 | Leonard MacNally - 1802 - 316 páginas
...jurifdiction is evidence of any matter which came collaterally in queCtion, though within their jurifdiction ; nor of any matter incidentally cognizable; nor of any matter to be inferred by argument by the judgment. Upon the fubject of marriage, the fpiritual court has the fole and exclufive cognizance... | |
 | Thomas Peake - 1804 - 534 páginas
...jurifdietion is evidence of any matter which came collaterally in queftion, though within their jurifdiclion; nor of any matter incidentally cognizable; nor of...matter to be inferred by argument from the judgment. Judgments which are merely on queftions of property between party and party are, as A^e, 38. M7aselfe... | |
 | Robert Joseph Pothier - 1806 - 728 páginas
...jurifdidtion is evidence of any matter which came collaterally in queftion, though within their jurifdiction, nor of any matter incidentally cognizable, nor of any matter to be inferred by argument by the judgment. It was alfo the opinion of the judges, that, fuppofing the fcntence to be conclufive... | |
 | Thomas Bayly Howell - 1814 - 730 páginas
...court, for a different purpose. -But neither the judgment of a concurrent or exclusive jurisdiction is evidence, of any matter which came collaterally in...nor of any matter to be inferred by argument from tbe judgment Upon the subject of marriage, the Spiritual Court has the sole and exclusive cognizance... | |
 | Samuel March Phillipps - 1815 - 600 páginas
...different purpose : but that the judgment either of a court of concurrent or exclusive jurisdiction is not evidence of any matter, which came collaterally in...matter to be inferred by argument from the judgment. (2) But, although such sentences are conclusive, and cannot be impeached from within, yet, like all... | |
 | 1816 - 724 páginas
...court, for a different purpose. But neither the judgment of a concurrent or exclusive jurisdiction is evidence, of any matter which came collaterally in...matter to be inferred by argument from the judgment. Upon the subject of marriage, the Spiritual Court has the sole and exclusive cognizance of questioning... | |
 | Samuel March Phillipps - 1816 - 746 páginas
...different purpose ; but that the judgment either of a court of concurrent or exclusive jurisdiction is not evidence of any matter, which came collaterally in question, though within their )iiri«dicfion, nor of any matter incidentally cognizable, nor of any matter to be inferred by argument... | |
 | United States. Circuit Court (1st Circuit), John Gallison - 1817 - 624 páginas
...neither the judgment of a concurrent or exclusive jurisdiction is evidence of any Harvey vs. Richards. matter, which came collaterally in question, though...matter to be inferred by argument from the judgment." Now in the probate decree before the Court, there is no decision of the court directly upon any point... | |
 | Francis Buller - 1817 - 684 páginas
...court for a different purpose, yet neither the judgment of a concurrent or exclusive jurisdiction is evidence of any matter which came collaterally in question, though within their jurisdiction, nur of any matter incidentally cognizable, nor of any matter to be inferred by agreement from the judgment.... | |
 | William Cruise - 1818 - 648 páginas
...court for a different purpose. But neither the judgment of A concurrent or exclusive jurisdiction is evidence of any matter which came collaterally in...matter to be inferred by argument from the judgment." These rules are laid down with so much precision and accuracy, that there is not a word contained in... | |
| |
... the judgment of a Court of exclusive jurisdiction directly upon the point, is in like manner conclusive upon the same matter, between the same parties, coming incidentally in question in another Court, for a different purpose. But neither the judgment... 
