...which the legislature could grant or withhold at pleasure; and, quoting from a California case(43): " It is not the subject of private ownership, except...see fit, absolutely prohibit the taking of it, or any traffic and commerce in it, if deemed necessary for its protection or preservation, or the public...

...domain of the police power of the State. In Ex parte Maier, 103 Cal. 476, 37 Pac. Rep. 402, it is said : 'The wild game within a State belongs to the people...fit, absolutely prohibit the taking of it, or traffic or commerce in it, if it is deemed necessary for the protection or preservation of the public good.'...

...it contravenes the constitution of this state as being In excess of the police power of the state. The wild game within a state belongs to the people...see fit, absolutely prohibit the taking of it, or any trallic or commerce in it, if deemed necessary for its protection or preservation, or the public...

...principle Is clearly set forth in the following language : "The wild game and fish within a state belong to the people in their collective sovereign capacity....they see fit absolutely prohibit the taking of it or any traffic or commerce In it If deemed necessary for Its protection or the preservation of the public...

...State of birds captured in other States. The supreme court of the State of California has declared that "the wild game within a State belongs to the people...sovereign capacity. It is not the subject of private o» mrship except in so far as the people may elect to make it so, and they mav if they see fit, absolutely...

...legislate in relation to game in other states, the statute Is therefore void ; and It is contended that the wild game within a state belongs to the people in their collective sovereign capacity. Game is not the subject of private ownership, except In so far as the people may elect to make it so,...

...Supreme Court of the United States, in a decision handed down in 1895, entitled Geer vs. Connecticut, elect to make it so, and they may if they see fit, absolutely prohibit the killing cf it, or traffic or commerce in it. That its taking possession and the disposition thereof...

...quoted by the Supreme Court of the United States in Geer v. Connecticut. 161 US 519, 529, as follows: "The wild game within a state belongs to the people...see fit, absolutely prohibit the taking of it, or any traffic or commerce in it, if deemed necessary for its protection or preservation, or the public...

...it contravenes the constitution of this state as being in excess of the police power of the state. The wild game within a state belongs to the people...people may elect to make it so; and they may, if they Bee fit, absolutely prohibit the taking of it, or any traffic or commerce in it, if deemed necessary...

...Minn. 393. See also Magner v. People, 97 111. 320. In Ex p. Maier, 103 Cal. 476, it is held that " the wild game within a state belongs to the people...see fit, absolutely prohibit the taking of it, or any traffic or commerce in it, if deemed necessary for its protection or preservation, or the public...