Imagens da página
PDF
ePub

business; he appears as a witness. How? Did he know any one circumstance of the rebellion? No; he does not even pretend to do so. But, says he, in my travels I was obliged to avoid Fyzabad, upon account of the suspected rebellion there. Another chief justice would have gone fifty miles about to avoid Lucknow, for every body knows that Lucknow was the focus and centre of extortion, corruption, and peculation; and that a worse air for the lungs of a chief justice could not be found in the world. If his lungs wanted the benefit of pure air, he would even have put himself in the focus of a rebellion, to have kept at a distance from the smell of carrion and putrid corruption of every kind that was at Lucknow.

A chief justice may go to a place where a rebellion is raging, he may die a martyr to his honor. But a chief justice, who puts himself into the focus of peculation, into the focus of bribery, into the focus of every thing that is base and corrupt; what can we expect from him but that he will be engaged in clandestine jobs there! The former might kill Sir Elijah Impey, the knight errant, but the chief justice would remain pure and entire; whereas Sir Elijah Impey has escaped from Lucknow, and the chief justice is left by Mr. Hastings to shift for himself.

After mentioning this violation of the laws of hospitality by Sir Elijah Impey, I would ask, was any notice given by him, or by any of Mr. Hastings's agents, to the nabob, who was so immediately interested in this matter? Was any notice given to the begums, that any such charge was entertained against them? Not a word. Was it notified to the eunuchs? Was it to Saadit Ali Khân? Not a word; they were all within their power. The eunuchs were a year in irons, and they were subjected to the want of food and water, for a part of that year. They were dragged from Fyzabad to Lucknow, and from Lucknow to Fyzabad. During all that time, was there a word mentioned to them by any one person on the part of Mr. Hastings, that they were accused of this matter? Not a word.

We now submit to your lordships' vindictive justice and condemnation this recriminatory defence, in which every principle of justice has been violated; and now I will ask your lordships, whether you would have suffered such a procedure in the case of the prisoner at your bar? It was asked by a person of great authority in this house, when we were going to produce certain evidence against Mr. Hastings, (we do not say whether we offered to produce it properly or improperly, that is another matter,) we were asked, I say, whether our intentions of producing that evidence had been communicated to Mr. Hastings? Had he had an opportunity of cross-examining the witnesses who had given that evidence? No; he added, that evidence must be rejected. Now I say to your lordships, upon the same ground, deal with the begums as you dealt with Mr. Hastings. Do not keep two weights and measures for different persons in the same cause. You would not suffer such evidence to be produced against him; you will not assuredly suffer such evidence to be produced to you in his favor and against them.

My lords, the cause between this man and these unfortunate women is at last come into Westminster Hall. The cause is come to a solemn trial; and we demand other witnesses and other kinds of proof than what these affidavits furnish. My lords, the persons who have been examined here are almost all of them the same persons who made these affidavits; but there is this material difference in their evidence. At your lordships' bar they sunk all those parts of their former evidence which criminated the nabob and Saadit Ali, and confined their testimony wholly to what related to the begums. We were obliged, by a cross-examination, to squeeze out of them the disavowal of what they had deposed on the former occasion. The whole of their evidence we leave to the judgment of your lordships, with these summary remarks,-first, that they are the persons who were to profit by their own wrong: they are the persons who had seven months' arrears paid to them out of the money of these un

fortunate ladies: they are the persons who, to justify the revolt which they had caused in the country by their robbery, charge their own guilt upon others. The credibility of their evidence is therefore gone; but, if it were not affected by these circumstances, Mr. Hastings has put an end to it by telling you, that there is not one of them who is to be credited upon his oath; no, not in a court martial; and can it therefore be expected, that in a case of peculation, they will do otherwise than acquit the party accused? He has himself laid before you the horrible state of the whole service; your lordships have it fresh in your memories, and ringing in your ears. You have also heard from witnesses brought by Mr. Hastings himself, that these soldiers committed misdemeanors of the very same kind with those which we have stated. They ought not therefore to be listened to for a moment; and we aver that it is an aggravation of the prisoner's crimes, that he has brought the instruments of his guilt, the persons of whom he has complained as having ruined and destroyed that country, and whom he had engaged at the nabob's desire, in the treaty of Chunar, to send out of the country, as being a nuisance in it; to bring, I say, these people here, to criminate, at a distance of nine thousand miles, these unfortunate women, where they have neither attorney nor agent who can from local knowledge cross-examine them. He has the audacity to bring these people here; and in what manner they comport themselves when they come here, your lordships have seen.

