Abbildungen der Seite
PDF
EPUB

Entered according to the Act of Congress, in the year 1891,

By JOHN L. GRIFFITHS,
In the Office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington, D. C.

Ree. Seb. 14, 1891

PRINTED AND BOUND BY CARLON & HOLLENBECK,

INDIANAPOLIS.

ELECTROTYPED BY INDIANAPOLIS ELECTROTYPE

FOUNDRY.

TABLE OF THE CASES

REPORTED IN THIS VOLUME.

lock v

Abbott, Roberts,by Next Friend,v. 83 | Cicero School Tp. v. Chicago Abbott v. Union Mutual Life In- Nat'l Bank.

79 surance Co....

70 Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Aldrich, Dixon v..

.296 Louis and Chicago R. W. Co. Apple v. Board of Commissioners v. Smith...

.461 of Marion Co....

553 Citizens Bank of Noblesville v. Applegate, McLead v .349 Harrison

.128 Ashmead v. Reynolds. .441 Citizens Street R. R. Co., Indian

apolis Cable Street R. R. Co. v.369 Baker v. Bourne.

.466 City of Fort Wayne, Shuman v. .109 Baltimore and Ohio and Chicago City of Franklin v. Harter.. .446

R. R. Co. v. Walborn. 142 City of NewAlbany v.McCulloch.500 Barnes v. Zoercher.... .105 City of New Albany, State, ex Board of Commissioners of Ma- rel. Schook, v.

.221 rion County, Apple v. .553 Colvin v. State.

403 Board of Commissioners of Mar- Consumers Gas Trust Co., Whitshall County v. Johnson. .238

62 Bourne, Baker v... .466 Cook, Miller v.

..339 Bowers v. State, ex rel. Taylor. .272 Cook v. Quick.

..477 Boyd v. Murphy.. .174 Coovert, Wiley v.

..559 Braden v. Lemmon. 9 Coppage v. Gregg.

..359 Brosnan v. Sweetser. 1 Corder, Fankboner v.

.164 Brown, Taylor v. .293 Cowgar. Harding v.

.245 Bruce, by Next Friend, v. Tyler. 468 Cox v. Haun..

.325 Brumbaugh v. Richcreek.. .240 Craig v. Frazier..

..286 Bryan v. Watson.

42 Buck v. Hughes...

46 Daubenspeck v. Pool. ..364 Buckner v. Spaulding .229 Davis v. Hutton.

..481 Byram v. Stout.. .195 | Davis v. Meisner.

.313 Davis, Woodward v.

.172 Canada and St. Louis R. W. Co., Deller v. Hofferberth.

.414 Farmers Loan and Trust Co. v. 250 Dismore, Harrod v..

338 Carnahan v. Schwab.. .507 Dixon v. Aldrich.

.296 Carpenter, Voorhees v. 300 Dodge, Habig v.

31 State, ex rel. Coetlosquet. 204 Dodge, Jerauld v.

..600 Catterson, Pouder v. .434 Durham y. Hiatt.

..514 Chambers v.State,ex rel. Barnard.365 Duvall v. Kenton.

..178 Chandler v. Scott.

.226 Chase, Eversole v.

297 | Earnhart v. Earnhart.. ..397 Chicago Nat'l Bank,Cicero School East, Kempshall v.

.320 79 Eisert, Chicago, St. Louis and Chicago, St. Louis and Pittsburgh Pittsburgh R. R. Co. v. ....156 R R. Co. v. Eisert.

156 Engle, State, ex rel. Hamilton, v.457

Carr v.

Tp. v.

Estate of Hornung, Goodbub v.181 | Kenton, Duvall v.

178

Etchison, McLaughlin v... 474 Kern, State v..

465

Eversole v. Chase.

297 Keys, Shipman v.

353

Kilgore v. Kilgore.

.276

Fairplay School Tp. v. O'Neal.. 95

Fankboner v. Corder.. .164 Larkin, Walker v.

100

Farley v. State..

.419 Leak, Goodwine v.

.569

Farmers Loan and Trust Co. v.

Lemmon, Braden v

9

Canada and St. Louis R. W. Levy, Toledo,St. Louis and Kansas

Co.....,

250 City R. R. Co. v.

168

Ferguson v. Spencer.

66 Leyden, Rogers v

50

Ferrell, Ray v.

.570 Litten v. Wright School Tp. 81

Fiscus v. Fiscus!

..283 Loesnitz v. Seelinger... .422

Fort Wayne, City of, Shuman v.109 Louisville, New Albany and Chi-

Franklin, City of, v. Harter..... .446 cago R. W. Co. v. Rush.. .545

Frazier, Craig v.

.286 Lunkenheimer, Germania Life

Ins. Co. of New York v......536

Germania Life Ins. Co. of New

York v. Lunkenheimer.. .536 Marion, Town of, v. Skillman. .130

Gillett v. Sullivan.

