« AnteriorContinuar »
Neither of these pieces seem to have been the fudden effufion of fancy. In one the prediction of the marriage with the princess of France, which must have been written after the event; in the other, the promises of the king's kindness to the descendants of Buckingham, which could not be known till it had appeared by its effects ; shew that time was taken for revision and improvement. It is not indeed known that they were published till they appeared long afterwards with other poems.
Waller was not one of those idolaters of praise who cultivate their minds at the expence of their fortunes. Rich as he was by inheritance, he took care early to grow richer by marrying Mrs. Banks, a great heiress in the city, whom the interest of the court was employed to obtain for Mr. Crofts. Having brought him a son, who died young, and a daughter, who was afterwards married to Mr. Dormer of Oxfordfhire, she died in childbed, and left him a widower of about five and twenty, gay and wealthy, to please himself with another marriage.
Being too young to resist beauty, and probably too vain to think himself refiftible, he fixed his heart, perhaps half fondly and half ambitiously, upon the lady Dorothea Sidney, eldest daughter of the earl of Leicester, whom he courted by all the poetry in which Sachariffa is celebrated; the name is derived from the Latin appellation of sugar, and implies, if it nieans any thing, a spiritless mildness, and dull good-nature, such as excites rather tenderness than esteem, and such as, though always
treated with kindness, is never honoured or admired.
Yet he describes Sachariffa as a sublime predominating beauty, of lofty charms, and imperious influence, on whom he looks with amazement rather than fondness, whose chains he wishes, though in vain, to break, and whose presence is wine that inflames to madness.
His acquaintance with this high-born dame gave wit no opportunity of boalting its influence; she was not to be subdued by the powers of verse, but rejected his addresses, it is faid, with disdain, and drove him away to folace his disappointment with Amoret or Phillis. She married in 1636 the earl of Sunderland, who died at Newberry in the king's cause; and, in her old age, meeting fomewhere with Waller, asked him, when he would again write such verses upon her ; “ When you are as young, Madam, said he, " and as handsome, as you were then.”
In this part of his life it was that he was known to Clarendon, among the rest of the men who were eminent in that age for genius and literature; but known so little to his advantage, that they who read his character will not much condemn Sacharissa, that she did not descend from her rank to his embraces, nor think every excellence comprised in wit.
The lady was, indeed, inexorable ; but his uncommon qualifications, though they had no power upon her, recommended him to the molt illustrious scholars and statesmen ; and undoubtedly many beauties of that time, however they might receive his love, were proud of his praises. Who they were, whom he dignifies with poetical names, cannot now be known. Amoret, according to Mr. Fenton, was the lady Sophia Murray. Perhaps by traditions preserved in families more may be difcovered.
From the verses written at Penshurst, it has been collected that he diverted his disappointment by a voyage ; and his biographers, from his poem on the Whales, think it not improbable that he visited the Bermudas; but it seems much more likely that he should amuse himself with forming an imaginary scene, than that so important an incident, as a visit to America, should have been left floating in conjectural probability.
From his twenty-eighth to his thirty-fifth year, he wrote his pieces on the Reduction of Sallee; on the Reparation of St. Paul's; to the King on his Navy; the panegyrick on the queen Mother; the two poems to the earl of Northumberland; and perhaps others, of which the time cannot be discover
When he had lost all hopes of Sachariffa, he looked round him for an easier conquest, and gained a lady of the family of Bresle, or Breaux. The time of his marriage is not exactly known. It has not been discovered that this wife was won by his poetry; nor is any thing told of her, but that she brought him many children. He doubtless praised many whom he would have been afraid to marry; and perhaps married one whom he would have been ashamed to praise. Many qualities contribute to domestick happiness, upon which poetry has no colours to bestow; and many
airs and fallies may delight imagination, which he who flatters them never can approve. There are charms made only for diltant admiration. No spectacle is nobler than a blaze.
of his wife, his biographers have recorded that she gave him five sons and eight daughters.
During the long interval of parliament, he is represented as living among those with whom it was most honourable to converse, and enjoying an exuberant fortune, with that independence and liberty of speech and conduct, which wealth ought always to produce. He was however considered as the kinłman of Hampden, and was therefore supposed by the courtiers not to favour them.
When the parliament was called, in 1640, it appeared that Waller's political character had not been mistaken. The king's demand of a supply, produced one of those noisy speeches which disaffection and discontent regularly dictate; a speech filled with hyperbolical complaints of imaginary grievances. “ They, says he, who think themselves al“ ready undone can never apprehend them“ selves in danger, and they who have no“ thing left can never give freely.” Political truth is equally in danger from the praises of courtiers, and the exclamations of patriots.
He then proceeds to rail at the clergy, being sure at that time of a favourable audience. His topick is such as will always serve its purpose ; an accusation of acting and preaching only for preferment: and he exhorts the Commons carefully to provide for their protection against Pulptt law.
It always gratifies curiosity to trace a fentiment. Waller has in this fpeech quoted Hooker in one passage ; and in another has copied him, without quoting. “Religion,” fays Waller, “ought to be the first thing in " our purpose and desires ; but that which is “ first in dignity is not always to precede in “ order of time; for well-being supposes a “ being; and the first impediment which men “ naturally endeavour to remove, is the want “ of those things without which they cannot “ fubfift. God first assigned unto Adam “ maintenance of life, and gave him a title “ to the rest of the creatures before he ap
pointed a law to observe.”
* God first assigned Adam,” says Hooker, “ maintenance of life, and then appointed “ him a law to observe. True it is, that the “ kingdom of God must be the first thing in “ our purpose and desires; but inasmuch as a “ righteous life presupposeth life, inasmuch as “ to live virtuously it is impossible, except we “ live; therefore the first impediment which “ naturally we endeavour to remove is penury, « and want of things without which we can« not live." B. I. les
The speech is vehement; but the great position, that grievances ought to be redreifed before supplies are granted, is agreeable enough to law and reason: nor was Waller, if his biographer may be credited, such an enemy to the king as not to with his distresses lightened ; for he relates, “ that the king fent particular“ ly to Waller, to second his demand of “ fome subsidies to pay off the army; and Sir " Henry Vane objecting against first voting a