Direct Democracy and the Courts
Cambridge University Press, 31 de ago de 2009 - 278 páginas
Who should have the last word on fundamental policy issues? This book analyzes the rise of two contenders - the people, through direct democracy, and the courts. Introduced in the U.S. during the Progressive Era and now available in nearly half the states, direct democracy has surged in recent decades. Through ballot measures, voters have slashed taxes, mandated government spending, imposed term limits on elected officials, enacted campaign finance reform, barred affirmative action, banned same-sex marriage, and adopted many other controversial laws. In several states, citizens now bypass legislatures to make the most important policy decisions. However, the "people's rule" is not absolute. This book demonstrates that courts have used an expanding power of judicial review to invalidate citizen-enacted laws at remarkably high rates. The resulting conflict between the people and the courts threatens to produce a popular backlash against judges and raises profound questions about the proper scope of popular sovereignty and judicial power in a constitutional system.
O que estão dizendo - Escrever uma resenha
Não encontramos nenhuma resenha nos lugares comuns.
List of Tables and Figures
The Epic Debate
Direct Democracy Gathers Force
The CounterMajoritarian Power
The Courts at Work
Conflicts Over Rights
Outras edições - Visualizar todos
activists afﬁrmative Alaska American approved argued Arizona Arkansas ballot California Constitution California Secretary California Supreme Court California voters campaign ﬁnance citizen lawmaking Colorado conﬂict Congress Const constitutional rights Constitutionalism courts invalidated criminal death penalty declared deﬁne deﬁnition democracy’s Democratic direct democracy due process elected ofﬁcials electorate enacted enforcement equal protection federal constitutional federal courts Federalist ﬁrst ﬁve Ibid initiative and referendum initiative constitutional amendment initiative power initiative process initiatives adopted institutions judges judicial power judicial review Justice legislature litigation majority measure minority North Dakota ofﬁce opponents Oregon Paciﬁc People’s percent political popular populist Progressive Era prohibition proposed Proposition 22 provisions recall reformers regulation repeal representatives Republican restrictions same-sex marriage single-subject rule speciﬁc state’s strongest initiative Taft term limits initiative Theodore Roosevelt U.S. Supreme Court U.S. Term Limits University Press violated vote voter-approved initiatives voters adopted Washington York