.327 May, Greenwaldt v.

.511

Goodbub v. Estate of Hornung.181 McCarty v. State.

.223

Goodell v. Starr..

.198 McCormack, Potter v.

439

Goodwine v. Leak.

.569 McCormick v. Smith,

.230

Greenwaldt v. May.

.511 McCulloch,City of New Albany v.500

Gregg, Coppage v.

.359 McLaughlin v. Etchison.. .474

McLead y. Applegate.

.349

Habig v. Dodge...

31 Meisner, Davis v.

343

Hanch v. Ripley.

.151 | Merritt v. Richey

.400

Harding v. Cowgar..

.245 Miller v. Cook..

339

Harris, Scott v

.520 Morgan, Newhouse v.

Harrison, Citizens Bank of No. Murphy, Boyd v.

.174

blesville v..

.128

Harrod v. Dismore.

.338 Nesbit, Powers v.

.497

Harry v. Harry

91 New v. New..

.577

Harter, City of Franklin v .446 NewAlbany,City of,v.McCulloch.500

Haun, Cox v.

325 New Albany, City of, State, ex

Hiatt, Durham v.

514 rel. Schook, v.

.221

Hinkle v. State.

490 Newhouse v. Morgan.

436

Hofferberth, Deller v.

414 | Nichols v. State.

406

Hornung, Estate of, Goodbub, v. 181

Hovey, Governor, v. State, ex rel. O'Neal, Fairplay School Tp. v.. 95

Schuck.

..588

Howerton, Indianapolis and St. Paxton v. Sterne.

.289

Louis R. W. Co. v.

.236 Perrette, Jewett v.

97

Hughes, Buck v.

46 | Place, State v.

194

Hutton, Davis v.

481 Pool, Daubenspeck v.

364

Potter v. McCormack.

439

Indianapolis Cable Street R. R. Pouder v. Catterson.

434

Co. v. Citizens Street R. R. Co.369 Powers v. Nesbit.

497

Indianapolis and St. Louis R. W.

Co. v. Howerton

.236 Quick, Cook v....

.477

Jackson v. Jackson.

.346 Ramey v. State, ex rel. Stryker. .243

Jacobs v. State.

77 Ray v. Ferrell...

..570

Jerauld v. Dodge.

.600 Reynolds, Ashmead v.

441

Jewett v. Perrette.

97 Richcreek, Brumbaugh v. 240

Johnson Board of Commissioners Richey, Merritt v.

400

of Marshall Co. v.

238 Ripley, Hanch v.

151

Roberts, by Next Friend, v. Ab-

Kempshall v. East.

.320 bott.

83

.. 436

Rogers v. Leyden..

50 State, ex rel. Stryker, Ramey v.243 Rush, Louisville, New Albany State, ex rel. Taylor, Bowers v..272 and Chicago R. W. Co. v.....545 State,ex rel. Wiseman,v.Wheeler.451

Sterne, Paxton v..

..289 Sage v. State. 15 Stevens v. Stevens.

..560 Satterwhite v. Sherley.

59 Stites' Estate, Schrichte v. ..472 Schlotter v. State, ex rel. Croy..493 Stout, Byram v.

.195 Schrichte v. Stites' Estate. .472 Sullivan, Gillett v.

327 Schwab, Carnahan v.. .507 Sweeney, Watts v.

.116 Scott, Chandler v.. .226 Sweetser, Brosnan v

1 Scott v. Harris....

.520 Seelinger, Loesnitz v. .422 Taylor v. Brown..

.293 Sherley, Satterwhite v. -59 Toledo, St. Louis and Kansas Shipley, Weaver v..

.526

City R. R. Co. v. Levy. 168 Shipman v. Keys..

..353 | Town of Marion v. Skillman.. 130 Shuman v. City of Fort Wayne. 109 Trotter, Windell v.

..332 Skillman, Town of Marion v. ,:.130 Tyler, Bruce, by Next Friend, v. 468 Smith, Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis and Chicago R. W.

Union Mutual Life Insurance Co., Co. y.

461
Abbott v......

70 Smith, McCormick v.

230 Spaulding, Buckner v.

229 Spencer, Ferguson v.

66 Voorhees v. Carpenter. ........300 Starr, Goodell v..

.198 State v. Place..

194 Walborn, Baltimore and Ohio State v. Kern.

465 and Chicago R. R. Co. v. ...142 State, Colvin v. 403 Walker v. Larkin.

.100 State, Farley v 419 Watson, Bryan v.

42 State, Hinkle v. 490 Watts v. Sweeney.

.116 State, Jacobs v. 77 | Weaver v. Shipley.

...526 State, McCarty v.

.223 Wheeler,State,ex rel. Wiseman,v.451 State, Nichols v.

.406 Whitlock y. Consumers Gas Trust State, Sage v. 15 Co...

