Respecting Persons in Theory and Practice: Essays on Moral and Political Philosophy
Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 5 de fev. de 2002 - 320 páginas
Respecting Persons in Theory and Practice is a collection of essays of the moral and political philosophy of Jan Narveson. The essays in this collection share a consistent theme running through much of Narveson's moral and political philosophy, namely that politics and morals stem from the interests of individual people, and have no antecedent authority over us. Rather, the source of such authority lies in the way people are related to one another, and most especially, in the exigencies of cooperation.
Humans have plenty of problems, Narveson argues, but we are perhaps unique among animals in that our worst enemies, often enough, are other humans. The rules of morals and the devices of politics, in the view Narveson holds, deal with these problems by identifying the potential for gain from cooperation, and loss from the reverse. The essays express a collective antipathy for the ways in which modern political and moral philosophy has ridden roughshod over sane and efficient social restrictions, leaving us with a social scene devoted mainly to satisfying the cravings for power of the politically ambitious. Politics, Narveson argues with distress, has subverted morals. The essays in this collection, in various ways and as applied to various aspects of the scene, detail these charges, arguing that the ultimate and true point of politics and morals is to enable us to make our lives better, according to our varied senses of what that might mean.
O que estão dizendo - Escrever uma resenha
Não encontramos nenhuma resenha nos lugares comuns.
Outras edições - Visualizar todos
Respecting Persons in Theory and Practice: Essays on Moral and Political ...
Visualização parcial - 2002
accept actions Anarchy answer argue argument basic basis beneﬁt better Canadian Philosophical Association capitalist certainly chapter claim common concerned conﬂict course David Gauthier deﬁned deﬁnition democracy deserve difﬁcult discrimination discussion distribution drugs economic effect efﬁciency emotivism entitled equal example fact ﬁgure ﬁnd ﬁrm ﬁrst place fundamental G. A. Cohen human idea individuals inﬂuence interests intrinsically Jan Narveson justiﬁed kind labor labor power liberal Libertarian liberty Lockean Proviso majority Marx Marx’s Marxists matter moral moral realism natural obviously one’s parents Pareto Pareto Principle particular people’s perhaps person philosophers political premises principle problem production proﬁts proposed purposes question rational Rawls reason reﬂection relevant rule sense signiﬁcant simply situation social society someone sort speciﬁc sufﬁcient suppose theorists Theory of Justice things University Press utilitarianism utility war on drugs what’s wrong