I consider, then, the power to annul a law of the United States, assumed by one State, incompatible with the existence of the Union, contradicted expressly by the letter of the Constitution, unauthorized by its spirit, inconsistent with every principle... Abridgment of the Debates of Congress, from 1789 to 1856: Dec. 3, 1832-July ... - Seite 27von United States. Congress, Thomas Hart Benton - 1860Vollansicht - Über dieses Buch
| Henry Mann - 1896 - 350 Seiten
...consider then," said the President, "the power to annul a law of the United States, assumed by one State, incompatible with the existence of the Union, contradicted...destructive of the great object for which it was formed. ' ' The President declared it to be his intent to "take care that the laws be faithfully executed,... | |
| United States. Congress - 1838 - 684 Seiten
...States, when assumed by a single State, is " incompatible with the existence of the Union, contrawhich it was founded, and destructive of the great object...United States are, for the purposes enumerated in their constituon, one people and a single nation, having delegated 11 power to their common agents to preserve... | |
| United States. Congress. House - 1832 - 988 Seiten
...impracticability and absurdity, thai the « power to annul a law of the United States, assumed by one State,' is incompatible with the existence of the...destructive of the great object for which it was formed," and at the same, time calling, upon the citizens ofthat State, by forcible appeals to their patriotism,... | |
| United States. Congress. House - 1832 - 618 Seiten
...said proclamation, the assumed power of a State to annul a law of Congress is conclusively shown to be incompatible with the existence of the Union, contradicted...was founded, and destructive of the great object for whichit was formed:" Andwhereas, the particular application of this assumed power to the alleged grievances... | |
| William Cobbett - 1832 - 844 Seiten
...destroy it. I consider, then, the power to annul a law of the United States, assumed by one state, incompatible with the existence of the Union, contradicted expressly by the letter of the constitution, unauthorised byits spirit — inconsistent with every principle on which it was founded, and destructive... | |
| American education society - 1833 - 406 Seiten
...country. The president considers the power to annul a law of the United States, assumed by one State, "incompatible with the existence of the Union, contradicted...destructive of the great object for which it was formed." The constitution of the United States, says the president, forms a government, not a league. It is... | |
| New York (State). Legislature. Senate - 1833 - 502 Seiten
...to destroy it. I consider then the power to annul n law of the United States, assumed by one State, INCOMPATIBLE WITH THE EXISTENCE OF THE UNION, CONTRADICTED...DESTRUCTIVE OF THE GREAT OBJECT FOR WHICH IT WAS FORMED. After this general view of the leading principle, we must examine the particular application of it... | |
| 1833 - 682 Seiten
...country. The president considers the power to annul a law of the United States, assumed by one State, "incompatible with the existence of the Union, contradicted...destructive of the great object for which it was formed." The constitution of the United States, says the president, forms a government, not a league. It is... | |
| Bela Bates Edwards - 1833 - 892 Seiten
...and declaring the doctrine that a State has the power to annul a law of the United States, " to be incompatible with the existence of the Union, contradicted...destructive of the great object for which it was formed." In the month of January, 1833, the president communicated a special mesgage to Congress, requesting... | |
| New York (State). Legislature. Assembly - 1833 - 636 Seiten
...power to annul a law of the United States, assumed by one State, INCOMPATIBLE WITH THE EXISTENCE or THK UNION, CONTRADICTED EXPRESSLY BY THE LETTER OF THE...DESTRUCTIVE OF THE GREAT OBJECT FOR WHICH IT WAS FORMED. After this general view of the leading principle, we must examine the particular application of it... | |
| |