62 State, Williams v. .471 Wiley v. Coovert.

.559 State,ex rel.Barnard,Chambers v.365 Williams v. State.

471 State, ex rel. Coetlosquet, Carr v. 204 Windell v. Trotter.

.332 State, ex rel. Croy, Schlotter v..493 Wolever, State, ex rel. Egan, v..306 State, ex rel. Egan, v. Wolever. .306 Wolf v. Zimmerman..

.486 State, ex rel. Hamilton, v. Engle. 457 Woodward v. Davis.

.172 State, ex rel. Schook, v. City of Wright School Tp., Litten v.... 81 New Albany

.221 State, ex rel. Schuck, Hovey,Gov- Zimmerman, Wolf v.

.486 ernor, v... ..588 ' Zoercher, Barnes v.

.105

TABLE OF THE CASES

CITED IN THIS VOLUME

297..

Abshire v. Mather, 27 Ind. 381.. 27 | Avery v. Akins, 74 Ind. 283..... 35
Adams v. Bicknell, 126 Ind. 210.470
Adams v. Slate, 87 Ind. 573..75, 242 Baddeley v. Patterson, 78 Ind.
Adamson v. Rose, 30 Ind. 380...441

157..

520 Aiken v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co., Baker v. Kirk, 33 Ind. 517. 596 130 Pa. St. 380.

.148 Baldwin v. Kerlin, 46 Ind. 426..532 Ainsworth v. Atkinson, 14 Ind. Ballin v. Ferst, 55 Ga. 546. 23 538.

.513 Baltimore, etc., R. R. Co. v. WalAlbrecht v. C. C. Foster, etc., Co., born, 127 Ind. 142. .57, 418 126 Ind. 318..

438 Bardeus v. Huber, 45 Ind. 235. 108 Alexander v. North Western Barkeloo v. Randall, 4 Blackf. Christian University, 57 Ind. 476....

.320 466....

.327 Barker v. Buell, 35 Ind. 297. 257 Alexander v. State, 9 Ind. 337.. 23 Barling v. West, 29 Wis. 307 .115 Alleman v. Hawley, 117 Ind. 532.485, Barnes v. Zoercher, 126 Ind. 434. 107

588 Barry v. New York Central, etc., Allen v. Craft, 109 Ind. 476. 399 R. R. Co., 92 N. Y. 289. .553 Allen v. Duffie, 43 Mich. 1. 45 Barry v. Schmidt, 27 Alb. L. J. Amick v. Butler, 111 Ind. 578. .102

.327 Anderson v.Claman, 123 Ind. 471.427 Bartholomew v. Merchants’ Ins. Anderson v. Hubble, 93 Ind. 570.265 Co., 96 Am. Dec. 65.

.544 Anderson v. Pennie, 32 Cal. 265.459 | Bartholomew v. Pierson, 112 Ind. Andrews v. Spurlin, 35 Ind. 262.349 430..

270 Andrews v. Washburn, 3 $. & M. Bartlett v. Beardmore, 77 Wis. 109. .192 356...

137 Annely v. De Saussure, 26 S. C. Barton v. Bryant, 2 Ind. 189. 304 497.

94 Bass v. Doerman, 112 Ind. 390. 264 Appeal of Hartranft, 85 Pa. St. Bates v. Taylor, 87 Tenn. 319., 594 433.

.595 Batten v. Smith, 62 Wis. 92. .305 Ard v. State, 114 Ind. 542.. .225 Bauman v. Grubbs, 26 Ind. 419. 201 Armstrong v. Grogan, 5 Sneed, Bayless v. Glenn, 72 Ind. 5. 351 108...

.470 | Beatty v. Gilmore, 16 Pa. St. 463.402 Armstrong v. Lawson, 73 Ind. Bell v. Longworth, 6 Ind. 273..201, 498.. .532

292 Armstrong v. Short, 95 Ind. 326.573 Bellows v. McGinnis, 17 Ind. 64.291 Arnold v. Curl, 18 Ind. 339. .331 Bennett v. Agricultural Ins. Co., Ashley v. Eberts, 22 Ind. 55. .291 106 N. Y. 243...

.544 Aszman v. State, 123 Ind. 347...421 Bennett v. Butterworth 11 How. Atkins v. Van Buren School Tp., 669..

73 77 Ind. 447.

97 Bennett v. Ford, 47 Ind. 264. 103 Attorney General v. Cape Fear, Berg v. Baldwin, 31 Minn. 541.. 408

etc., Co., 2 Iredell Eq. 444. ...220 Berlin v. Oglesbee, 65 Ind. 308. .464 Auditorial Board v. Arles, 15 Bessette v. State, 101 Ind. 85 .497 Texas, 72...

.220) Bethell v. Bethell, 92 Ind. 318..150

« ZurückWeiter »