 ... whether the restraint is such only as to afford a fair protection to the interests of the party in favor of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interests of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection...  The Southeastern Reporter - Página 2111896Visualização completa - Sobre este livro
 | New Jersey. Court of Chancery - 1887 - 812 páginas
...party in favor of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interest of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection...oppressive, it is, in the eye of the law, unreasonable and void, on the ground of public policy, as being injurious to the interests of the public. The rule,... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas, Peregrine Bingham - 1831 - 850 páginas
...party in favour of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interests of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection...oppressive, it is, in the eye of the law, unreasonable. Whatever is injurious to the interests of the public is void, on the grounds of public policy. In the... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas, John Bayly Moore, Joseph Payne - 1832 - 874 páginas
...party in favour of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interests of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection of the party can be of no benefit to either; it 1831. can only be oppressive; and, if oppressive, it is in the eye of the law unreasonable. Whatever... | |
 | Samuel Bealey Harrison, Great Britain. Court of King's Bench, Frederick Luard Wollaston - 1837 - 520 páginas
...party in favour of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interests of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection...oppressive, it is, in the eye of the law, unreasonable. Whatever is injurious to the interest of the public is void, on the grounds of public policy." It may... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of King's Bench - 1837 - 886 páginas
...party in favour of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interests of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection...oppressive, it is in the eye of the law unreasonable. Whatever is injurious to the interests of the public, is void on the grounds of public policy." It... | |
 | Francis Stack Murphy, Edwin Tyrrell Hurlstone, Great Britain. Court of Exchequer - 1838 - 416 páginas
...party in favour of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interests of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection...oppressive, it is, in the eye of the law, unreasonable. Whatever is injurious to the interests of the public is void on the grounds of public policy.1' In... | |
 | 1839 - 474 páginas
...should be coextensive only with the benefits meant to be enjoyed on the other."i And by Tindal, CJ : " Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection...oppressive, and if oppressive, it is in the eye of the law unreasonable."2 This principle is equally applicable to every other species of restraint, and is the... | |
 | John William Smith - 1841 - 744 páginas
...party in favour of whom it is given, and not so large as to interfere with the interests of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection...oppressive, it is in the eye of the law unreasonable. Whatever is injurious to the interest of the public is void, on the grounds of public policy. No certain... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Chancery, Charles Beavan - 1842 - 726 páginas
...interests of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection of the party [requires] can be of no benefit to either; it can only be oppressive,...oppressive, it is in the eye of the law unreasonable. Whatever is injurious to the interests of the public is void on the grounds of public policy." Now,... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Chancery, Charles Beavan - 1842 - 730 páginas
...interests of the public. Whatever restraint is larger than the necessary protection of the party [requires] can be of no benefit to either ; it can only be oppressive,...oppressive, it is in the eye of the law unreasonable. Whatever is injurious to the interests of the public is void on the grounds of public policy." Now,... | |
| |
