 ... within the time specified in section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure after notice of the entry of judgment. As to that motion the conclusion we have reached on the merits of the appeal renders unnecessary a consideration of that question. The...  Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Judicature of ... - Página 338de Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, Michael Crawford Kerr, James Buckley Black, Augustus Newton Martin, John Worth Kern, Francis Marion Dice, John Lewis Griffiths, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy - 1888Visualização completa - Sobre este livro
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1916 - 804 páginas
...which we can consider are those claiming that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence, and that the trial court erred in denying the motion for a new trial upon that ground. After a careful examination of the evidence, we cannot say that the verdict... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1917 - 824 páginas
...deside. They decided it in favor of the plaintiff, and an examination of the record does not satisfy us that the trial court erred in denying the motion for a new trial on the ground that the verdict was not against the great weight of the evidence. See Druck v.... | |
 | 1919 - 948 páginas
...unnecessary a consideration of that question. The first point presented for a reversal of the judgment is that the trial court erred in denying the motion for a new trial made on the ground of the misconduct of the jury, the defendants claiming that the jury determined... | |
 | Canal Zone. Supreme Court - 1909 - 524 páginas
...consideration of this appeal we shall discuss three only of the appellant's assignments of error, viz: (1) That the trial court erred in denying the motion for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. (2) That the judgment of conviction was contrary... | |
 | 1913 - 1272 páginas
...whereupon the blocking gave way, and the link fell on plaintiff's foot, as above stated. In view of our conclusion that the trial court erred in denying the motion for a directed verdict, we need notice but the one assignment of error predicated upon such ruling. [4] As... | |
 | Idaho. Supreme Court - 1914 - 906 páginas
...because the evidence is not sufficient to justify the judgment of conriction of the appellant. 9. Held, that the trial court erred in denying the motion for a new trial, and that the motion for a new trial should be granted. Feb. 1914.] STATE v. JONES. 589 Argument... | |
 | 1916 - 1204 páginas
...decide. They decided It In favor of the plaintiff, and an examination of the record does not satisfy us that the trial court erred In denying the motion for a new trial on the ground that the verdict was not against the great weight of the evidence. See Druck v.... | |
 | California. District Courts of Appeal - 1919 - 948 páginas
...unnecessary a consideration of that question. The first point presented for a reversal of the judgment is that the trial court erred in denying the motion for a new trial made on the ground of the misconduct of the jury, the defendants claiming that the jury determined... | |
 | 1920 - 1022 páginas
...upon the verdict The defendants have appealed. They make but one assignment of error, to the effect that the trial court erred in denying the motion for a new trial. They argue that the respondent was not hired, and that he was bound by the receipt which he... | |
| |
