...mere form of words without rational signification, unless one person's happiness, supposed equal in degree (with the proper allowance made for kind),...nobody for more than one," might be written under the principle of utility as an explanatory commentary.* The equal chum of everybody to happiness in...

...mere form of words without rational signification, unless one person's happiness, supposed equal in degree (with the proper allowance made for kind),...nobody for more than one,' might be written under the principle of utility as an explanatory commentary.* The equal claim of everybody to * This implication,...

...mere form of words, without rational signification, unless one person's happiness, supposed equal in degree (with the proper allowance made for kind),...nobody for more than one," might be written under the principle of utility as an explanatory commentary.* • Thi« implication, in the first principle...

...mere form of words without rational signification, unless one person's happiness, supposed equal in degree (with the proper allowance made for kind),...nobody for more than one,' might be written under the principle of utility as an explanatory commentary.* The equal claim of everybody to happiness in...

...mere form of words without rational signification, unless one person's happiness, supposed equal in degree (with the proper allowance made for kind),...for exactly as much as another's. Those conditions heing supplied, Bentham's dictum, ' everybody to count for one, nobody for more than one,' might be...

...mere form of words without rational signification, unless one person's happiness, supposed equal in degree (with the proper allowance made for kind), is counted for exactly as much as another's. These conditions being supplied, Bentham's dictum, ' everybody to count for oue, nobody for more than...

...of .words without rational signification, unless one person's happiness, supposed equal in cfegree (with the proper allowance made for kind), is counted...nobody for more than one,' might be written under the principle of utility as an explanatory commentary.* The equal claim of everybody to happiness in...

...mere form of words without rational signification, unkss one person's happiness, supposed equal in degree (with the proper allowance made for kind),...nobody for more than one," might be written under the principle of utility aa an explanatory commentary. Now though Bentham ridicules the taking of justice...

...a mere form of words without rational signification unless one person's happiness supposed equal in degree (with the proper allowance made for kind) is...nobody for more than one,' might be written under the principle of utility as an explanatory commentary. The equal claim of everybody to happiness in...

...mere form of words without rational signification, unless one person's happiness, supposed equal in degree (with the proper allowance made for kind),...much as another's. Those conditions being supplied, Hentham's dictum, " Everybody to count for one, nobody for more than one," might be written under the...