..655, 657 ... 492 K. Page Keyser v. Sutherland, 59 Mich. 455. 55 Kimball, etc., Manfg. Co. v. Vro man, 35 Mich. 310............. ..... King v. Hubbell, 42 Mich. 597. Kingsbury v. Kingsbury, 20 Mich. 216.... Kittridge v. Circuit Judge, 80 Mich. 200... Klanowski v. Railway Co., 64 Mich. 279.. 492 560 72 158 433 Final v. Backus, 18 Mich. 218.. Fulton Iron and Engine Works v. Kimball Tp., 52 Mich. 146, 149..... 19 G. 358 98 M. Gamble v. Horr, 40 Mich. 562.. Maclean v. Scripps, 52 Mich. 250.... 646 55 Hoyt v. Jeffers, 30 Mich. 181, 192.......... 622 | McKibben v. Barton, 1 Mich. 213... 658 98 McLaughlin v. Wilks, 42 Mich. 553. 492 O'Marrow v. Port Huron, 47 Mich. 585.. 327 Root v. Potter, 59 Mich. 504. 177 655, 661 658 Ortman v. Greenman, 4 Mich. 291.. 579 Rothschild v. Grix, 31 Mich. 150... 89 People v. Welch, 71 Mich. 548.. 196 267 Sullings v. Shakespeare, 46 Mich. 408. T. Talcott v. Crippen, 52 Mich. 633.... 655 394 Theisen v. Johns, 72 Mich. 285. Pray v. Cadwell, 50 Mich. 222.. 429 Pulford v. Morton, 62 Mich. 25..... 513 Thomas v. Caulkett, 57 Mich. 392... 196 Putnam v. Reynolds, 44 Mich. 114.. 657 | Thomas v. People, 39 Mich. 312.. .658, 659 Stow v. Common Council, 79 Mich. 595... 381 394 Tilden v. Streeter, 45 Mich. 540..... 173 Weiden v. Woodruff, 38 Mich. 131 Township of Port Huron v. Potts, 78 Mich. 435.... Trask v. Green, 9 Mich. 358. Trowbridge v. Bullard, 81 Mich. 456. 658 Tucker v. Mowrey, 12 Mich. 378..... 351 Tupper v. Kilduff, 28 Mich. 394. 233 Turner v. Chapman, 6 Mich. 396. Tyler v. Peatt, 30 Mich. 63........ W. 608, 609 ..551, 630 513 Weise v. Rich, 77 Mich. 325. 8 429 89 71 658 Waite v. Mathews, 50 Mich. 392.... 665 Way's Case, 41 Mich. 299.. Wilson v. Railroad Co., 57 Mich. 155.. Winfield v. Dodge, 45 Mich. 355.... 351 Wood, etc., Machine Co. v. Gaertner, 55 Mich. 455..... 608 177 177 APRIL TERM, 1891.* JOHN J. SHAW v. A. CASS CANFIELD, J. HUFF JONES, AND HENRY B. LEDYARD, TRUSTEES. Power of trustees—Principal and agent.1 1. Where several persons are appointed to execute a power or trust, and no authority is given to a less number than the whole to act, all must join in the execution. Scott v. Society, 1 Doug. 149; Weise v. Rich, 77 Mich. 325. 2. Permission by two of three trustees to their co-trustee to extend the term of a lease and collect the rents cannot be construed as giving him authority to purchase a house on the leased premises. Error to Wayne. (Hosmer, J.) Argued April 17, 1891. Decided May 8, 1891. Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion. Charles Flowers, for appellant. Walker & Walker, for defendants. [The points of counsel are fully stated in the opinion. -REPORTER.] LONG, J. The plaintiff is the owner of a house situate upon lot 26, block 4, Cass Farm, Detroit. The fee *Continued from Vol. 85. For full digest of points decided, see Table of Cases Reported. of the lot is in the defendants as trustees. The plaintiff held a lease of the lot. The lease was originally executed in 1860 by Lewis Cass to Charles Gubby for 10 years. It was renewed from time to time, till May 1, 1880. Gubby held over without renewal, until March 2, 1882, at which time he transferred the lease to the plaintiff. On July 29, 1880, the property then being a part of the estate of Isabella Von Limburg, she executed a trust-deed to the defendants. After the transfer of the lease to the plaintiff, the following extension and agreement was indorsed on the lease: "The within lease is hereby extended for the term of five years from and after the first of January, 1882, at the rate of two hundred dollars per year, payable half yearly; J. Shaw to pay all taxes and comply with the conditions of said lease; also to pay, on or before 1st July, 1882, balance of rent due by Gubby to 1st January, 1882, with interest. J. HUFF JONES, Trustee, etc." The plaintiff on March 10, 1885, sublet said premises to Maggie Burns, by written lease, for $50 per month, and gave Mrs. Burns the option of buying the house on the lot for $700. This lease, by its terms, was to expire on May 1, 1887. The plaintiff's term was to expire under his lease on January 1, 1887. The plaintiff being back on his rent, on November 5, 1885, Mr. Jones sent him the following statement of account: “Mr. J. J. Shaw, "TO VON LIMBURG ESTATE. "J. Huff Jones, agent. "January 1, 1886. To bal. of rent and interest, as per statement given |