There is one of them whom we cannot pass by; that is Captain Gordon. The other witnesses, who appeared here as evidences to criminate the begums, did it by rumors and hearsays. They had heard some person say that the begums had encouraged rebellion, always coupling them with Saadit Ali Khân, and sometimes with the nabob, because there might have been some probability for their charge in the transactions with Saadit Ali Khân, which, though impossible with regard to the begums, they thought would implicate

[blocks in formation]

him in his designs. But Captain Gordon is to give a different account of the proceedings.

Captain Gordon was one of Colonel Hannay's under-farmers he was hunted out of the country, and, as one of the begums says, pursued by a thousand of the zemindars, for robbing the whole country. This woman, through respect to the British name, that name which guarantied her possessions to her, receives this Captain Gordon and Captain Williams with every mark of kindness, hospitality, and protection, that could be given them. She conveys them from the borders to the city of Fyzabad, and from Fyzabad, her capital, supposed to be the nest of her rebellion, on to their place of destination. They both write her letters full of expressions of gratitude and kindness for the services that they had received. They then pass on to Lucknow to Sir Elijah Impey, and there they sink every word of kindness— of any service or protection that they had received;—or of any acknowledgment that they had ever made of it. They sink all this; not one word of it appears in their affidavits. How then did we come to the knowledge of it? We got it from Major Gilpin, who was examined in the course of these proceedings, and we used it in our charge, from the papers that we hold in our hands. Mr. Hastings has confessed the fact, and Mr. Middleton has endeavored to slur it over, but could not completely conceal it. We have established the fact, and it is in evidence before your lordships.

You have now, then, in this manner, got these testimonials given by English officers in favor of these women; and by the same means the letters of the latter accusing the former are come to your hands; and now these same English officers come here with their recriminatory accusation. Now, why did they not make it at Lucknow? Why did not Mr. Hastings, when Mr. Middleton had such papers for him in his hands, why, I ask, did not Mr. Hastings procure some explanation of the circumstances whilst he was in India? I will read your lordships the letter, that you may not only know, but feel the iniquity of this business.

Letter from the Mother of the Vizier to Mr. Hastings, received the 6th of January, 1782.

"Our situation is pretty well, and your good health is constantly prayed for. I had sent Behar Ali Khân to you. Accordingly people invented a falsehood, that Behar Ali Khân was gone to get the deputy ship of the Soubah; and some persons here were saying, wherefore has she sent Behar Ali Khân to Calcutta to the Nawab Amaud ul Dowlah? We will never permit the affair to succeed and accordingly it has so happened. For they say, that you also have not put your seal to the treaty and the people here say, why does the noble lady correspond with the English gentlemen? On this account, I did not send a letter at the time when you came this way. Now the state of affairs here is thus ;-On the 27th Zehedja, Azoph ul Dowlah Behadur, without my knowledge, sent his own aumils into my jaghire. I accordingly wrote several times to Mr. Middleton on this business; that his seal was to the treaty and writing of discharge. Why did he not negotiate in my favor? Mr. Middleton replied, the Nawab is the master. I wrote frequently, but without effect. Being helpless, I represent to you the state of my affairs, that notwithstanding the existence of this treaty, I have been treated in this manner. It is useless for me to stay here. Whatever is, is a compact; whenever any one deviates from his compact, he meets with no credit for the future; and the light of mine eyes, Asoph ul Dowlah, wrote to me, that he had sent his own aumils into my jaghires, and would pay ready money from his treasury. Reflect on my security for his adhering to his future engagements, from the consideration of his conduct under his past promises. I do not agree to his ready money. Let me have my jaghire as formerly; otherwise, leaving this place, I will wait on you at Benares, and thence will go towards Shah Jehan Abad, because he has not adhered to his engagement. Send letters to Azoph ul Dowlah, and to Mr. Middleton, and

« AnteriorContinuar »