R. Livingston. On the 11th of June a resolution was passed to appoint a commit

Powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Eaws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they

tee to prepare and digest the form of a confederation to be entered into between the colonies, and another committee to prepare a plan of treaties to be proposed to foreign powers. On the 12th of June, it was resolved, that a committee of Congress should be appointed by the name of a board of war and ordinance, to consist of five members. On the 25th of June, a declaration of the deputies of Pennsylvania, met in provincial conference, expressing their willingness to concur in a vote declaring the United Colonies free and independent States, was laid before Congress and read. On the 28th of June, the committee appointed to prepare a declaration of independence brought in a draught, which was read, and ordered to lie on the table. On the 1st of July, a resolution of the convention of Maryland, passed the 28th of June, authorizing the deputies of that colony to concur in declaring the United Colonies free and independent States, was laid before Congress and read. On the same day Congress resolved itself into a committee of the whole, to take into consideration the resolution respecting independency. On the 2d of July, a resolution declaring the colonies free and independent States, was adopted. A declaration to that effect was, on the same and following days, taken into further consideration. Finally, on the 4th of July, the Declaration of Independence was agreed to, engrossed on paper, signed by John Hancock as president, and directed to be sent to the several assemblies, conventions, and committees, or councils of safety, and to the several commanding officers of the continental troops, and to be proclaimed in each of the United States, and at the head of the Army. It was also ordered to be entered upon the Journals of Congress, and on the 2d of August, a copy engrossed on parchment was signed by all but one of the fifty-six signers whose names are appended to it. That one was Matthew Thornton, of New Hampshire, who on taking his seat in November asked and obtained the privilege of signing it. Several who signed it on the 2d of August were absent when it was adopted on the 4th of July, but, approving of it, they thus signified their approbation.

NOTE. The proof of this document, as published above, was read by Mr. Ferdinand Jefferson, the Keeper of the Rolls at the Department of State, at Washington, who compared it with the fac-simile of the original in his custody. He says: "In the fac-simile, as in the original, the whole instrument runs on without a break, but dashes are mostly inserted. I have, in this copy, followed the arrangement of paragraphs adopted in the publication of the Declaration in the newspaper of John Dunlap, and as printed by him for the Congress, which printed copy is inserted in the original Journal of the old Congress. The same paragraphs are also made by the author, in the original draught preserved in the Department of State."

« ZurückWeiter »