Equitable Choices for Health

able according advice advocacy allow alternative areas barriers benefit better cancer capacity cent centres chapter choice in primary choose collective commissioners commissioning community organisations consultation contestability contribute costs create currently decision-making decisions developed disadvantaged groups discussed disease effect efficiency empowering encourage engagement ensure equity example excluded experiences funding greater health inequalities health services health system healthcare hospital implemented important improve incentives increase individual information and support involvement language lead less Link living London long-term conditions meet needs needs and preferences networks offer opportunities options organisations outcomes particular pathway patient choice PCTs pilots practices present primary care professionals progressive providers receive recommended reduce referral regulation require responsiveness risk role secondary sector self-care social specialist standards tion transport treatment Trusts users vision voice waiting Whilst