The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and PlanningFrank Fischer, John Forester Duke University Press, 12 de jul. de 2013 - 352 páginas Public policy is made of language. Whether in written or oral form, argument is central to all parts of the policy process. As simple as this insight appears, its implications for policy analysis and planning are profound. Drawing from recent work on language and argumentation and referring to such theorists as Wittgenstein, Habermas, Toulmin, and Foucault, these essays explore the interplay of language, action, and power in both the practice and the theory of policy-making. The contributors, scholars of international renown who range across the theoretical spectrum, emphasize the political nature of the policy planner's work and stress the role of persuasive arguments in practical decision making. Recognizing the rhetorical, communicative character of policy and planning deliberations, they show that policy arguments are necessarily selective, both shaping and being shaped by relations of power. These essays reveal the practices of policy analysts and planners in powerful new ways--as matters of practical argumentation in complex, highly political environments. They also make an important contribution to contemporary debates over postempiricism in the social and policy sciences. Contributors. John S. Dryzek, William N. Dunn, Frank Fischer, John Forester, Maarten Hajer, Patsy Healey, Robert Hoppe, Bruce Jennings, Thomas J. Kaplan, Duncan MacRae, Jr., Martin Rein, Donald Schon, J. A. Throgmorton |
Conteúdo
| 1 | |
Policy Institutions and Practices | 19 |
Frames Tropes and Narratives | 115 |
Ill Theoretical Perspectives | 211 |
Contributors | 319 |
| 323 | |
Outras edições - Ver todos
The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning Frank Fischer,John Forester Visualização parcial - 1993 |
The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning Frank Fischer,John Forester Visualização parcial - 1993 |
Termos e frases comuns
acid rain action adversarial agenda alternatives analysis and planning appreciative system approach argued argumentative turn assess Cambridge Campbell causal CEGB challenge Chicago cogency cogeneration communicative rationality conception conflict consensus conservative context criteria critical critical rationalism critical rationalist debate decision democratic discourse coalition discussion ecological modernization ecomodernist economic elite environmental epistemological ethical evaluation example experience frames guidelines Habermas hermeneutic institutional interpretation issues John Forester knowledge claims liberal McKeon Medicaid ment metaphor narrative neoconservative normative Oregon participants particular persuasion planners policy analysis policy arguments policy belief systems policy discourse policy-making political judgment pollution positivism postpositivist practice stories problem professional proposal selection public policy question rational reason reform relevance rhetorical role Sam Mitchell scientific scientists social science Society strategy structure survey task force technical technocratic Theory think tanks threats tion tive Toulmin traditional pragmatist tropes understanding University Press validity values York