...press do not permit a State to forbid advocacy of the use of force or of law violation except where such advocacy is directed to inciting or producing...lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action. Whitney v. California, 274 US 357, overruled. Reversed. Allen Brown argued the cause for appellant....

...press do not permit a State to forbid advocacy of the use of force or of law violation except where such advocacy is directed to inciting or producing...lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action. Whitney v. California, 274 US 357, overruled. Reversed. Allen Brown argued the cause for appellant....

...the last twenty years — that the First Amendment protects advocacy of law violation except "where such advocacy is directed to inciting or producing...lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action." The carefully drawn words of the Convention requiring "direct and public incitement" are thus...

...do not permit a State to forbid or proscribe advocacy of the use of force or of law violation except when such advocacy is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to produce such action. (Emphasis added.) 8 In conformity with these holdings, proscription of advocacy...

...do not permit a State to forbid or proscribe advocacy of the use of force or of law violation except when such advocacy is directed to inciting or producing...lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action." The incitement section of S. 1 is a prescription for governmental tyranny. Under its loose...

...that advocacy of violence or the joining with others to do so could not be proscribed "except where such advocacy is directed to inciting or producing...lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action." Id., at 447. Clearly the New York questions are not nearly so narrowly drawn. New York seeks...

...stating: 78 The State, without running afoul of the First Amendment, has the right to punish one whose advocacy is directed to inciting or producing imminent...lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action. NJSA 2A:148-10 is directed at such persons. It appears that "incitement" statutes are limited...

...Smith Act fails to comply with the Brandenburg mandate that advocacy can be made criminal only where it is directed "to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action." 395 US at 447 What Initially saved the Smith Act from early extinction was the hysteria of...

...permit a State to forbid or proscribe advocacy of the use of force or of law violation except where such advocacy is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is Ukely to incite or produce such action. (Emphasis added) ' And in a related area, the case of New York...

...limiting these freedoms. Even the advocacy of law violation or the use of force may only be proscribt'.l when such advocacy is directed to inciting or producing...non-speech elements may be combined in the same course of conduct."-1 This requirement of an extraordinary government interest seems to be primarily a rhetorical...